Thank you for the suggestion, Felix, although I'm not quite ready to
levy my scorn and blame on KDE (yet). Since my last post, it turns out
that the full KDE desktop DOES start, but it takes an excruciating
amount of time (more on that in a second). systemd, systemd-analyze
and journald report noth
Borden Rhodes composed on 2016-12-13 17:20 (UTC-0500):
The Intel package driver was already purged from my system. I tried
reinstalling it to no use. Purged xwayland, too (which I don't use but
nevertheless installed). No help. I've also checked dmesg, messages,
Xorg.0.log & syslog and syslog an
The Intel package driver was already purged from my system. I tried
reinstalling it to no use. Purged xwayland, too (which I don't use but
nevertheless installed). No help. I've also checked dmesg, messages,
Xorg.0.log & syslog and syslog and found nothing out of the ordinary
in those logs. It just
Borden Rhodes composed on 2016-12-13 12:14 (UTC-0500):
Thank you for the references, Felix.
Unfortunately, nothing you sent is applicable because SDDM doesn't
even start in the first place. Computer goes unresponsive when it
Which Intel chipset/CPU model do you have? Skylake? Lotsa troubles
Borden Rhodes composed on 2016-12-13 12:52 (UTC-0500):
Thank you, Hans. My laptop has an Intel chipset, so nvidia doesn't
apply. I think the recommended driver for my chipset is the
framebuffer or vesa device, but I may try reinstalling the Intel
driver to see if that fixes it.
Maybe the appro
Thank you, Hans. My laptop has an Intel chipset, so nvidia doesn't
apply. I think the recommended driver for my chipset is the
framebuffer or vesa device, but I may try reinstalling the Intel
driver to see if that fixes it.
On 13 December 2016 at 12:37, Hans wrote:
> Note, that SDDM does not work
Note, that SDDM does not work with the proprietrary nvidia drivers.
This maybe will not be fixed, as this behavior is documented since almost a
year.
Hans
Thank you for the references, Felix.
Unfortunately, nothing you sent is applicable because SDDM doesn't
even start in the first place. Computer goes unresponsive when it
tries to start X and then I have to force shut down. I've been able to
start - just - by booting into multi-user.target and mask
hould never break :-)
Regards,
Yvan
Le mardi 13 décembre 2016 à 05:16 -0500, Felix Miata a écrit :
> Borden Rhodes composed on 2016-12-13 04:46 (UTC-0500):
>
> > on Sunday I upgraded the xserver and wayland packages to
> > their current testing version. Now my computer fr
Borden Rhodes composed on 2016-12-13 04:46 (UTC-0500):
on Sunday I upgraded the xserver and wayland packages to
their current testing version. Now my computer freezes or hangs when
it tries to start KDE/SDDM. Can't switch into consoles and the only
option is to hard power off. Seems to
imply have more systemic issues which will take a lot
more effort to fix.
For example, on Sunday I upgraded the xserver and wayland packages to
their current testing version. Now my computer freezes or hangs when
it tries to start KDE/SDDM. Can't switch into consoles and the only
option is to
Hello after a long absence. Following up (in a sense) on the recent
thread about the wisdom of mixing elements from the stable and
testing/unstable distributions, I wanted to ask about how stable
current testing is.
I used to run the testing distribution as a matter of course, but have
been too
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:50 AM, S Scharf wrote:
> I recently upgraded my desktop hardware and installed the current testing
> distribution, but by
> myth backend server is still running old-stable. The last debian-multimedia
> release of myth for
> old-stable was 0.23.1 which
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:50:41AM -0400, S Scharf wrote:
> > I recently upgraded my desktop hardware and installed the current testing
> > distribution, but by
> > myth backend server is still running old-stable. The las
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:50:41AM -0400, S Scharf wrote:
> I recently upgraded my desktop hardware and installed the current testing
> distribution, but by
> myth backend server is still running old-stable. The last debian-multimedia
> release of myth for
> old-stable was
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:50:41AM -0400, S Scharf wrote:
> I recently upgraded my desktop hardware and installed the current testing
> distribution, but by
> myth backend server is still running old-stable. The last debian-multimedia
> release of myth for
> old-stable was
I recently upgraded my desktop hardware and installed the current testing
distribution, but by
myth backend server is still running old-stable. The last debian-multimedia
release of myth for
old-stable was 0.23.1 which is incompatible with running the available 0.24
front end on testing.
I have
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 11:07, noc ops wrote:
>
>>http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>>
>>is the above link correct or should i be looking elsewhere?
>
>
> This is something you could have answered with Google.
> http://cdimage.debian.org/
--
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 11:07, noc ops wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>
> is the above link correct or should i be looking elsewhere?
This is something you could have answered with Google.
http://cdimage.debian.org/
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk):
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
is the above link correct or should i be looking elsewhere?
regards,
/virendra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo