Re: Search results for linux-image and kernel-image via apt and packages.debian.org conflicts

2022-01-29 Thread Pankaj Jangid
David Wright writes: > On Sun 30 Jan 2022 at 09:29:29 (+0530), Pankaj Jangid wrote: >> When I search via apt i.e. ‘apt search linux-image’ gives results: >> >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> Sorting... >> Full Text Search... >> linux-headers-5.10.0-10-amd64/

Re: Search results for linux-image and kernel-image via apt and packages.debian.org conflicts

2022-01-29 Thread David Wright
On Sun 30 Jan 2022 at 09:29:29 (+0530), Pankaj Jangid wrote: > When I search via apt i.e. ‘apt search linux-image’ gives results: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > Sorting... > Full Text Search... > linux-headers-5.10.0-10-amd64/stable 5.10.84-1 amd64 > Head

Search results for linux-image and kernel-image via apt and packages.debian.org conflicts

2022-01-29 Thread Pankaj Jangid
When I search via apt i.e. ‘apt search linux-image’ gives results: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Sorting... Full Text Search... linux-headers-5.10.0-10-amd64/stable 5.10.84-1 amd64 Header files for Linux 5.10.0-10-amd64 linux-headers-5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64/sta

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-20 Thread Joao Roscoe
Excellent. Time to read about udev. Will do my homework, try a few tests, and will get back with results and, possibly, more questions :-D Thank you, everybody for your valuable help (and time). Best regards, João On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 2:54 AM Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Mon, Aug 20, 201

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-19 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:51:24AM -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote: > Hmmm... > > If I create a NIS group (with a high ID), called serial_ports, dhould I > just, as root, chgrp /dev/ttyS0 so that it's group is serial_ports ? You could, and it may even work, but it would be temporary. To mak

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-19 Thread Joao Roscoe
Hmmm... If I create a NIS group (with a high ID), called serial_ports, dhould I just, as root, chgrp /dev/ttyS0 so that it's group is serial_ports ? João On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 12:47 PM Michael Stone wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 02:48:56PM -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote: > >Right, that's best p

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-19 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 02:48:56PM -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote: Right, that's best practice. But, what if I need to include a user who is defined in NIS in lp or ttyS0 group? Would going into /etc/group in *every* machine be unavoidable? That's one option. Another would be to create new centrally

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-17 Thread deloptes
Joao Roscoe wrote: > But, what if I need to include a user who is defined in NIS in lp or ttyS0 > group? Would going into /etc/group in *every* machine be unavoidable? your print server will be the only one to consider for lp group for example or just do something with ansible or puppet or what

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-17 Thread Joao Roscoe
Right, that's best practice. But, what if I need to include a user who is defined in NIS in lp or ttyS0 group? Would going into /etc/group in *every* machine be unavoidable? João On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:42 PM Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:27:32PM -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote:

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-17 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:27:32PM -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote: > However, it will not solve the problem on how to centrally manage system > resources access across distros. You don't manage OS-specific (or "distro"-specific if you prefer that term) group IDs in a network database. Those are managed

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-17 Thread Joao Roscoe
You are right, I forgot to state that yes, I do use NFS to share files - great tip, this GID / UID remapping thing - thanks a lot. However, it will not solve the problem on how to centrally manage system resources access across distros. Joao On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:49 AM wrote: > -BEGIN

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-17 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote: > I have redhat and debian machines in the same network. Users and groups are > controlled via NIS > > I have realized that redhat and debian have different groups definitions > for system r

Re: Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-17 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0300, Joao Roscoe wrote: What would be the best way to manage this (other than managing groups on machines themselves, individually)? Different NIS domains for different distros? Is there any tutorial on managing multiple domains on the same NIS server, out the

Group ID conflicts between different distros: how to manage them with NIS?

