They come up in chrome. I don't trust my information on chrome. I
regularly delete cookies and stuff and I have done that.
On 10/4/24 1:34 AM, riveravaldez wrote:
El jueves, 3 de octubre de 2024, Maureen L
Thomas escribió:
> I have used firefox for ages without a problem til now. I am using
Yes they appeared all together.
On 10/4/24 12:04 AM, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 10/3/24 22:42, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
On 10/3/24 9:39 PM, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 10/3/24 21:15, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I have used firefox for ages without a problem til now. I am using
the
latest update of debian 1
El jueves, 3 de octubre de 2024, escribió:
> On 10/3/24 21:15, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
>>
>> I have used firefox for ages without a problem til now. I am using the
>> latest update of debian 12, on a HP computer that is using linux quite
>> nicely. Any way all of a sudden there are web pages tha
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:16:06AM -0400, e...@gmx.us wrote:
> On 10/4/24 08:39, Hans wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 4. Oktober 2024, 14:24:47 CEST schrieb Mindaugas:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > https://www.bobevans.com/
> > Looks like this site is blocked. Tested with Firefox-esr, Opera, Chromium
> > and
>
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, Joe wrote:
An Incapsula competitor, ScrapFly, explains why they think the
blocking is primarily Javascript based:
https://scrapfly.io/blog/how-to-avoid-web-scraping-blocking-javascript/
"..javascript is by far the most powerful tool because it allows
arbitrary code executio
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 11:01 AM Joe wrote:
>
> [...]
> I had the site not work in FF with No-Script nor in Opera with no
> restrictions. But we are not getting to the web page at all, so
> JavaScript is not involved. It's a filtering proxy, and We Are Not
> Welcome.
> Now [sic], as far as I can s
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:16:42 +0200 (CEST)
Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 15:24:11 +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> >> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, Joe wrote:
> >>
> > https://www.bobevans.com/
> >> Bob Evans use Incapsula to prevent scrapin
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 15:24:11 +0200, Roger Price wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, Joe wrote:
https://www.bobevans.com/
Bob Evans use Incapsula to prevent scraping. Probably a waste of money.
Scrapers will scrape and real customers are driven away.
As a
On 10/4/24 08:39, Hans wrote:
Am Freitag, 4. Oktober 2024, 14:24:47 CEST schrieb Mindaugas:
Hello.
https://www.bobevans.com/
Looks like this site is blocked. Tested with Firefox-esr, Opera, Chromium and
Konqueror - all same results (Access denied).
I am using OpenDNS as DNS.
Not blocked for
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 14:07:15 +0100
Joe wrote:
> The same refusal, current Opera and FF 115.15.0esr 64bit. My DNS
> server uses root hints, so not DNS. It's using a security company for
> filtering, I'd guess to US customers only. But IP addresses now have
> only a tenuous link to location...
Hmmm
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 15:24:11 +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, Joe wrote:
>
> > > > https://www.bobevans.com/
> > The same refusal, current Opera and FF 115.15.0esr 64bit. My DNS server
> > uses root hints, so not DNS. It's using a security company for
> > filtering, I'd guess to
On 10/4/24 05:36, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 4 Oct 2024 00:04 -0400, from e...@gmx.us:
eben@cerberus:~$ apt list --installed | grep firef
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
firefox-esr/stable-security,proposed-updates,now 115.15.0esr-1~deb12u1 amd64
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024, Joe wrote:
https://www.bobevans.com/
The same refusal, current Opera and FF 115.15.0esr 64bit. My DNS server
uses root hints, so not DNS. It's using a security company for
filtering, I'd guess to US customers only. But IP addresses now have
only a tenuous link to location...
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 14:39:42 +0200
Hans wrote:
> Am Freitag, 4. Oktober 2024, 14:24:47 CEST schrieb Mindaugas:
> > Hello.
> >
> > https://www.bobevans.com/
> Looks like this site is blocked. Tested with Firefox-esr, Opera,
> Chromium and Konqueror - all same results (Access denied).
>
> I am
Am Freitag, 4. Oktober 2024, 14:24:47 CEST schrieb Mindaugas:
> Hello.
