On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:20 PM, T o n g wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:14:08 +0100, ludovico van wrote:
>
so, is there a tool like ddrescue, which ignores errors (and maybe
retries to read the bad blocks), but working at the filesystem level,
so i can copy only selected files?
>
>
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:14:08 +0100, ludovico van wrote:
>>> so, is there a tool like ddrescue, which ignores errors (and maybe
>>> retries to read the bad blocks), but working at the filesystem level,
>>> so i can copy only selected files?
>>
>> I think the problem is next step -- if such program
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:35 PM, T o n g wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:25:07 +0100, ludovico van wrote:
>
>> so, is there a tool like ddrescue, which ignores errors (and maybe
>> retries to read the bad blocks), but working at the filesystem level, so
>> i can copy only selected files?
>
> I thi
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:25:07 +0100, ludovico van wrote:
> so, is there a tool like ddrescue, which ignores errors (and maybe
> retries to read the bad blocks), but working at the filesystem level, so
> i can copy only selected files?
I think the problem is next step -- if such program does exist,
hi all,
i have a damaged HD with many bad blocks on it, and i'm trying to
recover its files.
the first try was using ddrescue, but (even with the --no-split
option) it took an entire day to only copy a couple of GiB...
since i can successfully mount the disk and browse its files, it would
be nic
5 matches
Mail list logo
