On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 02:16:40PM -0500, kjohn...@eclypse.org wrote:
> I would like to see fixed bugs for the mailman3 package, and related packages.
Start by going to the package's bug page:
<http://bugs.debian.org/mailman3>
At the bottom of the page, there's a form
How do I see fixed bugs for a package at bugs.debian.org? I can find open bugs
from https://www.debian.org/Bugs/, but maybe something that has been fixed
would give me insight.
I would like to see fixed bugs for the mailman3 package, and related packages.
I am trying to migrate from mailman2
On 8/14/21, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> On 8/14/21, Brian Thompson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'm getting a 500 error when trying to access the apt-listchanges, apt,
>> and apt-listd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2021-08-14 at 22:42 -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> Would Developers *very recently* flipping the release switch for
> buster/bullseye/bookworm affect that?
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2021/08/msg1.html
>
> Maybe
On 8/14/21, Brian Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm getting a 500 error when trying to access the apt-listchanges, apt,
> and apt-listdifferences pkgreports on bugs.debian.org. It looks like
> there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello everyone,
I'm getting a 500 error when trying to access the apt-listchanges, apt,
and apt-listdifferences pkgreports on bugs.debian.org. It looks like
there is a problem with all of the pkgreports.
Here is one of the URLs:
Hello,
Will trying to install OpenQA on Debian, I discovered a bugs opened on
bugs.debian.org.
I tried to make the driver, it's seem to work but i've been stuck, how i
can help DD on this paquages, it's been 5 years old now.
Thanks
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, charset: utf-8, 60 lines --]
> On 2020-07-27 13:49, Sven Hartge wrote:
>>
>> Does your MTA present a client certificate? Maybe buxtehude does not
>> like that?
>>
> Yes, it has a certificate. Whether buxtehude likes it I cannot say,
> but i
On 2020-07-27 13:49, Sven Hartge wrote:
Does your MTA present a client certificate? Maybe buxtehude does not
like that?
Yes, it has a certificate. Whether buxtehude likes it I cannot say,
but it looks OK to me. Its a wildcard certificate, though:
Certificate:
Data:
Version: 3 (0
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 2020-07-27 11:17, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Debian uses their own CA to sign this certificate, which is fine for
>> SMTP, which normally only uses opportunistic encryption.
>>
>> But if the client SMTP-Server is set to *verify* the certificate, it
>> will fail.
> Certific
On 2020-07-27 11:17, Sven Hartge wrote:
Debian uses their own CA to sign this certificate, which is fine for
SMTP, which normally only uses opportunistic encryption.
But if the client SMTP-Server is set to *verify* the certificate, it
will fail.
Certificate verification is optional on my MTA
Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:43:11AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> I've got a ssl handshake problem with bugs.debian.org on sending an EMail.
>> My mta (OpenBSD 6.7, i.e. libressl) in the office says in its logfile
>>
>> :
>> Jul 27 10:23:39
Hi.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:43:11AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've got a ssl handshake problem with bugs.debian.org on sending an EMail.
> My mta (OpenBSD 6.7, i.e. libressl) in the office says in its logfile
>
> :
> Jul 27 1
Hi folks,
I've got a ssl handshake problem with bugs.debian.org on sending an EMail.
My mta (OpenBSD 6.7, i.e. libressl) in the office says in its logfile
:
Jul 27 10:23:37 gate5a smtpd[67056]: d4df9298d18e1596 mta connecting
address=smtp://209.87.16.39:25 host=buxtehude.debian.org
Jul 27
On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 17:19:42 +0100,
Phil Wyett wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 18:55 +0300, Askar Safin wrote:
- 8< -
>>
>> I am unable listen music using https://vk.com/audio anymore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 18:55 +0300, Askar Safin wrote:
> Recently Debian Stretch introduced the most annoying bug ever: https://bugs.de
> bian.org/900533 ("chromium 67.0.3396.62-1: youtube video, gif's, html5, and
> movies no longer work"). It affects a
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > Where are the state of the sound card(s) saved / restored?
>
> I don't use alsa-utils, but based on my understanding of the FHS, I'd
> expect somewhere under /var/lib/alsa-utils.