>
> https://www.bobevans.com/
Looks like this site is blocked. Tested with Firefox-esr, Opera, Chromium and
Konqueror - all same results (Access denied).
I am using OpenDNS as DNS.
Best
Hans
Hello.
https://www.bobevans.com/
this site is not working for me. It says "access denied".
https://www.creditkarma.com/
This site works fine.
O tested it with Debian 12 (firefox-esr version) and with Void Linux
(Firefox standard version).
On 10/4/24 12:39, Bret Busby wrote:
On 4/10/24 17
On 4/10/24 17:36, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 4 Oct 2024 00:04 -0400, from e...@gmx.us:
eben@cerberus:~$ apt list --installed | grep firef
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
firefox-esr/stable-security,proposed-updates,now 115.15.0esr-1~deb12u1 amd64
On 4 Oct 2024 00:04 -0400, from e...@gmx.us:
>>> eben@cerberus:~$ apt list --installed | grep firef
>>>
>>> WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in
>>> scripts.
>>>
>>> firefox-esr/stable-security,proposed-updates,now 115.15.0esr-1~deb12u1
>>> amd64 [installed]
>
El jueves, 3 de octubre de 2024, Maureen L Thomas
escribió:
> I have used firefox for ages without a problem til now. I am using the
latest update of debian 12, on a HP computer that is using linux quite
nicely. Any way all of a sudden there are web pages that no longer open on
firefox. Credit K
On 10/3/24 22:42, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
On 10/3/24 9:39 PM, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 10/3/24 21:15, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I have used firefox for ages without a problem til now. I am using the
latest update of debian 12, on a HP computer that is using linux quite
nicely. Any way all of a sud
This is what I got doing the apt:
firefox-esr-l10n-en-ca/stable-security,proposed-updates,now
115.15.0esr-1~deb12u1 all [installed]
firefox-esr-l10n-en-gb/stable-security,proposed-updates,now
115.15.0esr-1~deb12u1 all [installed]
firefox-esr/stable-security,proposed-updates,now 115.15.0esr-1~de
On 10/3/24 21:15, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I have used firefox for ages without a problem til now. I am using the
latest update of debian 12, on a HP computer that is using linux quite
nicely. Any way all of a sudden there are web pages that no longer open on
firefox. Credit Karma, our local Bo
I have used firefox for ages without a problem til now. I am using the
latest update of debian 12, on a HP computer that is using linux quite
nicely. Any way all of a sudden there are web pages that no longer open
on firefox. Credit Karma, our local Bob Evans rest., and a couple of
others.
On 29/04/2024 08:13, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
But in the wrong direction, in many ways.
Please forward this mail to the Debian department; Update and Upgrade
There is no "Debian department" -- this is a volunteer project.
Help out!
Please do not feed the troll. His place is in ignore filter.
On 2024-04-29 at 03:13, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 06:03:46AM +, crackmap wrote:
>
>> hello
>>
>> large complaint
>
> But in the wrong direction, in many ways.
>
>> Please forward this mail to the Debian department; Upda
Debian is running 115.10 also. Sounds like you need to go complain to
Kali devs.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 7:18 AM crackmap wrote:
>
> hello
>
> large complaint
>
> Please forward this mail to the Debian department; Update and Upgrade
>
> thank you in advance ! ! !
&
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 06:03:46AM +, crackmap wrote:
> hello
>
> large complaint
But in the wrong direction, in many ways.
> Please forward this mail to the Debian department; Update and Upgrade
There is no "Debian department" -- this is a volunteer project.
Hel
hello
large complaint
Please forward this mail to the Debian department; Update and Upgrade
thank you in advance ! ! !
I'm really pissed off !!!
why does Kali-Linux not get Firefox-ESR update for months ? ? ?
Kali-Linux is running with version Firefox-ESR 115. 8 and we are, howeve
Greetings from Epson!
We acknowledge your concern and regret for the inconvenience caused.
We would like to inform you that, we have registered your complaint. The Job
Request Number for your reference is “ INC1005366720”.
EASC NAME :JR SERVICES
CONTACT PERSON:Mr. Jairam Sahu
CONTACT NO
Reference: Communication over Facebook messenger.
