Re: crashme

2002-05-02 Thread Ulf Rompe
s over the one bad bit. > I think if crashme couldn't bring down the machine, let alone the > JVM. Well, I don't know, I'll try to run crashme a lot longer. Maybe your "why" remains unanswered even if crashme crashes your system... [x] ulf -- Artificial Intellige

Re: crashme

2002-05-01 Thread Oki DZ
On 05/01 12:14 Crispin Wellington wrote: > Did your machine crash? If it did, then there is something wrong. It No, it didn't. Then I tried to run it for one hour. It was all right, but crashme dumped this: Subprocess 3417: Dump of 100661296 bytes of data 26 116 109 237 128 146 66 82

Re: crashme

2002-05-01 Thread Crispin Wellington
On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 09:10, Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to run crashme to test my machine, but it exited: > ... > Subprocess 70: Got signal 11 segmentation violation > Subprocess 70: Barfed > Subprocess 70: try 40, Badboy at 134605992. 0x805ECA8 > Subprocess

crashme

2002-04-30 Thread Oki DZ
Hi, I tried to run crashme to test my machine, but it exited: ... Subprocess 70: Got signal 11 segmentation violation Subprocess 70: Barfed Subprocess 70: try 40, Badboy at 134605992. 0x805ECA8 Subprocess 70: Got signal 4 illegal instruction Subprocess 70: Barfed Subprocess 70: try 41, Badboy at