On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:42:57AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:23:17PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > This is a great reason to be using LVM with separate LVs. Need to
> > convert? Create a new LV, make the new filesystem, tar the data over to
> > it. Whe
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 08:18:53AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:04:40PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:42:57AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:23:17PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thi
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:04:40PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:42:57AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:23:17PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > > This is a great reason to be using LVM with separate LVs. Need to
> > > conv
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:42:57AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:23:17PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > This is a great reason to be using LVM with separate LVs. Need to
> > convert? Create a new LV, make the new filesystem, tar the data over to
> > it. Whe
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:23:17PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> This is a great reason to be using LVM with separate LVs. Need to
> convert? Create a new LV, make the new filesystem, tar the data over to
> it. When everything is working, delete the old LV. If you need extra
> space dur
On Aug 3, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Is there a way to convert from ext2 to anything?
Well, you can convert from ext2 to ext3 just by adding a journal with
tune2fs and remounting. The actual on-disk format is identical; the
journal is just a special 'file.'
--
To UNSUB
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:15:42PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
from the RM bug report:
- The final step in converting a filesystem, reordering the blocks of
the target filesystem, is apparently programmed in a very inefficient
way, and it can take weeks
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:15:42PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> from the RM bug report:
>
> - The final step in converting a filesystem, reordering the blocks of
> the target filesystem, is apparently programmed in a very inefficient
> way, and it can take weeks for large filesystem
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:44:39PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Is there a way to convert from ext2 to anything?
>
I think its the tried-and-true method of tar by way of spare space on
some device.
This is a great reason to be using LVM with separate LVs. Need to
convert? Create a new LV,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:44:39PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Andrew J. Barr wrote:
>> On 8/3/07, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
So I doubt it. How you proceed depends on what mount point we're
Andrew J. Barr wrote:
On 8/3/07, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
So I doubt it. How you proceed depends on what mount point we're
talking about. Hopefully, its not /. Anything else you can 'fix' by
doing a ba
On Aug 3, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Hopefully, its not /. Anything else you can 'fix' by
doing a backup, going single-user, unmount the partition, remake the
filesystem, mount it, and restore the backup, then shutdown back to
multi-user.
You can do the same thing with / if
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:41:52PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > So I doubt it. How you proceed depends on what mount point we're
> > talking about. Hopefully, its not /. Anything else you can 'fix' by
> > doing a bac
On 8/3/07, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > So I doubt it. How you proceed depends on what mount point we're
> > talking about. Hopefully, its not /. Anything else you can 'fix' by
> > doing a backup, going
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> So I doubt it. How you proceed depends on what mount point we're
> talking about. Hopefully, its not /. Anything else you can 'fix' by
> doing a backup, going single-user, unmount the partition, remake the
> filesystem, mount
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:23:06PM +0530, Bhasker C V wrote:
>
> Is there a method to convert an ext3 file system created with -T
> largefile4 to a normal ext3 file system with normal block sizes ?
> (without losing data).
I don't think that -t largefile changes the size of block sizes but
chang
All,
Is there a method to convert an ext3 file system created with -T
largefile4 to a normal ext3 file system with normal block sizes ?
(without losing data).
Thanks
--
Bhasker C V
Registered Linux user: #306349 (counter.li.org)
The box said "Requires Windows 95, NT, or better", so I installed L
17 matches
Mail list logo