>
> But from reading the bug report, I'm led to believe it is
> /var/lib/alsa/asound.stat
Karl E. Jorgensen wrote on 09/11/14 20:04:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 06:12:32PM +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
Pardon me, but I'm a bit frustrated on how to debug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768665
does /var/run get saved across reboots?
I would not expect so.
Hi
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 06:12:32PM +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Pardon me, but I'm a bit frustrated on how to debug
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768665
>
> does /var/run get saved across reboots?
I would not expect so. http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
Pardon me, but I'm a bit frustrated on how to debug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768665
does /var/run get saved across reboots?
Where are the state of the sound card(s) saved / restored?
How can one increase debugging to see whether it is happening or not?
What deter
On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
> To take a step back, I think this is a fair summary of the discussion.
> Please let me know if you disagree:
...
I agree to all points. It is a fair summary.
> I think you've convinced me that the approach of stopping a socket by the
> same name when s
Sorry about the delay in responding.
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> Large time outs can cause bad side-efects on surprising ways. If the
> socket is down, you get an immediate connection refused reply, which
> short-circuits the time out.
> As this is a generic feature, we could be talk
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Is there a reason debian-user is subscribed to this bug report?
Please don't top-post.
Probably because it's a debian-user@ thread that resulted in the the
bug report and we were added to the cc as a (thoughtful) courtesy.
-
Is there a reason debian-user is subscribed to this bug report?
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:42:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
> writes:
[snip]
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people w
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> > Services being subject to a package update can be down for extended
> > amounts of time (think package update that requires manual intervention,
> > or even a full manual reconfiguration, etc), or may actually invol
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> Services being subject to a package update can be down for extended
> amounts of time (think package update that requires manual intervention,
> or even a full manual reconfiguration, etc), or may actually involve an
> ABI break. In both cases, you want that
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
> writes:
> > And bugs #734766 and #734848 tell one the answer, which is that in order
> > to preserve its existing conceptual model that there is just the one
> > thing (named simply "acpid") invoke-rc.d should pull out the "soc
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
writes:
> And bugs #734766 and #734848 tell one the answer, which is that in order
> to preserve its existing conceptual model that there is just the one
> thing (named simply "acpid") invoke-rc.d should pull out the "socket"
> from the "service" by looking for a "Trigge
ZH> $ sudo systemctl stop acpid
ZH> Job for acpid.service canceled.
... because, as noted, it's a socket-activated service, which actually
makes it two separately startable and stoppable things
("acpid.service" and "acpid.socket") in the world of systemd, only one
of which is being stopped when yo
Bug #736258 reopened, set to severity grave, and reassigned to systemd for
further processing and action.
Full explanation added to the bug report and CC'd to the bug report and to
the systemd maintainers.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and i
el
[1]
http://sources.debian.net/src/sysvinit/2.88dsf-53.2/debian/service/service#L191
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751741
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Interrelated problem A:
> $ ps aux|egrep -i acpid
> root 318 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S< 12:40 0:00 [ktpacpid]
> root 19855 0.0 0.0 4372 972 ?Ss 17:45 0:00
> /usr/sbin/acpid
> $ sudo systemctl stop acpid
> Job for
script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/acpid_1%3a2.0.22-3_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Possibly the bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736258
Been happening the past week or so (
deleted
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.503)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package bootlogd dpkg
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'bootlogd',
'dpkg'
Limit currently set to 'package':'bootlogd
On Du, 15 ian 12, 14:35:17, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
> debian-user's topic is user support.
>
> For technical discussions about development, the default group is
> debian-de...@lists.debian.org.
> Reference:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/Reporting.wml?r1=1.18&r2=
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
The ITS requires a package to be specified to send a report. If the
reporter doesn't know which package is concerned, our documentation
about bug reporting says:
If you are unable to determine which package your bug report should be
filed ag
On Tue 08 Nov 2011 at 22:48:28 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I can only say "Wow!"
