On Vi, 28 ian 22, 17:44:59, Joseph Brenner wrote:
> > Careful, unlink in the *nix world typically means delete (a file), while
> you probably meant unmount / mount.
>
> Yes, precisely.
>
>
> > In general there shouldn't be a problem for newer kernels to read older
> versions of a particular file
> Careful, unlink in the *nix world typically means delete (a file), while
you probably meant unmount / mount.
Yes, precisely.
> In general there shouldn't be a problem for newer kernels to read older
versions of a particular file system[1], but the other way around can be
a problem.
That's int
On Mi, 26 ian 22, 17:33:04, Joseph Brenner wrote:
> I was wondering if the on-disk data format for btrfs is
> compatible between the i386 and amd64 code bases--
> e.g. would you expect to be able to swap data drives
> between machines running either?
In general yes.
> I've got an old i386 instal
I was wondering if the on-disk data format for btrfs is
compatible between the i386 and amd64 code bases--
e.g. would you expect to be able to swap data drives
between machines running either?
I've got an old i386 installation with /home in it's
own partition, and I'm wondering if I can expect to
4 matches
Mail list logo
