On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 at 16:58 GMT, Gerard Ceraso penned:
> I have a hard drive that is going bad so I want to copy it from the
> old hard drive to the new one, same hd and everything. I was wondering
> which was faster doing dd if=/dev/hdc of=/dev/hda or mounting each
> partition and and just using
Pigeon wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:58:41PM -0400, Gerard Ceraso wrote:
I have a hard drive that is going bad so I want to copy it from the old
hard drive to the new one, same hd and everything. I was wondering which
was faster doing dd if=/dev/hdc of=/dev/hda or mounting each partition
and a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:58:41PM -0400, Gerard Ceraso wrote:
> I have a hard drive that is going bad so I want to copy it from the old
> hard drive to the new one, same hd and everything. I was wondering which
> was faster doing dd if=/dev/hdc of=/dev/hda or mounting each partition
> and and just
I have a hard drive that is going bad so I want to copy it from the old
hard drive to the new one, same hd and everything. I was wondering which
was faster doing dd if=/dev/hdc of=/dev/hda or mounting each partition
and and just using cp.
~gerard
http://devslash.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
4 matches
Mail list logo