But you said it so charmingly. :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.or
On Ma, 08 nov 11, 19:13:03, Brian wrote:
>
> Instead of penalising many 1000s of legitimate users the network
> administrators could remove the connectivity of the offenders. Why don't
> they? My own ISP conducts regular sweeps for open relays and has an
> abuse department which takes rigorous act
On Tue 08 Nov 2011 at 10:57:27 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Good information. Thanks for sharing it.
>
> A possible downside to that setting is that your host will try to
> connect directly to the reportbug.debian.org host on smtp port 25. By
> itself that is fine. But many networks today block
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 10 oct 11, 18:38:33, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > 3. Reportbug sends the bug report bug using /usr/sbin/sendmail as the
> >MTA. If that doesn't work then reportbug (and other commands too)
> >will have problems. I have no workaround to /usr/sbin/sendmail not
> >
On Lu, 10 oct 11, 18:38:33, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> 3. Reportbug sends the bug report bug using /usr/sbin/sendmail as the
>MTA. If that doesn't work then reportbug (and other commands too)
>will have problems. I have no workaround to /usr/sbin/sendmail not
>working. That simply must w
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:21:30 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
I will try to be very brief to avoid getting you extenuated ;-)
> Camaleón wrote:
(about Flash Player support in ARM platform...)
>> (although it seems that ARM already supports Flash Player¹)
>
> I did not know that ARM now had closed sour
e an email.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Sending the bug report via e-mail
You can report bugs in Debian by sending an e-mail to
sub...@bugs.debian.org with a special format described
below. reportbug (see above) will properly format the e-mails for you;
please
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:07:04 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > Camaleón wrote:
>> >> Besides, I'm sure you know that flash player plugin can contact you
>> >> webcam and audio devices very easily.
>> >
>> > Is that true on an ARM based platform? Remember that D
Camaleón wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Camaleón wrote:
> >> Besides, I'm sure you know that flash player plugin can contact you
> >> webcam and audio devices very easily.
> >
> > Is that true on an ARM based platform? Remember that Debian supports a
> > large number of architectures. AFAIK ther
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:37:17 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:57:50 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:15:46 + (UTC) Camaleón
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:50:10 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> >>
> >> > Camaleón wrote:
> >> >> Darac Marjal wrot
monstrates the needing of alternatives to the usual reportbug
>> system.
>
> We should be clear that the referenced bug report proposes being able to
> submit *email* to bugs.debian.org via http. As an alternative transport
> system it may have advantages for some people in some cirums
r that the referenced bug report proposes being able to
submit *email* to bugs.debian.org via http. As an alternative transport
system it may have advantages for some people in some cirumstances, port
25 being blocked, for example. So that could be regarded as a good option
but it does not involve an
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:26:09 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > (shock, surprise) You are saying that filling out a web form in a
>> > browser can run processes on the local host machine and send data to
>> > the internet? No it can't or it would be a severe secu
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:58:27 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 16:37:17 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> And I see there is a bug report for having an http alternative:
>>
>> support for submitting bug reports via http
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Camaleón wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > (shock, surprise) You are saying that filling out a web form in a
> > browser can run processes on the local host machine and send data to the
> > internet? No it can't or it would be a severe security vulnerability.
> > Please list any browser that allows
On Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 16:37:17 +, Camaleón wrote:
> And I see there is a bug report for having an http alternative:
>
> support for submitting bug reports via http
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590214
A quote from that link (which Stefano Zacchiroli went o
On Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 17:50:10 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > And bugzilla does not tend to crash when writing bug reports >:-)
> >
> > In fact, I usually avoid using "reportbug" because of its high
> > instability (it's annoying having to re-do a full report several
> > times
their
frustation :-)
I can assure you the last thing I like is criticizing a program but when
something crashes many times in front of your face and you have been
recollecting detailed information to write a good bug report... well, is
not a very nice experience.
And I see there is a bug re
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:15:46 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:50:10 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Camaleón wrote:
> >> Darac Marjal wrote:
...