2018-08-17 Thread Joao Roscoe
GID 7. That means that I cannot manage his kind of group based resource access control from NIS - not from a single one, at least, without doing something to remedy the conflicts Maybe I could just chgrp the device files as needed, but I'd rather avoid doing this kind of intrusive tinkering

Re: Debian Stretch package conflicts... libnettle4 libarchive13 libgnutls-deb0-28 libgnutls30

2016-05-14 Thread Rick Thomas
On May 14, 2016, at 3:45 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When I try to do aptitude full-upgrade on my Stretch Apple G4 PowerMac, I >> get conflicts. >> >> These do not seem to

Re: Debian Stretch package conflicts... libnettle4 libarchive13 libgnutls-deb0-28 libgnutls30

2016-05-14 Thread Rick Thomas
On May 14, 2016, at 3:52 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2016-05-13 18:43 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > > >> When I try to do aptitude full-upgrade on my Stretch Apple G4 PowerMac, I >> get conflicts. >> >> These do not seem to be transient — they have been there

Re: Debian Stretch package conflicts... libnettle4 libarchive13 libgnutls-deb0-28 libgnutls30

2016-05-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2016-05-13 18:43 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > When I try to do aptitude full-upgrade on my Stretch Apple G4 PowerMac, I get > conflicts. > > These do not seem to be transient — they have been there for several days. > > Anybody know what’s going on? > >> The fol

Re: Debian Stretch package conflicts... libnettle4 libarchive13 libgnutls-deb0-28 libgnutls30

2016-05-14 Thread Dutch Ingraham
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 06:43:11PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > When I try to do aptitude full-upgrade on my Stretch Apple G4 PowerMac, I get > conflicts. > > These do not seem to be transient — they have been there for several days. > > Anybody know what’s going

Debian Stretch package conflicts... libnettle4 libarchive13 libgnutls-deb0-28 libgnutls30

2016-05-14 Thread Rick Thomas
Hi, When I try to do aptitude full-upgrade on my Stretch Apple G4 PowerMac, I get conflicts. These do not seem to be transient — they have been there for several days. Anybody know what’s going on? Thanks! Rick > The following NEW packages will be installed: > libnettle4{a} > The

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-15 Thread Alan Chandler
On 13/01/16 12:31, Maciej Wołoszyn wrote: Hi, On my Stretch system updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd. I removed ifupdown. I got network problems (no loopback) so I wanted to reinstall ifupdown, with no luck. In my case, aptitude suggested removing ifupdown and replacing it by ifupdown2

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-14 Thread Adam Wilson
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:25:45 + Joe wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:59:19 +0300 > Adam Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:31:30 +0100 > > Maciej Wołoszyn wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > On my Stretch system up

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-14 Thread Joe
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:59:19 +0300 Adam Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:31:30 +0100 > Maciej Wołoszyn wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > On my Stretch system updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd. > > > I removed ifupdown. > > > I g

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-14 Thread Maciej Wołoszyn
Thanks for the explanation. Now I see that my question came simply from the misinterpreted aptitude's suggestion to remove ifupdown and install ifupdown2. I made a mistake to assume that ifupdown2 is intended to replace ifupdown, and to think that successful install of ifupdown2 (which is not in

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-13 Thread Adam Wilson
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:31:30 +0100 Maciej Wołoszyn wrote: > Hi, > > > On my Stretch system updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd. > > I removed ifupdown. > > I got network problems (no loopback) so I wanted to reinstall > > ifupdown, with no luck. >

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 13.01.2016 um 16:00 schrieb Hans: > Hi list, >>> >>> I'm curious if other people also experience such problems? >>> If yes, I'd like to file the bug, but at the moment I don't know if the >>> problem is with ifupdown2 or systemd. >> > I tried ifupdown2, but at the moment I get only an ip address

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-01-13 16:00:55 +0100, Hans wrote: > I think, it is very unlucky, to release systremd with these bad dependencies. > I hope, the dependencies will be fixed as soon as possible or a big warning > should appear, as network is really an essential function. The problem is not the dependencies

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-13 Thread Martin Read
On 13/01/16 15:00, Hans wrote: I think, it is very unlucky, to release systremd with these bad dependencies. I hope, the dependencies will be fixed as soon as possible or a big warning should appear, as network is really an essential function. Your warning of these problems is simple: it is the

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-13 Thread Hans
Hi list, > > > > I'm curious if other people also experience such problems? > > If yes, I'd like to file the bug, but at the moment I don't know if the > > problem is with ifupdown2 or systemd. > I tried ifupdown2, but at the moment I get only an ip address with dhcp. The entries in /etc/network

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 13.01.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Maciej Wołoszyn: > Hi, > >> On my Stretch system updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd. >> I removed ifupdown. >> I got network problems (no loopback) so I wanted to reinstall ifupdown, >> with no luck. > > In my case, apti