Dear Epson, I am sick and suffering from cold and cough. So I cannot
communicate with you over Phone. Kindly provide me complaint number or
link to re-register my complain.
Regards,
Prit Ranjan Jha.
On 10/5/18, PritRanjan Jha wrote:
>
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On 2016年12月21日 下午11:54, Oleg Pykhalov wrote:
deloptes writes:
> I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently
> I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
>
> glxgears looks good, but after installin
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On 2016年12月23日 上午1:24, Xen wrote:
I am trying to get a webserver to run under my regular user, or at least
to have the website's files under control of my regular user, but the
webserver runs as www-data.
But it seems I cannot do ch
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On 2016年12月22日 上午4:49, M.A. Perry wrote:
Dear People,
A simple question for which I have so far found no
answer in the Debian documentation. My computer
is a domestic, Debian 8.6 AMD-64 box that uses
apt-get and aptitude for ugrades
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On 2016年12月22日 上午4:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hi,
I've just read the latest news and I was pleasantly surprised, please read it
here http://pol.robimlaw.com/dedf
Looking forward, Samuel Thibault
From: p
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On 2016年12月22日 上午1:12, Pete Orrall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 PM, deloptes wrote:
> I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently
> I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x.
>
> glxgears loo
J Mo writes:
> This new maintainer has caused a lot of problems because they,
> admittedly, don't use the package themselves and don't really
> understand it.
This is, I think, one of the better reasons to intervene. If there are
willing maintainers among the actual user community for a package,
lea...@debian.org
First, though, you should contact the maintainer and offer to help.
Many Debian packages are maintained by groups.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Hello!
Is there any standard method for filing a complaint against a Debian
package maintainer?
Unfortunately, a package that is important to me has been picked up by a
new maintainer after the old one abandoned it.
This new maintainer has caused a lot of problems because they
the obvious default is whatever kernel /vmlinuz points to.
>
> I made a custom entry to do just that - but why isn't it in the debian
> version, and why isn't it the default? Am I missing a config setting here?
I'll respond to the complaint with a bit of history. Someone may
Maybe I'm missing something here.
update-grup creates a grub.cfg with menuentrys for every kernel it can
find - except a menu entry using /vmlinuz on the current root as the kernel!
But in
debian, the obvious default is whatever kernel /vmlinuz points to.
I made a custom entry to do just that -
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:30:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dt> I don't know what this line
> [Desktops.OpenDoc http://carnot.yi.org/] is for.
>
> The message "signature". OK, I've demarcated
> it better.
>
> Thanks,... Peter E.
>
>
> Epilogue or Signature
icular, I was on the wrong track about
the complaint from Xfce[GNOME]. resolvconf
doesn't settle it. In addition to the first line
"127.0.0.1 ..." I need
"127.0.1.1 joule.petershouse.invalid joule".
Actually the html document doesn't mention the
but the wiki does.
Hello.
Easthope, 11.01.2007 20:56:
> I had a machine configured with a static address
> and subsequently changed it to use dhcp. Now
> this message pops up when Xfce is started.
Guess you should have better asked that on the Xfce ML, but anyways:
> "Could not look up internet address for comp
Hello Debian users,
I had a machine configured with a static address
and subsequently changed it to use dhcp. Now
this message pops up when Xfce is started.
"Could not look up internet address for computer.
This will prevent Xfce from operating correctly.
It may be possible to correct the prob
--Original Message-
From: lee gruenfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 8:22 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Very old posted HP DESKJET 932C complaint
I have two HP Deskjet printers (722C & 940C) that have stopped printing
yellow. It's
I have two HP Deskjet printers (722C & 940C) that have stopped
printing yellow. It's not the cartridges and it'snot the computer.
There are hundreds of postings about this problem on the Internet,
and no solutions. HP itself insists it's the cartridges, even if the
cartridges work just fine in
what are you dooing? the first rule is "do not
confuse the custermer" I AM CON FUSED> Why woulld you change a perfictly good
system that has made you rich? are you snorting GUN POWDER? Or ARE YOU
SUFFERING FRON GEEKEFECT?