> >> And bugzilla does not tend to crash when writing bug reports >:-)
> >>
> >> In fact, I usually avoid using "reportbug" becaus
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> 3. Reportbug sends the bug report bug using /usr/sbin/sendmail as the
> MTA. If that doesn't work then reportbug (and other commands too)
> will have problems. I have no workaround to /usr/sbin/sendmail not
> working. That simply must
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:50:10 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Darac Marjal wrote:
>> > While a web-based interface may be nice, I think that where debian's
>> > bug reporting excels is in the 'reportbug' program. It's not just a
>> > program that sends emails to a single address, but
Disc Magnet wrote:
> It usually hangs whenever I launch reportbug and click on some other
> window (thus report bug becoming the inactive window). When I click on
> reportbug again, it is found to be in hung state. It doesn't respond
> at all.
I think you are using reportbug-ng, not reportbug. I
a
sub-process or not.
Try a simpler editor. I am using emacs proving that complex
editors work fine. But if you are using some graphical editor then
I could see a bug there appearing as a reportbug hang but really
being an editor problem.
reportbug --editor=nano
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Darac Marjal wrote:
>> > While a web-based interface may be nice, I think that where debian's bug
>> > reporting excels is in the 'reportbug' program. It's not just a program
>> > that sends emails to a single address, but it
Camaleón wrote:
> Darac Marjal wrote:
> > While a web-based interface may be nice, I think that where debian's bug
> > reporting excels is in the 'reportbug' program. It's not just a program
> > that sends emails to a single address, but it provides a good guide
> > through the bug-reporting proces
On Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 11:42:50 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:04:07AM +, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to see a web based interface for reporting bugs in Debian, while
> > I find reporting by e-mail a very nice (must have) option, bugzilla-alike
> > based interfa
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:42:50 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:04:07AM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I'd like to see a web based interface for reporting bugs in Debian,
>> while I find reporting by e-mail a very nice (must have) option,
>> bugzilla-alike based interfaces
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:04:07AM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:01:11 +0200, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > Is there any issue known with reportbug in unstable/bugs.debian.org?
> > Somehow I don't receive an response with a bug number when submitting a
> &
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:01:11 +0200, Frank Lanitz wrote:
> Is there any issue known with reportbug in unstable/bugs.debian.org?
> Somehow I don't receive an response with a bug number when submitting a
> bugreport
If you receive no bug number it could be because the report was
Hi folks,
Is there any issue known with reportbug in unstable/bugs.debian.org?
Somehow I don't receive an response with a bug number when submitting a
bugreport
Cheers,
Frank
--
http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpXhHPgXEGnc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 18 May 2011 06:17:07 -0700, Regid Ichira wrote:
> Is there a way to see whether a random bug report in the BTS has
> usertags?
AFAIK, tags are usually displayed in the bug report.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Is there a way to see whether a random bug report in the BTS has usertags?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/103555.65632...@web120718.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Querying Debian BTS for reports on glibc
^^^^
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=glibc
No bugs there.
> (source)... No bug reports found.
>
> But there are bugs in the BTS:
>
> http://bugs
ugs in the BTS:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=nscd
reportbug against other packages did find bug reports on the BTS.
Thanks for any help
Hermann
--
Netzwerkadministration/Zentrale Dienste, Interdiziplinaeres
Zentrum fuer wissenschaftliches Rechnen der Universitaet Heid
eport accepted
Thank you for reporting that this bug log contains spam. These reports
are reviewed regularly and used to clean the bug logs and train the spam
filters."
See also #498257 (http://bugs.debian.org/498257)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't u
Hi!
Just noticed that bug #299930 contains a single SPAM message among
several "normal" ones.
When I follow the "this bug log contains spam" link, it asks for
confirmation: "Yes, report bug 299930 as spam".
What will happen if I confirm? Will the whole bug report be marked as
SPAM (as the word
Ink Bottle wrote:
> I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated,
> or not treated.
It was determined that the bug was not in midori but in swfdec or libwebkit. So
the bug was reassigned to swfdec. It turns out the bug was actually in libwebkit
(as you noted in your last comment on the b
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 17:16:20 -0800, Ink Bottle (ink.bot...@yahoo.com)
wrote:
> I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated,
> or not treated.
It looks like your bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515159 was forwarded by
one of the package mai
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Ink Bottle wrote:
> From: Ink Bottle
> Subject: 515...@bugs.debian.org
> To: "deb"
> Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 1:16 AM
> I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated,
> or not treated.