Re: updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-13 Thread Maciej Wołoszyn
Hi, > On my Stretch system updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd. > I removed ifupdown. > I got network problems (no loopback) so I wanted to reinstall ifupdown, > with no luck. In my case, aptitude suggested removing ifupdown and replacing it by ifupdown2 ('ifupdown rewritt

updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd

2016-01-12 Thread arne
Hello, On my Stretch system updating ifupdown conflicts with systemd. I removed ifupdown. I got network problems (no loopback) so I wanted to reinstall ifupdown, with no luck. I tried to remove systemd and did not fully succeed, now I get no login after a reboot. Booting in safe mode does not

Re: conflicts in stretch

2015-10-26 Thread moxalt
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 02:28:23 +0100, Jens Tobiska wrote: > I am running sid/stretch and noticed that for some time now, around 200 > packages have been "kept back" when doing "apt-get upgrade". Try an apt-get dist-upgrade. Apt-get upgrade only updates packages with new versions available, while d

conflicts in stretch

2015-10-26 Thread Jens Tobiska
I am running sid/stretch and noticed that for some time now, around 200 packages have been "kept back" when doing "apt-get upgrade". Also installing some other packages (e.g. sqlitebrowser) does not work unless I uninstall some 64 other packages. Is this due to some library conflict? Will it be s

Re: wheezy multiarch: binutils:amd64 conflicts with binutils:i386?

2015-04-23 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:54:47AM -0400, Tom Roche wrote: > > summary: 3 questions: > > 1. Can one install both `binutils:amd64` and `binutils:i386` on the same > device? I don't believe so. > 2. If one can: how? or, what am I doing wrong? > 3. If one cannot: why not? Multiarch works for lib

wheezy multiarch: binutils:amd64 conflicts with binutils:i386?

2015-04-22 Thread Tom Roche
After this operation, 325 kB disk space will be freed. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? ^C > $ date ; sudo aptitude -s install binutils:i386 > Thu Apr 23 00:08:21 EDT 2015 > The following NEW packages will be installed: > binutils:i386{b} libstdc++6:i386{a} zlib1g:i386{a} > 0 pack

Re: Jessie/sid 64: ia32-libs "conflicts" with libjack-jackd2

2013-09-09 Thread Lucio Crusca
In data lunedì 9 settembre 2013 11:44:20, Darac Marjal ha scritto: > Usage of ia32-libs is now discouraged, in favour of enabling the i386 > architecture (dpkg --add-architecture i386; apt-get update) and > installing the native 32-bit version of your application. Do you know by any chance of the

Re: Jessie/sid 64: ia32-libs "conflicts" with libjack-jackd2

2013-09-09 Thread Darac Marjal
; apt-get update) and installing the native 32-bit version of your application. If libopus0:i386 conflicts with libopus0:amd64, then I THINK that means that that library isn't multiarch-cabable. For many libraries, it's possible to install several architectures at the same time (into /usr/lib/{tr

Jessie/sid 64: ia32-libs "conflicts" with libjack-jackd2

2013-09-08 Thread Lucio Crusca
Hi *, I need ia32-libs in order to enable 3D features of the fglrx driver in my 64bit box. Until a few days ago I had it installed ok. Then, after some aptitude update, I got broken packages because of ia32-libs: it depends on libjack-jackd2-0:i386, which in turn depends on libopus0:i386, which

Re: "GNOME Help" conflicts with darklooks theme

2012-07-19 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:19:21 -0400, Joshua wrote: (please, try to reply at the bottom, thanks) > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:20 +, Camaleón wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:43:09 -0400, Joshua wrote: >> >> > When using GNOME with the darklooks theme, which is white text on >> > black background

Re: "GNOME Help" conflicts with darklooks theme

2012-07-18 Thread Joshua
Yep, I'm using stable. Thanks for the advice, man. Should I try to see if I can replicate the bug elsewhere? I'm running Debian on virtual box from within xubuntu right now. I prefer Debian, so I could install it natively on the hard drive and see if the same thing happens there. I also have a

Re: "GNOME Help" conflicts with darklooks theme

2012-07-18 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:43:09 -0400, Joshua wrote: > When using GNOME with the darklooks theme, which is white text on black > background, the GNOME help application displays its documents with black > text on black background. Even if I deselect the option 'use system > fonts', the problem persis

