Hello list,
does somebody know, how I can avoid the check of the kernelversion, when a
kernel module should be compiled?
There are some kernel modules, which inhibit to compile.
I get this error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-173xx'
make -C /usr/src/linux
I work on AVR development under Debian 3.1.
I'd like to install all avr-gnu tools into one directory /usr/local/avr.
Compilation succeeded for:
-- binutils-avr-2.15
-- gcc-avr-3.4.3
-- avr-libc-1.2.3
-- uisp-20050207
But there are compilation problems with:
-- simulavr-0.1.2.2
-- gdb-avr-6.3
-- i
On October 29, 2002 at 6:26AM -0800,
ThomasRatliffDDS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sarge
> Opt soundalsa-source 0.9.0rc3-0. 0.9.0rc3-0. ALSA driver source
> kernel-source-2.4.19
> make[4]: *** [als100.o] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/isa'
> make[3]: *** [
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks
sarge
Opt soundalsa-source 0.9.0rc3-0. 0.9.0rc3-0. ALSA driver source
kernel-source-2.4.19
Following with make-kpkg modules_image (also true when running
debian/rules)
../alsa-kernel/isa/als100.c:154: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
../alsa-k
Debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject:kernel-2.4.12 compile errors
Forwarded by: debian-user@lists.debian.org
I have been trying to compile this kernel using the information
from The Kernel: Configuration and Compilation NHF V1.2 step
by step. First by untarin in /usr/src/-
It is the modutils from unstable. Also I would be
better to get the source from debian? Ok I will try
it that way. Thank-you
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:41:13PM -0500, parn wrote:
> I have been trying to compile this kernel using the information
> from The Kernel: Configuration and Compilation NHF V1.2 step
> by step. First by untarin in /usr/src/-> then make xconfig
> followed by the dep,bzimage. Here is where I get m
I have been trying to compile this kernel using the information
from The Kernel: Configuration and Compilation NHF V1.2 step
by step. First by untarin in /usr/src/-> then make xconfig
followed by the dep,bzimage. Here is where I get my errors. So
I did a little more rtfm and saw about make-kpkg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i'm trying to get mysql-3.23.38 to compile on a debian woody system.
i've already successfully compiled it on one woody system (which i
/thought/ was configured the same . . . but apparently not.
following is the results of my make. any thoughts or s
Hi all-
I recently did the glibc and glibc-dev upgrade to get a new sendmail on the
system. This seemed to break a few things when I go to compile programs. I
downloaded the source for balsa and it complains in the configure script
that it cannot find glib but if I look glib is at /usr/lib. I d
G'day all,
I have had a very frustrating morning trying to compile a new 2.2.17
kernel from the tarball sources for my up-to-date woody machine.
I get a make error on make zImage and on make bzImage, but not on make
vmlinux.
I was tearing my hair out over thisuntil I read the list this
Linus is on vacation :(
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/mnt/hda1/src/linux-2.2.4/linux-2.2.4-vanilla/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486
-malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586 -DMODULE
-DMODVERSIONS -include
/mnt/hda1/src/linux
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 06:22:41PM +1200, John Leget wrote:
> Running potato im coming up against the following with kernel 2.2.4
>
> acct.c: In function `sys_acct':
> acct.c:197: too few arguments to function `filp_close'
> acct.c:203: too few arguments to function `filp_close'
> make[2]: *** [ac
In foo.debian-user, you wrote:
> Running potato im coming up against the following with kernel 2.2.4
>
> acct.c: In function `sys_acct':
> acct.c:197: too few arguments to function `filp_close'
> acct.c:203: too few arguments to function `filp_close'
> make[2]: *** [acct.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leav
Running potato im coming up against the following with kernel 2.2.4
acct.c: In function `sys_acct':
acct.c:197: too few arguments to function `filp_close'
acct.c:203: too few arguments to function `filp_close'
make[2]: *** [acct.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.4/k
> Jesse Lee wrote:
>
> here are the erros I get when I am compiling my kernel.
>
> as86 -o -a [bootsect.o]
> bootsect.s
> make[1]: as86: command not found
> make[1]: *** [bootsect.o] error 127
>
I had the same problem the first time I tried to compile the kernel. You
just need to in
here are the erros I get when I am compiling my
kernel.
as86 -o -a [bootsect.o]
bootsect.s
make[1]: as86: command not found
make[1]: *** [bootsect.o] error 127
make [zimage] Error 2
then it stops and the zImage is not
created.
now I am running kernel 2.0.34
I have tried i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Ulrich) writes:
| I just recently abandoned my own linux setup and installed debian (hamm).
| This is a pretty much stock setup -- the only thing un-debian I've done so
| far is change /bin/sh to point to pdksh, but that *shouldn't* be the problem
| because I've compil
On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Chris Ulrich wrote:
:
: I just recently abandoned my own linux setup and installed debian (hamm).
: This is a pretty much stock setup -- the only thing un-debian I've done so
: far is change /bin/sh to point to pdksh, but that *shouldn't* be the problem
: because I've com
I just recently abandoned my own linux setup and installed debian (hamm).
This is a pretty much stock setup -- the only thing un-debian I've done so
far is change /bin/sh to point to pdksh, but that *shouldn't* be the problem
because I've compiled many kernels with my old setup where I didn't
One of my clients is setting up a new hamm machine. Base-install plus default
config(what is already marked in dselect) is installed. Kernel source package
2.033, and the kernel packager are installed. The kernel compiles OK but the
package is not created. The last page of the output is attache
Hi all, (Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], i'm currently off the list)
My current system :
Tyan TomcatIII Duel Board (S1563D)
Pentium Class 430 HX
2 Pentium 200 Non-MMX processors
64 mgs ram (mixed 70s/60s unfortunatly)
120 mgs swap partition
On Sat, Apr 04, 1998 at 06:07:23AM -0700, ninjaz wrote:
> The lines it are complaining about are:
> 90 typedef int bool;
> 91 #ifdef __cplusplus
> 92 const bool false = 0;
> 93 const bool true = 1;
> 94 #else
This is evil; there is a built in bool type with the new g++
and
Since getting hamm updates today, nothing wants to compile.. everything
ends up with a few pages of errors after hitting the first file. Are
there any fixes out for this?
libg++27-dev was not initially installed, but I tried plugging it in to
see if it would make a difference, to no avail. (lib
24 matches
Mail list logo
