Mladen Adamovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You probably have AnyMeal related problem so the better idea is to use
> anymeal mailing list or forums.
> Most probably you are using different version of Xalan-C then the
> AnyMeal's authors.
I was guessing something like that. The thing that confu
Matthias Julius wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build AnyMeal (http://anymeal.sourceforge.net). When
running make I get following error:
You probably have AnyMeal related problem so the better idea is to use
anymeal mailing list or forums.
Most probably you are using different version of Xalan-C
Hi,
I am trying to build AnyMeal (http://anymeal.sourceforge.net). When
running make I get following error:
,
| In file included from /usr/include/xalanc/XPath/XPathProcessorImpl.hpp:39,
| from xmlDocument.cpp:27:
| ../xalanc/PlatformSupport/XalanMessageLoader.hpp:29:29: err
I guess it would be the binutils package... Search for the package when you run base-config, to find out.
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote:> Dear Debian Community,> > I just installed Debian 3.0.0r0 from the set of 7 cd's and I a
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote:
> Dear Debian Community,
>
> I just installed Debian 3.0.0r0 from the set of 7 cd's and I am very
> excited about it
> (and a new user to debian).
>
> I have, however a problem compiling any kind of C - Files.
>
> I first tried co
Dear Debian Community,
I just installed Debian 3.0.0r0 from the set of 7 cd's and I am very
excited about it
(and a new user to debian).
I have, however a problem compiling any kind of C - Files.
I first tried compiling the kernbel source and got errors; then i write
a small
hello-word program
> Kevin Smith said:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > When I try to compile Glibe3 from source on Debian Woody 3.0r1
powerpc, I
> > get the following errors.
>
> how about apt-get install libglide3 ?
>
> or if you want to build it:
>
> apt-get -b source libglide3 ?
>
> the source one requires you have source uri
Kevin Smith said:
> Hi All,
>
> When I try to compile Glibe3 from source on Debian Woody 3.0r1 powerpc, I
> get the following errors.
how about apt-get install libglide3 ?
or if you want to build it:
apt-get -b source libglide3 ?
the source one requires you have source uris in /etc/apt/sources.
Hi All,
When I try to compile Glibe3 from source on Debian Woody 3.0r1 powerpc,
I get the following errors.
bagpuss:/home/admin/Glide3# ./build.3dfx
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda8 2064208501328 1458024 26% /home
Making all in swlib
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 06:33, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Don't have grep-available
>
> It's in the grep-dctrl package, one of the ones I install on any Debian
> system I find myself running.
Thanks, it looks usefull so I'll install it
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 06:09:04AM +1100, bob parker wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 04:58, Colin Watson wrote:
> > $ grep-available -P uuid
[...]
> Don't have grep-available
It's in the grep-dctrl package, one of the ones I install on any Debian
system I find myself running.
--
Colin Watson
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 05:05, you wrote:
> Have you done an 'apt-get build-dep parted'? When I tested it, it
> wanted to install "libncurses5-dev libreadline4-dev libreiserfs0.3-0
> libreiserfs0.3-dev uuid-dev" so uuid-dev is probably what you are
> looking for...
apt-get build-dep .. got nowhere but
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 04:58, Colin Watson wrote:
> $ grep-available -P uuid
> Package: uuid-dev
> Priority: extra
> Section: devel
> Installed-Size: 104
> Maintainer: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Architecture: i386
> Source: e2fsprogs (1.29+1.30-WIP-0930-2)
> Version: 1.2-1.29+1
bob parker wrote:
I'm running Woody and attempting to compile the latest parted
(1.6.3)
I get the following ./configure error
checking for uuid_generate in -luuid... no
configure: error: GNU Parted requires libuuid - a part of the e2fsprogs
package (but sometimes distributed separately in uuid-
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 04:19:49AM +1100, bob parker wrote:
> checking for uuid_generate in -luuid... no
> configure: error: GNU Parted requires libuuid - a part of the e2fsprogs
> package (but sometimes distributed separately in uuid-devel or similar)
$ grep-available -P uuid
Package: uuid-d
I'm running Woody and attempting to compile the latest parted
(1.6.3)
I get the following ./configure error
checking for uuid_generate in -luuid... no
configure: error: GNU Parted requires libuuid - a part of the e2fsprogs
package (but sometimes distributed separately in uuid-devel or similar)
T
> They usually correspond to the runtime dependencies. Looking at the
> output you gave, libgtk1.2-dev, libgnome-dev, and libsdl1.2-dev would be
> a good start. You might also want gettext.