Re: "GNOME Help" conflicts with darklooks theme

2012-07-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 02:43 -0400, Joshua wrote: > When using GNOME with the darklooks theme, which is white text on black > background, the GNOME help application displays its documents with black > text on black background. Even if I deselect the option 'use system > fonts', the problem persists

"GNOME Help" conflicts with darklooks theme

2012-07-17 Thread Joshua
When using GNOME with the darklooks theme, which is white text on black background, the GNOME help application displays its documents with black text on black background. Even if I deselect the option 'use system fonts', the problem persists. The main menu to Help does display white text on black

Re: Observing IP Conflicts

2011-10-28 Thread Volkan YAZICI
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:36:51 +0100, Raf Czlonka writes: > Or "ucarp". I guess "keepalived" has been mentioned already and since > you're not running a cluster it might be an overkill. Really good stuff! I didn't know them. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: Observing IP Conflicts

2011-10-28 Thread Volkan YAZICI
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:46:51 -0500, green writes: > I have not used it, but you might want to look at the vrrpd package. Interesting... I didn't know that. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: Observing IP Conflicts

2011-10-28 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:46:51AM BST, green wrote: > Volkan YAZICI wrote at 2011-10-27 12:16 -0500: > > I have two servers A and B, where both knows the IP address of itself > > and the other. Assume A goes down (that is, A is not reachable via > > ping), then B temporarily takes the IP address o

Re: Observing IP Conflicts

2011-10-27 Thread green
Volkan YAZICI wrote at 2011-10-27 12:16 -0500: > I have two servers A and B, where both knows the IP address of itself > and the other. Assume A goes down (that is, A is not reachable via > ping), then B temporarily takes the IP address of A via IP aliasing. I have not used it, but you might want

Re: Observing IP Conflicts

2011-10-27 Thread Carlos Bergero
You seem to be looking for fail safe redundancy, may be you would like to check heartbeat, or running a small cluster with virtual servers in it, with fail over. Sincerely, Carlos El 27/10/11 15:16, Volkan YAZICI escribió: Hi, I have two servers A and B, where both knows

Re: Observing IP Conflicts

2011-10-27 Thread Volkan YAZICI
Nevermind. See "apt-file search ipwatchd". On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:16:43 +0300, Volkan YAZICI writes: > I have two servers A and B, where both knows the IP address of itself > and the other. Assume A goes down (that is, A is not reachable via > ping), then B temporarily takes the IP address of A vi

Observing IP Conflicts

2011-10-27 Thread Volkan YAZICI
Hi, I have two servers A and B, where both knows the IP address of itself and the other. Assume A goes down (that is, A is not reachable via ping), then B temporarily takes the IP address of A via IP aliasing. Now the problem is, when A wakes up, I want B to get alerted by this event. Any ideas?

ACPI I/O resource conflicts with ACPI region SMBI

2011-10-03 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Dear all, I am trying to install a debian stable on my new DELL Vostro 3750. the d-i went perfectly fine. However when booting up debian, boots stops at: Waiting for /dev to be fully populated [10.133655] ACPI I/O resource :00:1f.3 [0xefa0-0xefbf] conflicts with ACPI region SMBI [0xefa0

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-05-16 Thread Jesús M. Navarro
Hi, Alexander: On Monday 19 April 2010 15:16:02 B. Alexander wrote: > I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. > This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken > packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been usin

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-30 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 30 April 2010 11:30:56 Preston Boyington wrote: > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > In my case you probably wouldn't. Mixed Lenny+security+volatile/lenny- > > backports/testing+volatile/Sid/experimental systems with > > debian-multimedia added in don't fall on your support list do they?