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:27, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 17:23, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 17:35, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> > > Hubert Chan wrote:
> > > >>"Joseph" == Joseph A Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
> >
> > Evolution supports filtering base
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 17:23, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 17:35, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> > Hubert Chan wrote:
> > >>"Joseph" == Joseph A Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
>
> Evolution supports filtering based on custom headers - has from back
> during the "Milestone" d
Hi Gary!
> I'm using gnus, via GNU Emacs. It's a bear to set up, but I've been
> using it since the Epoch (I exaggerate, slightly) and when I used to
> read Usenet it was nice to have a common front-end for mail and
> news. That and mail expiry, which I believe Mutt can now do, were my
> main moti
Craig Dickson was roused into action on 2003-02-27 01:50 and wrote:
[snip]
yourself and submit it)? As with the filtering question that started
this thread, improving your client (or replacing it with a better one)
is a better solution than demanding that the rest of the world bend over
backward fo
> Still, there is no reason to BCC the list. Not everyone has the ability
> to customize what their filters filter on (I'm sure there are more then
> a few Evolution and OE users on the list).
I'm an Outlook/pine/SquirrelMail user and instead of filtering
on each client, I do the smart thing and d
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nick Hastings wrote:
snip>
>> Hmm? I agree that "reply to" should reply back to the origin of
>> the email. However the list is _not_ the origin of the email! The
>> original sender is the origin by definitio
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> --text follows this line--
>>
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be i
Alvin Oga wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Also, see http://incanus.net/~nnorman/sound/spam.au
and the rest of the spam sounds
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/spam.sounds/
mpeg samples for testing your sound/video/ra players
http://www.Linux-Video.net/Samples
c ya
alvi
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 08:14, Clive Standbridge wrote:
> On Wed 26 Feb 2003 18:23:18 +(-0500), Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> [...]
> > Old Netscape and versions of mail, Mail and
> > mailx that haven't been updated may well not be able to handle custom
> > header filtering as well,
>
> For the record,
Nick Hastings wrote:
Hmm? I agree that "reply to" should reply back to the origin of the
email. However the list is _not_ the origin of the email! The original
sender is the origin by definition.
That is true. The original sender is the origin by definition, but that
point of origin changes once
* Joseph A Nagy Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030228 14:21]:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >--text follows this line--
> >
> >>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > > Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be implimented on
> > > the l
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
--text follows this line--
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be implimented on
> the list itself.
Not without breaking the original functionality of Reply to
I don't agree. I t
--text follows this line--
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be implimented on
> the list itself.
Not without breaking the original functionality of Reply to
> Why list-masters d
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Also, see http://incanus.net/~nnorman/sound/spam.au
and the rest of the spam sounds
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/spam.sounds/
mpeg samples for testing your sound/video/ra players
http://www.Linux-Video.net/Samples
c ya
alvin
--
To UNS
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:31:49AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:51:29PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Who is BCCing you? Is this a real person on this list or a SPAMMER. I
> > do get few strange BCC messages or bounce messages from SPAMMER. They
> > harvest addresses fr
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:51:29PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Who is BCCing you? Is this a real person on this list or a SPAMMER. I
> do get few strange BCC messages or bounce messages from SPAMMER. They
> harvest addresses from many places and send us a SPAM.
SPAM is a brand of meat. Unsolicit
>
> *shrugs* Doesn't matter. I made my complaint, suggestions were made, I'm
> happy with the outcome, even if it wasn't the one I wanted.
Actually, it may not have been
I am slightly confused about this thread. So excuse me if I am wrong.
I CCed you since no Reply-t
> "Mike" == Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Mike> I prefer if people DO cc me, it's much easier to see that someone
Mike> replied to me, without having to remember what thread I was
Mike> talking in, and checking all the replies.
My MUA (gnus, if you're too lazy to check the h
Craig Dickson wrote:
is a better solution than demanding that the rest of the world bend over
backward for your defective software.
Craig
How am I asking the rest of the world to bend over backwards?
*shrugs* Doesn't matter. I made my complaint, suggestions were made, I'm
happ
On Wed 26 Feb 2003 18:23:18 +(-0500), Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
[...]
