On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:37:37AM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> 2.2.17 is recommended to fix a set of root-level exploits (local,
> IIRC) in the 2.2.9 (?) - 2.2.16 series. Prior to 2.2.9, there were,
> IIRC, some memory issues or other random bugs. I'm running 2.2.17 at
> home and 2.2.
>> >>The system is an up-to-date potato
>> >>Linux cruncher 2.2.15 #1 Thu Jun 1 10:47:16 EST 2000 i686 unknown
>> >
>> >Its not up-to-date if its not running the latest kernel in the range
>> >2.2.17 at the moment :)
>>
>2.2.17 is recommended to fix a set of root-level exploits (local,
>IIRC) in th
on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Robert Waldner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:44:21 +1300, "C. Falconer" writes:
<...>
> >At 06:39 AM 10/25/00 +0200, you wrote:
> >>The system is an up-to-date potato
> >>Linux cruncher 2.2.15 #1 Thu Jun 1 10:47:16 EST 2000 i686 unk
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:44:21 +1300, "C. Falconer" writes:
>At 06:39 AM 10/25/00 +0200, you wrote:
>>As long as I had 128 megs there were ~ 3 megs free with some 60 megs
>>used for buffers. Now I have 320 megs ram, but only about 150 are used
>>for buffers, 100 are free.
>
>Thats a helluva lot of r
At 06:39 AM 10/25/00 +0200, you wrote:
As long as I had 128 megs there were ~ 3 megs free with some 60 megs
used for buffers. Now I have 320 megs ram, but only about 150 are used
for buffers, 100 are free.
totalusedfree shared buffers cached
Mem:321784 224244 9
Hi!
I´m trying to get my workstation running as fast as possible, and since
I´ve got hold of some extra ram ...
Please correct me if I´m wrong:
Linux uses most of the free ram for caching (read+write), up to a
certain percentage which is kept free for general purposes. afaik this
is one of t
6 matches
Mail list logo
