On 2008-04-10 13:27 +0200, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> It appears emacs 21 and dictionaries-common have a fight going on and
> dpkg is caught in the middle.
Could you please elaborate what the problem is? I.e., post the error
messages here.
> This is the second time I ran into
> their squabble.
Wh
It appears emacs 21 and dictionaries-common have a fight going on and dpkg
is caught in the middle. This is the second time I ran into their
squabble. Does anyone know what the back story is and if there's likely
to be a treaty signed in the near future?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
I am having a problem with two packages, nvidia-glx-legacy and
nvidia-glx-new (and it's on an upgrade to Ubuntu Feisty -- I tried a new
driver). I tried to remove both of them so I could reinstall them.
Supposedly neither one is installed and I've tried using dpkg with remove
and purge to get rid
Hi,
I am trying to develop this game under Debian Woody 3.0r2 (very cutomized though)
using plib and
the OpenGL libraries. To run the application I need mesag3. The thing is that when I
do an
"apt-get install mesag3" (using the unstable releases) apt tells me that it needs to
get rid of
the fol
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 08:41 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
> Use the grep-dctrl package. Example, to see all packages with
> priority required do
>
> grep-available -Fpriority required -sPackage | less
>
> and you get a list of packages you don't want to mess with. Never
> try to upgrade these packa
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:11:26 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it's longer ago I wanted to install a package from source. I
> don't remember what kind of source-tarball I installed by using
> auto-apt, but it was a developer version, the newest available.
Ok, but learn
Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2002 22:11 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
> How can I directly see that I have to do with a _base_ -package,
> like libc6 or coreutils?
.. that I have to deal with a a _base_ -package...
sorry about my broken english :-(
regards
gerhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 23:08 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:26:04 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > debian:/usr/src# apt-get remove coreutils
> > [...]You are about to do something potentially harmful
> > To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I s
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:52:06 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Montag, 30. September 2002 05:35 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
>> though. What does apt-get -u upgrade
>> currently say?
>
> Hello Faheem,
>
> Thank you for your response. Unfortunately I'd already overwritten
> the '
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:26:04 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debian:/usr/src# apt-get remove coreutils
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> coreutils
> WARNING: The following essential packages will
Hello Faheem,
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 17:52 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
> I don't knoww if it's possible
> to remove it. If it's possible I think I have to reinstall
> shellutils, textutils, and fileutils.
debian:/usr/src# apt-get remove coreutils
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dep
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 05:35 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
> though. What does apt-get -u upgrade
> currently say?
Hello Faheem,
Thank you for your response. Unfortunately I'd already overwritten
the 'coreutils-packages' of sarge (shellutils and textutils) with
their newest versions. That means
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:52:42 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debian:/home/gerhard# apt-cache show coreutils | grep shellutils
> Replaces: textutils, shellutils, fileutils, stat
> Provides: textutils, shellutils, fileutils
>
> I think it's impossible to remove coreutils now.
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:52:42 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 21:23 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
>> What can I do now to progress with dist-upgrade.
> I did
> dpkg --force-overwrite -i shellutils_2.0.12-2_i386.deb
> dpkg --force-overwrite -i textut
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 21:23 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
> What can I do now to progress with dist-upgrade.
I did
dpkg --force-overwrite -i shellutils_2.0.12-2_i386.deb
dpkg --force-overwrite -i textutils_2.1-1_i386.deb
Now the dist-upgrade is progressing.
coreutils are only available in
Hi all,
I got a wired problem upgrading woody to sarge. I'm not able to
upgrade shellutils.
I had setup preferences and sources list for pinning with unstable.
This might be the reason of my problem.
Now I got only testing and stable/upgrade (security) in my sources
list and I moved preferenc
>> The debian package management system is neat but let's say you want to
>> read the docs and man page of a conflicting package. Then you must
>> drive the original package off the system to install the new package
>> just for a look, or otherwise jump thru hoops? Assume I've got the 8
>> woody
Dan Jacobson writes:
> Why aren't leafnode and noffle marked as conflicting packages?
File a bug.
> OK, I suppose I will manually have to disconnect leafnode from the NNTP
> port and connect noffle.
Why not just shut down or remove the one you aren't using?
> I still
I installed noffle but emacs' gnus still connects to leafnode. Why
aren't leafnode and noffle marked as conflicting packages?
OK, I suppose I will manually have to disconnect leafnode from the
NNTP port and connect noffle.
BTW I still haven't met an offline reader that can ha
--- Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The debian package management system is neat but let's say you want
> to
> read the docs and man page of a conflicting package. Then you must
> drive the original package off the system to install the new package
> just for a look, or otherwise jump th
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 11:12:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 03:31:23PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > The debian package management system is neat but let's say you want to
> > read the docs and man page of a conflicting package. Then you must
> > drive the original pac
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 03:31:23PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> The debian package management system is neat but let's say you want to
> read the docs and man page of a conflicting package. Then you must
> drive the original package off the system to install the new package
> just for a look, or o
On 22-Jun-2002 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> The debian package management system is neat but let's say you want to
> read the docs and man page of a conflicting package. Then you must
> drive the original package off the system to install the new package
> just for a look, or otherwise jump thru hoops?
The debian package management system is neat but let's say you want to
read the docs and man page of a conflicting package. Then you must
drive the original package off the system to install the new package
just for a look, or otherwise jump thru hoops? Assume I've got the 8
woody CD's and no net
24 matches
Mail list logo
