I had written:
> Even more badly, I mv'd all modules in /lib to my ~/ directory
> expecting the OS still to work assuming all relevant OS routines are
> located in RAM. Bad idea - no 'cp', no 'mv' , no nothing, the system
> is completely useless. I guess if I'm not able to get a small linux
> syst
Andrew wrote:
> >Something must have gone wrong because the system now complains about
> >"unresoloved symboles" after the phrase " calculating module
> >dependancies".
> >
>
> This often happens - did you rm all the old modules first?
> I know this is a little risky, so you probably should take
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
>"make bzImage" helped to create arch/i386/boot/bzImage as you stated.
>I used before make zImage which in fact had put the file in
>arch/i386/boot/compressed/. So the size of about 0.6MB is valid. I was
>just wondering because the 2.0.38 kernel I rec
Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote:
> make clean
> make oldconfig dep bzImage
>
> and bzImage is in arch/i386/boot/bzImage.
>
> How exactly did you try to build your kernel? Did you get any error
> message?
>
> The kernel build process has nothing to do with Debian or any other
> distribution. It j
robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
>
> Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote:
>
[...]
> > A small example of what you call "masochistic":
> >
> > cd /usr/src/linux-2.2.18pre18
> > make config|menuconfig|xconfig
> > make-kpkg --revision 9:blabla kernel_image
> > dpkg -i ../kernel-image-2.2.18pre18_blabla*.deb
>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:00:18PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
> brian moore wrote:
> > > Thats a nice and short explaination - thank you very much! I guess 2a
> > > includes make modules_install and mv's the system.map to the
> > > appropiate place?
> >
> > Yes, it does.
>
> Just got a mess
Andrei Pelinescu - Onciul wrote:
> robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > As far as I'm concerned most distributions and README's recommend to
> > create a linux/ dir as a sub of src/ and I did so.
> > In the end this makes up:
> > /usr/src/linux/kernel-source-2.2.17/arch/i386/boot
> > - after
brian moore wrote:
> > Thats a nice and short explaination - thank you very much! I guess 2a
> > includes make modules_install and mv's the system.map to the
> > appropiate place?
>
> Yes, it does.
Just got a message from another deb user - it didn't.
> > > > and I would really like to understand
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 06:11:30PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
> Carel Fellinger wrote:
> > No, it is a three step process.
> >
> > 0) get the kernel source and apply all the necessary patches
> > 1a) configure the kernel
> > 1b) and compile the kernel
> > 1c) and build a deb file from it c
robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
>
[...]
> As far as I'm concerned most distributions and README's recommend to
> create a linux/ dir as a sub of src/ and I did so.
> In the end this makes up:
> /usr/src/linux/kernel-source-2.2.17/arch/i386/boot
> - after x-tar'ing the kernet-sourcexx.tar.gz. Usually yo
Carel Fellinger wrote:
> Hai Robert Wilhelm,
>
> I think we have a communication problem here, so let's at both sides
> try to be more explicit and maybe a little more informative:)
Thanks for your patience, Carel.
> No, it is a three step process.
>
> 0) get the kernel source and apply all t
Hai Robert Wilhelm,
I think we have a communication problem here, so let's at both sides
try to be more explicit and maybe a little more informative:)
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:18:26PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
...
> Ok, I think I got it. Debian seems to provide a combined
> kernel-compi
Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
> > > Of course I installed all neccessary src's, how would I've launched
> > make xconfig without doing this first?
>
> Nobody said otherwise.
>
> > The kernel compiled without any errors - but which file is the corr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
> Of course I installed all neccessary src's, how would I've launched
> make xconfig without doing this first?
Nobody said otherwise.
> The kernel compiled without any errors - but which file is the co
>
> However, if you use make-kpkg to create your kernel package, you
> should find the *.deb file in the parent directory to the linux
> source.
>
> Good Luck!
Oh my dear - what has happened!
I thought the inquiry was very clear, this has nothing to do with
package installing!
Of course I
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:05:33PM +0100, robert_wilhelm_land wrote:
> Just rebuilt my first 2.2.17 kernel, unfortunatly I'm not able to
> find the kernelimage(!)
OK. This is my second version of my reply email. I had to get my
"brain goalie" back on the ice before I said something nasty. ;-) M
Just rebuilt my first 2.2.17 kernel, unfortunatly I'm not able to find
the kernelimage(!)
The readme reports to look at /usr/src/././arch/i386/boot/ but _this_
zImage is a binary only of 25xx bytes!
There's one vmlinux at /usr/src/././arch/i386/boot/compressed/ in
0.6MB size - quite contrary to th
17 matches
Mail list logo