> Old Netscape and versions of mail, Mail and
> mailx that haven't been updated may well not be able to handle custom
> header filtering as well,
For the record, Netscape 4 does custom header filtering.
[...]
--
Cheers,
Clive
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 07:18:46PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, nate wrote:
>
> > I get cc'd or bcc'd on almost every post that someone replies to me, it
> > would be nice if people didn't do that but it's not a big deal to me.
>
> I prefer if people DO cc me, it's much easie
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be implimented on the
> list itself. Why list-masters don't do this is so far beyond me that I
> don't even bother asking anymore
It's because that's the wrong place for it. If you put a Reply-To:
header in, then it's a p
Monte Milanuk wrote:
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Okay. I take that back. It appears that I can customize my filters.
Just noticed that.
Still, there is no reason to BCC the list. Not everyone has the
ability to customize what their filters filter on (I'm sure there are
more then a few Evolution an
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Okay. I take that back. It appears that I can customize my filters.
Just noticed that.
Still, there is no reason to BCC the list. Not everyone has the
ability to customize what their filters filter on (I'm sure there are
more then a few Evolution and OE users on the lis
On February 26, 2003 06:40 pm, Cam Ellison wrote:
> * Hugh Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:07:16PM -0600, Ray wrote:
> > > > (I'm sure there are more then a few Evolution and OE users on
> > > > the list).
> > >
> > > what are people on the debian-user list using
* Hugh Saunders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:07:16PM -0600, Ray wrote:
> > > (I'm sure there are more then a few Evolution and OE users on the list).
> >
> > what are people on the debian-user list using for there primary machine(s)?
> >
> > the last few messages i see
Mike Dresser wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, nate wrote:
I get cc'd or bcc'd on almost every post that someone replies to me, it
would be nice if people didn't do that but it's not a big deal to me.
I prefer if people DO cc me, it's much easier to see that someone replied
to me, without having to r
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, nate wrote:
> I get cc'd or bcc'd on almost every post that someone replies to me, it
> would be nice if people didn't do that but it's not a big deal to me.
I prefer if people DO cc me, it's much easier to see that someone replied
to me, without having to remember what threa
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:07:16PM -0600, Ray wrote:
> what are people on the debian-user list using for there primary machine(s)?
>
> the last few messages i see are from users of (going by User-Agent or
> X-Mailer header)
> kmail
> mozilla on windows
> mozilla on debian
> xemacs
> mutt
I'm usi
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:07:16PM -0600, Ray wrote:
> > (I'm sure there are more then a few Evolution and OE users on the list).
>
> what are people on the debian-user list using for there primary machine(s)?
>
> the last few messages i see are from users of (going by User-Agent or
> X-Mailer h
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:07:16PM -0600, Ray wrote:
> > (I'm sure there are more then a few Evolution and OE users on the list).
>
> what are people on the debian-user list using for there primary machine(s)?
>
> the last few messages i see are from users of (going by User-Agent or
> X-Mailer h
> "Joseph" == Joseph A Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Joseph> Still, there is no reason to BCC the list. Not everyone has the
Joseph> ability to customize what their filters filter on (I'm sure
Joseph> there are more then a few Evolution and OE users on the list).
I would assert that
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Still, there is no reason to BCC the list. Not everyone has the ability
> to customize what their filters filter on (I'm sure there are more then
> a few Evolution and OE users on the list).
Evolution can't filter on arbitrary headers? Really? I wasn't terribly
impress
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 17:35, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Hubert Chan wrote:
> >>"Joseph" == Joseph A Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > Joseph> Over the past few weeks, I've been recieving several pieces of
> > Joseph> mail directly to my inbox because users are Bcc'ing (for what
> >
Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
> Still, there is no reason to BCC the list. Not everyone has the ability
> to customize what their filters filter on (I'm sure there are more then a
> few Evolution and OE users on the list).
and there's not a lot of point in complaining either, since list members
come an
> (I'm sure there are more then a few Evolution and OE users on the list).
what are people on the debian-user list using for there primary machine(s)?