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-30 Thread Preston Boyington
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: In my case you probably wouldn't. Mixed Lenny+security+volatile/lenny- backports/testing+volatile/Sid/experimental systems with debian-multimedia added in don't fall on your support list do they? ;) I thought this was normal... :D -- Arrant Drivel - really, i

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-30 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 30 April 2010 09:44:16 Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:54:20PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." was heard to say: > > If (c), aptitude will usually churn until it's solver exhausts all > > available memory and it either dies, or is killed by the OMM-killer in > > the k

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:54:20PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." was heard to say: > If (c), aptitude will usually churn until it's solver exhausts all available > memory and it either dies, or is killed by the OMM-killer in the kernel. You > can 'Ctrl+C' to kill aptitude earlier if you wish

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
ced a growing number of broken > > packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade > > for months now, hoping that it would work itself out over time. However, > > this hasn't happened. So what can I do to fix the problems without losing > >

Re: python-twisted-core not getting updated on i386, but is updated on amd64 [was Re: Increasing number of conflicts]

2010-04-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi. Rick Thomas (21/04/2010): > I don't know how this can happen, but it definitely did happen. > Enjoy! The list of Arch: all packages merged into the Packages list for a given architecture depends (!) on the build status of the related Arch: any packages. I can think of the following referenc

Re: python-twisted-core not getting updated on i386, but is updated on amd64 [was Re: Increasing number of conflicts]

2010-04-21 Thread Rick Thomas
On Apr 21, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: The reason seems to be that python-twisted-core version 10.0.0-3 is available on amd64 Sid, but on i386 Sid it's only available at version 10.0.0-2 . Maybe it needs to be rebuilt fo

Re: python-twisted-core not getting updated on i386, but is updated on amd64 [was Re: Increasing number of conflicts]

2010-04-21 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:58:53AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:41, Rick Thomas wrote: The reason seems to be that python-twisted-core version 10.0.0-3 is available on amd64 Sid, but on i386 Sid it's only available at version 10.0.0-2 . Maybe it need

Re: python-twisted-core not getting updated on i386, but is updated on amd64 [was Re: Increasing number of conflicts]

2010-04-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:58:53AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:41, Rick Thomas wrote: > > The reason seems to be that python-twisted-core version 10.0.0-3 is > > available on amd64 Sid, but on i386 Sid it's only available at version > > 10.0.0-2 . > > > > Maybe it needs

Re: python-twisted-core not getting updated on i386, but is updated on amd64 [was Re: Increasing number of conflicts]

2010-04-21 Thread Tristan Seligmann
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > The reason seems to be that python-twisted-core version 10.0.0-3 is > available on amd64 Sid, but on i386 Sid it's only available at version > 10.0.0-2 . > > Maybe it needs to be rebuilt for i386 ? python-twisted-core is an Arch: all package,

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-21 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman
ber of > broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using > safe-upgrade for months now, hoping that it would work itself out over > time. However, this hasn't happened. No, of course not. Sid is constantly undergoing the sort of changes

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-21 Thread B. Alexander
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:07 PM, John Hasler wrote: > B. Alexander wrote: > > I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a > > while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of > > broken packages, unmet dependencies and co

Re: python-twisted-core not getting updated on i386, but is updated on amd64 [was Re: Increasing number of conflicts]

2010-04-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:41, Rick Thomas wrote: > > On Apr 20, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Jimmy Johnson wrote: > >> If I was you I would start by finding out why python-twisted-core is not >> getting upgraded to the latest version that's in the repos and so on, with a >> little investigating I'm

python-twisted-core not getting updated on i386, but is updated on amd64 [was Re: Increasing number of conflicts]

2010-04-20 Thread Rick Thomas
On Apr 20, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Jimmy Johnson wrote: If I was you I would start by finding out why python-twisted-core is not getting upgraded to the latest version that's in the repos and so on, with a little investigating I'm sure you will find what has broken your system, it may help to us

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-20 Thread John Hasler
B. Alexander wrote: > I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a > while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of > broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using > safe-upgrade for months now, hoping that it

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-20 Thread Monique Y. Mudama
s whcih seem to have gotten confused by >versions: > >luatex: Conflicts: texlive-base-bin (< 2008) but 2007.dfsg.2-8 is >installed. >python-kde4: Depends: python-sip4 (>= ) but >4.10.2-1 is to be installed. This might be a little painful for the KDE pa

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-20 Thread B. Alexander
the most recent of which was the transition from kde3 to kde4. Packages getting left along the way. Another thing is packages whcih seem to have gotten confused by versions: luatex: Conflicts: texlive-base-bin (< 2008) but 2007.dfsg.2-8 is installed. python-kde4: Depends: python-sip4 (>= ) but

