Re: cdrecord / xcdroast on Sarge / 2.6.8-3 as user - FYI

2006-11-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:04:21 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Don't use the group disk, use group cdrom instead. Anyone in group disk > can read and write direct to the disks (e.g deleting partitions). You > don't want this. Ah, sure ! - I think now it is perfect. Thanks, Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: cdrecord / xcdroast on Sarge / 2.6.8-3 as user - FYI

2006-11-25 Thread Stephan Seitz
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:22:47AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: # ls -l /dev/hdd brw-rw 1 root disk 22, 64 2004-04-30 08:27 /dev/hdd The only thing needed is that your user is member of group 'disk'. The latter shows why. Don’t use the group disk, use group cdrom instead. Anyone in group disk

cdrecord / xcdroast on Sarge / 2.6.8-3 as user - FYI

2006-11-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
Call this redundant (and soon - with Etch - outdated). The archive is full of posts on this topic, but none seems to wrap it up. Instead of you having to to sort it out, try this: 1. All this 'ATAPI' is logically correct, but not technically. Use 'ATA'. 2. 'cdrecord dev=ATA: -scanbus' is the way

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-05-29 Thread Ramiro Aceves
Uwe Dippel escribió: Having read around 100 posts on this list, I am still confused. I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so good. I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially. In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb.

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:48:54 +0100, stephen parkinson wrote: > actually xcdroast works quite nicely, in 2.6 with hdc=cdrom hdd=cdrom > and no ide-scsi anywhere in sight You *think* so; or it *does* ?? Then tell us your secret. I tried ... root=/dev/hda5 hdb=cdrom and re-detected the drive, etc.,

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 10:00, Uwe Dippel wrote: > On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote: > > > I give up. What is wrong with k3b? > > Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the > dependencies ! > That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread stephen parkinson
Marc Wilson wrote: On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so good. Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't lose my burner..

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote: > I give up. What is wrong with k3b? Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the dependencies ! That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can run it from any desktop environment. Non-bloated ones, e.g.:

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Mike Chandler
On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:21 pm, Paul Johnson wrote: > Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far > >> > so good.

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: >> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so >> > good. >> >> Whatwh

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Adam Aube
Marc Wilson wrote: > It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a > single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications > other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*? > > Anyone want to put forward a front-end that does? I use CDR Toaster without problems. A

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 05:10:07 +0200, Marc Wilson wrote: > Ide-scsi will continue to work for some time. It, actually, doesn't. At least, not in all occasions. It is considered broken. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:50:07 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't > lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't. Because you left the scsi-emulation as boot parameter. But it is badly broken in 2.6.X and Linus fully recommen

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:00:08 +0200, Adam Aube wrote: > In your case, since your CD-ROM is /dev/hdb, that should be "hdb=cdrom", not > "hdc=cdrom". Ah, sure. Typo. Question is: *do* I need this boot parameter ?? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so > > good. > > Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't > lose my burner...I'm now confuse

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so > good. Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't. -- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux. You

Re: kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Adam Aube
Uwe Dippel wrote: > I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially. > In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb. > > Some posters say that you need to add hdc=cdrom to your boot > parameters. Is this correct ? Anything needed at all ? In your case, s

kernel 2.6.X and cdrecord / xcdroast

2004-04-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
Having read around 100 posts on this list, I am still confused. I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so good. I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially. In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb. Now the drive is

Re: cdrecord & xcdroast

2002-02-10 Thread Bob Thibodeau
I just reinstalled the newer version so I could see the message. The source is downloading now. that's one down... thanks, Bob On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 08:50:04PM -0900, Greg C. Madden wrote: > On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 20:23, Bob Thibodeau wrote: > > I just fired up my cd writer after a year or so

Re: cdrecord & xcdroast

2002-02-09 Thread Greg C. Madden
On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 20:23, Bob Thibodeau wrote: > I just fired up my cd writer after a year or so, and > some issues came up. snip > Google search fixed this. I'm running kernel 2.2.14 and aparently > the latest cdrecord (used by xcdroast) only works with 2,4 kernels > > I downgraded cdrecord an

cdrecord & xcdroast

2002-02-09 Thread Bob Thibodeau
I just fired up my cd writer after a year or so, and some issues came up. 1. xcdroast now set suid, making gtk refuse to start as user What happened to setting up as root and running later as non-root? Am I forgetting something? Is there a better program for creating data cd's? I made some audio