the last few messages i see are from users of (going by User-Agent or
X-Mailer header)
kmail
mozilla on windows
mozilla on debian
xemacs
mutt
On Mit, 26 Feb 2003 at 15:32 (-0600), Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Over the past few weeks, I've been recieving several pieces of mail
> directly to my inbox because users are Bcc'ing (for what ever reason)
> the debian-user list. I would like to ask those people to please NOT bcc
> the list. If yo
Hubert Chan wrote:
"Joseph" == Joseph A Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> Over the past few weeks, I've been recieving several pieces of
Joseph> mail directly to my inbox because users are Bcc'ing (for what
Joseph> ever reason) the debian-user list. I would like to ask those
Joseph> people
> "Joseph" == Joseph A Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> Over the past few weeks, I've been recieving several pieces of
Joseph> mail directly to my inbox because users are Bcc'ing (for what
Joseph> ever reason) the debian-user list. I would like to ask those
Joseph> people to please NOT
Also sprach Joseph A Nagy Jr (Wed 26 Feb 02003 at 03:32:36PM -0600):
> Over the past few weeks, I've been recieving several pieces of mail
> directly to my inbox because users are Bcc'ing (for what ever reason)
> the debian-user list. I would like to ask those people to please NOT bcc
> the list
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Over the past few weeks, I've been recieving several pieces of mail
> directly to my inbox because users are Bcc'ing (for what ever reason)
> the debian-user list. I would like to ask those people to please NOT bcc
> the list.
Bcc'ing a mailing list seems sort of odd,
Over the past few weeks, I've been recieving several pieces of mail
directly to my inbox because users are Bcc'ing (for what ever reason)
the debian-user list. I would like to ask those people to please NOT bcc
the list. If you must include the list, please place it in your CC or TO
field when
THE RESOLVED CALLING AT HANDS VS HOKUM COMMUNICATIVE HARDSHIP
SETTING PERSONAL LIMITS ON AMUSEMENT ABOUT WHACK THE BUSINESS
Please Note: The following message speaks to believer technical intelligences only.
In wheels, meals and deals at resolutions dimensional accord of care due Seetarfid's
hygie
Sorry, this is an up-to-date woody box with ii kernel-package 7.99.
justin
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002, dman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:01:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | I've tried recompiling the kernel,
>
> This error has nothing to do with SMP. You have probably done one (or
> more) of the following :
>
> o not included your disk driver in the kerne
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:01:43PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I have an Intellistation Z Pro which is a few years old with two Pentium
| II Xeon 450MHz processors.
...
| I've tried recompiling the kernel,
...
| intent of activating SMP support. Upon attempting to boot the new
| kernel, I
Excuse my newbie-ness; I'm not even sure this is a good place to post this
question. If anyone could even point me in a direction where I could get
some information on my problem I'd appreciate it, though.
I have an Intellistation Z Pro which is a few years old with two Pentium
II Xeon 450MHz
I know that there is a multitude of email clients that provide pgp
complaincy. However, as a newbie I am not as well versed in their
advantages/disadvantages (and more importantly user satisfaction).
I would greatly appreciate it if anyone can direct me to a link or
provide information about this t
My PGP (pgp-i 2.6.3a-2) has started to complain about a missing configuration
file, even though it has /etc/pgp-i.conf. Is there a link to somewhere
required? I had some minor disk corruption recently which probably caused
this.
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECT
Thanks ... think I will keep it on the system at this point ... will
delete it if space becomes a problem ... somebody, someday might want it.
> Hit ctrl-C to stop it. recycle to install and answer no to continuing the
> download of the emacs file.
>
George Bonser
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROT
Hit ctrl-C to stop it. recycle to install and answer no to continuing the
download of the emacs file.
On Mon, 12 May 1997, George Bonser wrote:
>
> Well it sure sucks that I have to pick through the list of default
> packages. emacs slipped past me and here I am on the end of a slow dial-up
>
Well it sure sucks that I have to pick through the list of default
packages. emacs slipped past me and here I am on the end of a slow dial-up
downloading a >5 Meg behemoth that I will never use. :(
Sure would be nice if the defaults were a little more dial-up friendly. I
would like to not have
99 matches
Mail list logo