Gettext was the problem with compilation, thanx for helping me out, mate, i
would have never thought of tha
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:32:34AM +0200, Rox de Gabba wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Did you install the build-dependencies listed in debian/control in the
> > source package? Runtime dependencies are unlikely to be enough. You need
> > a variety of -dev packages.
>
> Do you happen to know wher
> Did you install the build-dependencies listed in debian/control in the
> source package? Runtime dependencies are unlikely to be enough. You need
> a variety of -dev packages.
Do you happen to know where to look for the names of the -dev packages i
need? The sources i got were from a tar.gz fil
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:09:50AM +0200, Rox de Gabba wrote:
> Hey all.. i'm trying to compile xmps and it gives me errors eventhough i have
> all the dependencies that are listed on the site installed on my system.
Did you install the build-dependencies listed in debian/control in the
source pa
Hey all.. i'm trying to compile xmps and it gives me errors eventhough i have
all the dependencies that are listed on the site installed on my system. I
follow the INSTALL file and go ./configure and then make, and make outputs
some cryptic errors. Both outputs, ./configure and make are in the a
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:23:28PM -0400, Vivek Bharathan wrote:
> Hello, I recently reformatted my hard drive and upgraded from potato to
> woody. Previously, under potato, when I upgraded and recompiled my
> kernel, I simply set the config file, typed make dep, and make install
> and configured l
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 12:23, Vivek Bharathan wrote:
> Hello, I recently reformatted my hard drive and upgraded from potato to
> woody. Previously, under potato, when I upgraded and recompiled my
> kernel, I simply set the config file, typed make dep, and make install
> and configured lilo and everyth
On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 22:23, Vivek Bharathan wrote:
> Hello, I recently reformatted my hard drive and upgraded from potato to
> woody. Previously, under potato, when I upgraded and recompiled my
> kernel, I simply set the config file, typed make dep, and make install
> and configured lilo and every
Hello, I recently reformatted my hard drive and upgraded from potato to
woody. Previously, under potato, when I upgraded and recompiled my
kernel, I simply set the config file, typed make dep, and make install
and configured lilo and everything worked fine after that.
Under Woody, however, I did t
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 16:48:41 -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
> now I am having troubles because gnomeConf.sh cannot be found.
Install the package that contains this file.
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents quickly leads to
"libgnome-dev" as the package you're looking for.
H
<< I don't remember the name of that new system, but I do see
'gnome-config' on my woody box. It is in the 'libgnome-dev' package. Try
installing that and see if it helps. >>
libgnome-dev was what I needed.
Problem solved.
Thank you!
(==timothy==)
---
On Fri, Feb 22
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:48:41PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
| I am having some problems compiling my
| first glade application. I have fixed
| several problems so far, but now I am
| having troubles because gnomeConf.sh
| cannot be found.
|
| I tried an apt-get install gnome-libs
| and an ap
I am having some problems compiling my
first glade application. I have fixed
several problems so far, but now I am
having troubles because gnomeConf.sh
cannot be found.
I tried an apt-get install gnome-libs
and an apt-get install gnome-libs-devel,
but neither where found by apt. What
should I ask
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Morgan Terry wrote:
> > On 8 Apr 2001, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> > > > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4
> > mea culpa. it _was_ 11.
> When I was getting sig 11's on my box, it turned out to be a bad CPU
> fan. I replaced it and haven't had any
omicron wrote:
>
> hi..
>
> On 8 Apr 2001, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> > > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4
> mea culpa. it _was_ 11.
<...>
When I was getting sig 11's on my box, it turned out to be a bad CPU
fan. I replaced it and haven't had any problems since.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001, omicron wrote:
> hi..
>
> On 8 Apr 2001, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> > > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4
> mea culpa. it _was_ 11.
