Hi:
This is Janny from Hello Lighting.
We focus on TFT/OLED and Capacitive TP products such as 2.0", 3.5" , 4.3", 7",
10.1" , and also capacitive touch panel.
Here i am writing to see if there is any business opportunity .
Best Regards
Janny
Harrison Bello
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not be apprehensive by this mail as I humbly seek YOUR PATIENCE,
UNDERSTANDING and COOPERATION in regard to my below plight. Once again, do
not
be apprehensive considering its magnitude and the fact that we have not
meet before.
I am contacting
dear sir:
we are a trading company having our factory in china
we are specializing in the bags and watches you
can depend on geting the competitive price and good
quality product from us.
but if you want to find some other items in china,
you can see if we can help you to find the bet
we are looking for software to facilitate remote realtime cooperation
on things like documents. the stuff that micro$oft netmeeting always
wanted to do. i have until monday to propose a couple of solutions
before the prof will run off and get in touch with microsoft. first,
i don't want to
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:50:21PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 11:41:52PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
>
> > > I had this problem too and upgraded to mutt 1.0i and it's gone away, so
> > > I guess it was a known bug that got fixed.
> > Is the mutt 1.0i availabl
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 11:41:52PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
> 1.0 appears to be in unstable according to a search on
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>
> > Is it able to handle automatically multipart/splitted messages (eg.
> > generated by mpack)?
Mutt has very sophsticated han
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 11:41:52PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
> > I had this problem too and upgraded to mutt 1.0i and it's gone away, so
> > I guess it was a known bug that got fixed.
> Is the mutt 1.0i available somewhere as a debian package?
1.0 appears to be in unstable according to a
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 08:48:36PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> I had this problem too and upgraded to mutt 1.0i and it's gone away, so
> I guess it was a known bug that got fixed.
Is the mutt 1.0i available somewhere as a debian package?
Is it able to handle automatically multipart/splitt
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 06:57:17PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
> I can't force my mutt/gpg set to work properly. Signing of messages
> works fine (as can be seen from this message :-) ), but I can't
> encrypt a message to be sent to somebody. I have the recipient's
> public key in my public
Hi all,
I can't force my mutt/gpg set to work properly. Signing of messages works fine
(as can be seen from this message :-) ), but I can't encrypt a message to be
sent
to somebody. I have the recipient's public key in my public keyring. I can
encrypt the date with this recipient's public key usi
10 matches
Mail list logo