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-20 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,19.Apr.10, 20:28:16, Joe wrote: > You don't run sid unless you have a sense of humour. That's a good one :) You might want to attach a full name to it, for proper attribution ;) Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/ma

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-20 Thread Monique Y. Mudama
On Tue, Apr 20 at 7:31, B. Alexander penned: > >In my case, it appears the root of the problems are caused by >bitrot. I probably need to come up with some method of rebuilding >my sid boxes every so often. Prior to this, my rebuilds were done >in 2000 and 2007...Maybe if I am goi

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-20 Thread B. Alexander
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Jimmy Johnson wrote: > B. Alexander wrote: > >> I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. >> This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken >> packages, unmet dependencies and

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Jimmy Johnson
B. Alexander wrote: I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade for months now, hoping that it would work itsel

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Jimmy Johnson
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: When I do 'aptitude full-upgrade' I get 1 broken package: The following packages are BROKEN: python-twisted-conch and 1 package with unmet dependencies: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python-twisted-conch: Depends: python-twisted-core (>= 10.0.0-3)

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Jimmy Johnson
Mark Allums wrote: I noticed OP's post contained g++. My Sid is also trying to uninstall g++. Without me posting about 8k worth of useless diagnostics, would you happen to know the reason why? I'm not seeing the problem, currently my unstable/testing system is fully up-to-date and nothin

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Mark Allums
On 4/19/2010 8:28 AM, Wolodja Wentland wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:16 -0400, B. Alexander wrote: I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflic

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
You sent just to me. I'm sending back to the list and CC'ing you. On Monday 19 April 2010 16:27:08 B. Alexander wrote: > Thank you for this. I knew that aptitude had a an ncurses interface, but to > be honest, it looked too similar to dselect, which dredged up some bad > memories from about 10 ye

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 19 April 2010 08:16:02 B. Alexander wrote: > I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. > This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken > packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade &g

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Joe
does the upgrades that don't cause a ruckus. dist-upgrade is the one that displays the conflicts and wants to remove packages. Thanks for testing a development branch of Debian :) No problem. Most of my Debian installs at home run sid, with the rest running testing...Except my firewall, whic

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
B. Alexander wrote: I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade for months now, hoping that it would work itsel

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread B. Alexander
e noticed a growing number of broken > packages, > > unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade for > months > > now, hoping that it would work itself out over time. However, this hasn't > > happened. So what can I do to fix the problems without l

Re: Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:16 -0400, B. Alexander wrote: > I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. > This > is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken packages, > unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-u

Increasing number of conflicts

2010-04-19 Thread B. Alexander
I've got an issue with a sid box that I have been maintaining for a while. This is my workstation, and I have noticed a growing number of broken packages, unmet dependencies and conflicts. I have been using safe-upgrade for months now, hoping that it would work itself out over time. However,

Re: sid dist-upgrade: lvm2 conflicts with devicekit-disks so systems with / on lvm2 killed

2009-10-16 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 16 October 2009 03:08:36 Joe wrote: > So could I ask what the correct answer actually is? What combination of > packages do we need to maintain an unbroken operating system which > depends on both lvm2 and gnome? AFAIK, there isn't one in sid alone. You may be able to pull some packages

Re: sid dist-upgrade: lvm2 conflicts with devicekit-disks so systems with / on lvm2 killed

2009-10-16 Thread Javier Barroso
gnome stuff bring in > devicekit-disks > and > > 1. lvm2 requires dmsetup > 2. devicekit-disks conflicts with dmsetup > 3. gnome-control-center and other gnome crap need devicekit-disks > 4. so lvm2 and dmsetup get kicked out to rc status > 5. then you can't boot with your k

Re: sid dist-upgrade: lvm2 conflicts with devicekit-disks so systems with / on lvm2 killed

2009-10-16 Thread Michael Biebl
Joe wrote: > Michael Biebl wrote: >> Mitchell Laks wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I recently did a sid dist-upgrade, and could no longer boot using >>> linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem kernel >>> and had to boot off an old 2.6.26 kernel. >> .. >> >>> This is a problem. >>> >> I guess the real problem is,

Re: sid dist-upgrade: lvm2 conflicts with devicekit-disks so systems with / on lvm2 killed

