Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-25 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:49:57PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 18:09 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > > David Guntner: > > > > > > As you can see, I'm a BIG believer in separation of filesystems. > > > > Judging from your usage of "df -k" (instead of -g or -h) and the number

Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread Rick Thomas
On Jun 24, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote: David Guntner: Jochen Spieker grabbed a keyboard and wrote: Judging from your usage of "df -k" (instead of -g or -h) and the number of filesystems, you should probably apply at IBM. :-> And yes, I had the great misfortune of being an a

Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread Jochen Spieker
David Guntner: > Jochen Spieker grabbed a keyboard and wrote: >> >> Judging from your usage of "df -k" (instead of -g or -h) and the number >> of filesystems, you should probably apply at IBM. :-> > > And yes, I had the great misfortune of being an administrator of an AIX > system (on the subject

Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 09:31 -0700, David Guntner wrote: > I've heard about LVM but really don't know that much about it. I tested it in a virtual machine, learned how to handle it and forget how to handle it. Btw. I separately mount data partitions, since this is useful for my needs. $ df -h Fil

Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 18:09 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > David Guntner: > > > > As you can see, I'm a BIG believer in separation of filesystems. > > Judging from your usage of "df -k" (instead of -g or -h) and the number > of filesystems, you should probably apply at IBM. :-> > > Seriously, y

Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread David Guntner
Jochen Spieker grabbed a keyboard and wrote: > David Guntner: >> >> As you can see, I'm a BIG believer in separation of filesystems. > > Judging from your usage of "df -k" (instead of -g or -h) and the number > of filesystems, you should probably apply at IBM. :-> LOL - Hey, I *said* I was old-s

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-24 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > Hi Hans :) > > On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 17:32 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Did I mention, I am a professionel? :) > This was just a little joke. :) > There's no need to mention this, because this is what my guess was. All > you've written sounds

Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread Jochen Spieker
David Guntner: > > As you can see, I'm a BIG believer in separation of filesystems. Judging from your usage of "df -k" (instead of -g or -h) and the number of filesystems, you should probably apply at IBM. :-> Seriously, you should really look into LVM. It provides way more flexibility than DOS

Re: Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013 schrieb David Guntner: > Hans-J. Ullrich grabbed a keyboard and wrote: > > Oh, and please do not misunderstand. Of course, I know, that an extra > > partition is not really needed for /home. It is just a nice-to-have. I > > just wanted to point on things, which might be an

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-24 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Hi Hans :) On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 17:32 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Did I mention, I am a professionel? :) There's no need to mention this, because this is what my guess was. All you've written sounds plausible, but IMO less is more for an averaged home PC. However, regarding to have a separa

Separate partitions for filesystems (was Re: computer rendered un-usable)

2013-06-24 Thread David Guntner
Hans-J. Ullrich grabbed a keyboard and wrote: > Oh, and please do not misunderstand. Of course, I know, that an extra > partition is not really needed for /home. It is just a nice-to-have. I just > wanted to point on things, which might be an advantage for one or another > users needs or wishes.

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-24 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:52:34 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich > wrote: > > Hi Hans :) > Hi Ralf, > In my home there are exactly those configs you mentioned, but no data, > such as large audio productions, just a few pics etc., however, if my > Linux gets br

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-24 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:52:34 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: Hi Hans :) First, when your system is so bad damaged, that you need to reinstall the complete OS, all the setting of the can stay untouchable. These are passwords, desktop settings, addressbooks and whatever. In my home there are

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-24 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
> Yes, for the swap I agree, regarding to /home there aren't real advantages > on a home PC, when disk space was expensive it had a disadvantage, since > the user had to take care how to allocate the disk space. > > Mounting / as r only isn't really needed, if you install a new Linux and > you wa

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-24 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:59:46 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:46:11AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:56 -0400, Doug wrote: > / and /home and /swap. It usually makes no sense to have it on separated partitions. Not sure what you mean here, but h

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-24 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:46:11AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:56 -0400, Doug wrote: > > / and /home and /swap. > > It usually makes no sense to have it on separated partitions. Not sure what you mean here, but having /home on a separate partition makes a lot of sense.

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-23 Thread Charles Kroeger
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 22:50:04 +0200 Lagun Adeshina wrote: > Hi Guys, >   > I need your help. From what you said and other's advice I would just say you don't need to be a windows or Linux expert you just need to know a basic truth about installing Debian by using their latest installer: Never

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-23 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 14:38 -0500, Kent West wrote: > On 6/23/13 12:46 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:56 -0400, Doug wrote: > >> / and /home and /swap. > > It usually makes no sense to have it on separated partitions. > > > > > > > There are good reasons to have separate par

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-23 Thread Kent West
On 6/23/13 12:46 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:56 -0400, Doug wrote: >> / and /home and /swap. > It usually makes no sense to have it on separated partitions. > > > There are good reasons to have separate partitions, although they are generally less valuable for single-user h

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-23 Thread Kent West
On 6/22/13 3:42 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I need your help. > > 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7 > > 2. I downloaded the win 32 Debian Installer and went through the > procedures I assume you mean you downloaded an installation .ISO and burned it to CD and booted from

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:56 -0400, Doug wrote: > / and /home and /swap. It usually makes no sense to have it on separated partitions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 18:45 -0700, David Christensen wrote: > On 06/22/13 13:42, Lagun Adeshina wrote: > > 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7 > > 2. I downloaded the win 32 Debian Installer and went through the procedures > > 3. On reaching the partitioning option I got a little confused

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-22 Thread Doug
On 06/22/2013 09:45 PM, David Christensen wrote: > On 06/22/13 13:42, Lagun Adeshina wrote: >> 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7 >> 2. I downloaded the win 32 Debian Installer and went through the procedures >> 3. On reaching the partitioning option I got a little confused I had used >

Re: computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-22 Thread David Christensen
On 06/22/13 13:42, Lagun Adeshina wrote: 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7 2. I downloaded the win 32 Debian Installer and went through the procedures 3. On reaching the partitioning option I got a little confused I had used the RAID5 Partition then 4. I went on to stop the installin

computer rendered un-usable

2013-06-22 Thread Lagun Adeshina
Hi Guys,   I need your help. 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7 2. I downloaded the win 32 Debian Installer and went through the procedures 3. On reaching the partitioning option I got a little confused I had used the RAID5 Partition then 4. I went on to stop the installing  5. I c