Ben Pfaff wrote:
>Aren't the problems with having the newsgroups that cluless people
>send stupid messages and spam to the lists? So if we just allow
>people to *read* the lists on newsgroups, but require them to send
>submissions to the e-mail address, then we've got the best of both
>w
Why do you want to do that?
On 13 Dec 1997, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the
spam
>and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
>
> I think that we need to make the newsgroups read-only. Any
> submissions to
I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
I think that we need to make the newsgroups read-only. Any
submissions to the list should be required to come via e-mail.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-ma
> bruce writes:
> I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can
> tolerate the spam and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
Agreed.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
> and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
Ummm, I guess we could:
- shut down the news gateway, and restrict posts to debian-user to those
who are subscribed to it, and make
I'll put up with some of the spam, and as for misdirected mail, welll...
being a complete Linux newbie, I've probably submitted my share. But
I've learned a lot from the folks on this list. I'd sure hate to see it
go
--
Steve Morrill
Reply to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Pub key id: 0xF2459FC
On Fri, 12 Dec 1997, C.L. Daugaard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
> > and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
> >
>
> I agree.
I agree too.
...RickM...
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-ma
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (G John Lapeyre) writes:
> I don't see why people let a little spam get to them. Its bad,
> but its life. About one out of 50 or 100 messages on debian-user is like
It's not that difficult to set up procmail to catch most of the spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I think having our lists on news benefits us, and we can tolerate the spam
> and the mis-directed mail. What do you think?
>
I agree.
--
C.L. Daugaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-ma
personally I find the usenet more efficient since I don't have to
download the complete messages, just the headers
Manos
G John Lapeyre wrote:
>
> On 12 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > My students were messing around with my classroom computer, and now I
> > > have stuff all over the
On 12 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > My students were messing around with my classroom computer, and now I
> > have stuff all over the place. I can't get everything back in proper
> > order. What do I do?
>
> This is obviously a windows user. Because of postings like this,
See
> My students were messing around with my classroom computer, and now I
> have stuff all over the place. I can't get everything back in proper
> order. What do I do?
This is obviously a windows user. Because of postings like this,
and because of all the spam we are getting and all of the cluel
12 matches
Mail list logo
