-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:03:04PM -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Does anyone know why the clamscan in unstable doesn't detect this latest
> virus?
Because nobody's made a good signature of it and submitted it to the
clamav developers? Maybe you're
Fraser Campbell wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know why the clamscan in unstable doesn't detect this latest
virus? clamscan in unstable is 0.60-10, the latest clamscan is 0.65. I
would have thought that the freshclam updater would have fetched the updates
regardless of the version number though.
Fr
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 13:03, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know why the clamscan in unstable doesn't detect this latest
> virus? clamscan in unstable is 0.60-10, the latest clamscan is 0.65. I
> would have thought that the freshclam updater would have fetched the updates
> rega
Fraser Campbell wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know why the clamscan in unstable doesn't detect this latest
virus? clamscan in unstable is 0.60-10, the latest clamscan is 0.65. I
would have thought that the freshclam updater would have fetched the updates
regardless of the version number though.
Fr
Hi,
Does anyone know why the clamscan in unstable doesn't detect this latest
virus? clamscan in unstable is 0.60-10, the latest clamscan is 0.65. I
would have thought that the freshclam updater would have fetched the updates
regardless of the version number though.
Freshclam is claiming that
5 matches
Mail list logo