Hi,
If it was signal 11, you probably want to run memtest86 as it is quite
possibly a memory error.
'apt-get in
hi..
On 8 Apr 2001, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4
mea culpa. it _was_ 11.
> have you overclocked your system? Well, it is about Signal 11, but
> perhaps it's useful, too: http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/.
perhaps i should upgr
omicron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'm new to Debian and this list. I installed Debian 2.2r2. But
> when i try to compile the kernel 2.4.1 source, then i get the message
>
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4
Is this problem 100% reproducible? If not, i would g
hi
i'm new to Debian and this list. I installed Debian 2.2r2. But
when i try to compile the kernel 2.4.1 source, then i get the message
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 4
i have gcc 2.95.2-13 and libc6 2.1.3.Can you help me out ?
Thanx in advance,
regards
omicro
I have the debian sources for xemacs 20.4-13 and wanted to recompile
it to remove the gpm support. After applying a little filter to the
debian/rules file to get rid of the mule variants:
while() {
print unless /mule/;
next unless /nomule/;
s/\S*canna\S*//g;
s/\S*[-_]mule\S*//g;
Hi,
As root I can compile a program using:
gcc -I /usr/include/X11 -L/usr/X11R6/lib demo.c -lX11
and get an executable a.out.
As a user when I type the same thing I get:
ld:cannot open -lX11: No such file of directory
Do I have to give this user special privledges or something???
How
Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> nope, it will be released about Sep 1st and based on gcc 2.7.2.3
That's good news. Unfortunately, if it's based on 2.7.2.3, that means
there probably won't be a libc5 version of it. If that's going to
inconvenience anybody, let me know, and I'll...see what I can do.
--
Galen Hazelwood wrote:
>Thus Spake Michael Taeschner:
>>Awaiting g77 0.5.21 soon,
>Don't hold your breath. I've heard that it's been indefinitely delayed,
>sort of like gcc 2.8.
Craig Burley is planning the release of g77 0.5.21 on September 1st,
or at least so he wrote two days ago.
--
Thomas
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Aug 1997, Galen Hazelwood wrote:
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:01:44 -0600
> From: Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org
> Subject: G77 (was Re: compilation problems)
> Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 18:04:20 +
>
Thus Spake Michael Taeschner:
>Did you try to install GNU fortran77, the real f77 compiler?
>BTW it comes in version 0.5.20 in stable (though 5.20 is known to have
>bugs), maybe somewhere 0.5.19.1 is somewhere around as .deb?
The bo-updates section has 0.5.19.1.
>Awaiting g77 0.5.21 soon,
Don
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
>Hi,
>
>I apologize for the long message but I figure I'd better lay out all the
>errors. I'm having some unusual compilation problems on a new machine I'm
>setting up. When I try a make depend on some cod
On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Jesse Goldman wrote:
> ii netbase 2.13-1 Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
> ii netstd 2.13-1 Networking binaries and daemons for
> ii f77reorder 2.25-2 f77 compiler script calling f2c/gcc.
> ii sed 2.05-12T
Hi,
I apologize for the long message but I figure I'd better lay out all the
errors. I'm having some unusual compilation problems on a new machine I'm
setting up. When I try a make depend on some code, I often get one or more
of the following errors:
f77 -I./inc -cpp -g -C -
Hi.
I've been trialing the routed included in netstd and it seems _very_ broken
to the point of not establishing routes in the table when one needs to be
added. I believe that from reports about 'routed' on the Internet that
people don't use it because of this and 'gated' is a very powerful and
v
Thank you to everyone responding.
I discovered at one stage that the compilation process was looking for
as86 and that I did not have it. After installing bin86 the problem was
solved.
Johann.
Johann Spies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsorlaan 19
Piete
In preparation for linux 2.1, I recently upgraded binutils to 2.7-3,
and libc5 (& -dev) to 5.4.7. While compiling 2.1.5, it bombed
out saying entry.o not found (in arch/i386/kernel); entry.S was
there, but for some reason wasn't compiled (assembled).
I gave up at the time.
Tonight I'm trying to re
47 matches
Mail list logo
