mess-mate wrote:
> I forgot why isn't there a 3.4.3 gcc on debian. Any special
> reason ?
Yeah, because there's a GCC 4.0.2 now. Also, Debian tends to stick with
proven compilers and 3.4 was probably too new for sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:55:31PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
| > Hi,
| > anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
| > i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
| > What can i do to resolve it ?
| > Thanks i
Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:55:31PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
| > Hi,
| > anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
| > i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
| > What can i do to resolve it ?
| > Thanks i
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:55:31PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
> Hi,
> anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
> i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
> What can i do to resolve it ?
> Thanks in advance
Which sources are you using? Install the
Craig M. Houck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Wh are you compiling gcc.
| Why not simply load the debian (.deb) package for gcc?
| IFor that matter, I thinkg gcc is part of a standard SARGE install.
| Am I missing something here??
|
|
| At 03:55 PM 10/3/2005 +0200, mess-mate wrote:
Wh are you compiling gcc.
Why not simply load the debian (.deb) package for gcc?
IFor that matter, I thinkg gcc is part of a standard SARGE install.
Am I missing something here??
At 03:55 PM 10/3/2005 +0200, mess-mate wrote:
>Hi,
>anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors
Hi,
anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
What can i do to resolve it ?
Thanks in advance
mess-mate
--
You'll be called to a post requiring ability in handling groups o
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:19 pm, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +1300, Andrew Walbran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I
> > am unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program
> > g
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 9:18 pm, Rem wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Is your computer overclocked ?
No. It is running at 350MHz as it is designed to. Also, gcc works fine on my
Fedora Core 1 installation on the same computer so I very much doubt that
this is a hardware problem.
>
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +130
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +1300, Andrew Walbran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I am
> unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program gives a
> number of 'undefined reference' errors:
>
> $ cat test.c
Hi
I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I am
unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program gives a
number of 'undefined reference' errors:
$ cat test.c
int main() {
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
[EMAIL P
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 10:00:04AM -0800, Beiad Ian Q. Dalton wrote:
>
> I'm trying to compile gcc on Potato with the pgcc patches. Patches applied
> cleanly, and I edited the debian/patches/
> patches that didn't apply cleanly (just version changes between `gcc' and
> `pgcc') and ran debian/rul
I'm trying to compile gcc on Potato with the pgcc patches. Patches applied
cleanly, and I edited the debian/patches/
patches that didn't apply cleanly (just version changes between `gcc' and
`pgcc') and ran debian/rules binary.
Now in src/libobjc/gc.c, it can't find gc.h and gc_typed.h, which a
13 matches
Mail list logo