2009-10-16 Thread Joe
Michael Biebl wrote: Mitchell Laks wrote: Hi, I recently did a sid dist-upgrade, and could no longer boot using linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem kernel and had to boot off an old 2.6.26 kernel. .. This is a problem. I guess the real problem is, that you should be more careful when doing

Re: sid dist-upgrade: lvm2 conflicts with devicekit-disks so systems with / on lvm2 killed

2009-10-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Mitchell Laks wrote: > Hi, > > I recently did a sid dist-upgrade, and could no longer boot using > linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem kernel > and had to boot off an old 2.6.26 kernel. .. > > This is a problem. > I guess the real problem is, that you should be more careful when doing dist-upg

sid dist-upgrade: lvm2 conflicts with devicekit-disks so systems with / on lvm2 killed

2009-10-15 Thread Mitchell Laks
conflicts with dmsetup 3. gnome-control-center and other gnome crap need devicekit-disks 4. so lvm2 and dmsetup get kicked out to rc status 5. then you can't boot with your kernel if / is on lvm2 and / on lvm2 is a prominent choice in the standard debian lenny install disk. I got /dev/sda1 as

Re: nis user and group id conflicts with user and group id for libuuid on nis client

2008-10-22 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday 22 October 2008, BERGY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'nis user and group id conflicts with user and group id for libuuid on nis client': >I added a nis user 'sushmita' on the server. The server is running >cent os. She can login on the server (nat

nis user and group id conflicts with user and group id for libuuid on nis client

2008-10-22 Thread BERGY
Dear All, subject: user and group id for nis user conflicts with user and group d for libuuid on client running debian lenny We are having nfs + nis setup at our workplace. I added a nis user 'sushmita' on the server. The server is runni

Re: CC version conflicts--kernel vs nvidia driver

2008-06-11 Thread Graeme Tank
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:41:52PM +0300, David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 20:18:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > I have nvidia's "proprietary" dirver 96.43.01 running well on my > > > Debian Sid. There is a bug in the opengl which will show up, for > > > example, rotating a piece i

Re: CC version conflicts--kernel vs nvidia driver

2008-06-10 Thread David Baron
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 20:18:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have nvidia's "proprietary" dirver 96.43.01 running well on my > > Debian Sid. There is a bug in the opengl which will show up, for > > example, rotating a piece in a jigsaw puzzle program, where areas > > near the cursor are incorrec

Re: CC version conflicts--kernel vs nvidia driver

2008-06-10 Thread Nyizsnyik Ferenc
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:40:18 -0400 "H.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Removing binaries from /usr/bin doesn't seem right to me. > > ->HS > /usr/bin/gcc is only a symbolic link to one of the versions of gcc, like gcc-3.4, gcc-4.2, etc, not a binary. And I tried update-alternatives first, but:

Re: CC version conflicts--kernel vs nvidia driver

2008-06-10 Thread H.S.
Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote: The following helped me: # cd /usr/bin # rm gcc # ln -s gcc-4.1 gcc After compiling the kernel module, you can redo the steps above with gcc-4.3, or you can leave it this way. if all you want is to use gcc-4.1, how about using: $> CC=gcc-4.1 make progname I guess

Re: CC version conflicts--kernel vs nvidia driver

2008-06-10 Thread Nyizsnyik Ferenc
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:51:49 +0300 David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have nvidia's "proprietary" dirver 96.43.01 running well on my > Debian Sid. There is a bug in the opengl which will show up, for > example, rotating a piece in a jigsaw puzzle program, where areas > near the cursor are

CC version conflicts--kernel vs nvidia driver

2008-06-10 Thread David Baron
I have nvidia's "proprietary" dirver 96.43.01 running well on my Debian Sid. There is a bug in the opengl which will show up, for example, rotating a piece in a jigsaw puzzle program, where areas near the cursor are incorrectly painted. Their driver is up to version .05 so I tried to install. T

Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed

2007-10-30 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:18:02 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean: > > > > > > tetex

Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed

2007-10-30 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On 10/29/07, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 15:24:00 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean: > > > > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is t

Re: tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed

2007-10-29 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:24:00PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Could someone please let me know what this is supposed to mean: > > tetex-base: Conflicts: jadetex (<= 3.13-6) but 3.13-6 is to be installed > > Command: > > $ sudo apt-get install docbook

  1   2   3   4   >