>
> regards
> -- Ink
I quite don't understand how this bug had been treated,
or not treated.
regards
-- Ink Bottle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-11-10 22:19 +0100, T o n g wrote:
Hi,
is it only me or bugs.debian.org is really down?
It is, it had been announced shortly before the outage:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2008/11/msg1.html.
Oh. Okay. :/
M. Allums
--
To
I have the same problem. I figured it was me, so it is nice to know it
isn't. Me.
Mark Allums
T o n g wrote:
Hi,
is it only me or bugs.debian.org is really down?
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL: http://bugs.debian.org/
The following erro
On 2008-11-10 22:19 +0100, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it only me or bugs.debian.org is really down?
It is, it had been announced shortly before the outage:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2008/11/msg1.html.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
François Cerbelle wrote:
> T o n g a écrit :
>> Hi, is it only me or bugs.debian.org is really down?
>
> I first thought that my "reportbug" was broken, I went to the site and
> it did not work, neither, so...
>
> ...You're right ! ;-) There
T o n g a écrit :
Hi,
is it only me or bugs.debian.org is really down?
I first thought that my "reportbug" was broken, I went to the site and
it did not work, neither, so...
...You're right ! ;-) There is a bug, you should fill a bug report !!! ;-)
Fanfan
--
To UNSUBS
Hi,
is it only me or bugs.debian.org is really down?
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL: http://bugs.debian.org/
The following error was encountered:
* Connection to 140.211.166.43 Failed
The system returned:
(110) Connection timed out
The
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-01-30 14:58 +0100, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > I'm wondering what to do when an update to a Debian bug report is not
> > showing up on bugs.debian.org and not getting relayed to the bug
> > subscribers.
On 2008-01-30 14:58 +0100, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> I'm wondering what to do when an update to a Debian bug report is not
> showing up on bugs.debian.org and not getting relayed to the bug
> subscribers. How do I file a bug report about BTS?
With reportbug, as you would do for any
(please cc me in replies)
Hello,
I'm wondering what to do when an update to a Debian bug report is not
showing up on bugs.debian.org and not getting relayed to the bug
subscribers. How do I file a bug report about BTS?
The bug in question is #399480 and I updated the patches to the
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> since a while I received a lot of unsolicited email from bugs.debian.org :
> how can we avoid such sending ?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jerome
>
>
Are you subscribed to other debian lists? Many bugs (depending
on seve
Hello List,
since a while I received a lot of unsolicited email from bugs.debian.org :
how can we avoid such sending ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our virus checker has found potentially malicious code in a mail from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) addressed to you. Delivery has been
stopped. For further
questions, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message has been quarantined as 4048f1a7-7a53.
CLAM Anti Virus found:
W
Hello everybody,
bad News: bugs.debian.org seems to be down.
or is this just my f***ing ISP?
I wanted to look for 3 Packages if there are open bugs:
xemacs (sid) starts very, very, very, very slowly
gsfonts-x11 causes some programs to segfault:
xfontsel, sditres, xvncviewer (this one
Bernhard Josef Rieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>bad News: bugs.debian.org seems to be down.
Yes, master.d.o had some serious(ly weird) kernel/disk problems
yesterday afternoon, and wouldn't come back up when the admins tried to
reboot it. It's being worked on
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:36:37PM +0200, Bernhard Josef Rieder uttered:
> Hello everybody,
>
> bad News: bugs.debian.org seems to be down.
> or is this just my f***ing ISP?
>
No, master.debian.org, which hosts the BTS is currently down. The story I
got is that it bl
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At Jonhie's suggestion I have added a rewriting rule for bugs.debian.org,
> > the following URLs now act as expected:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/ --> To main
At Jonhie's suggestion I have added a rewriting rule for bugs.debian.org,
the following URLs now act as expected:
http://bugs.debian.org/ --> To main bugs page
http://bugs.debian.org/apt --> To the bug pages for APT
http://bugs.debian.org/ -> To the bug pages for any package
li
The virtual domains bugs.debian.org and lists.debian.org are broken.
Hopefully they will be up later today.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
94 matches
Mail list logo
