Re: bounce-debian-user log entry

2002-05-04 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:18:53AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote: > But it's nevertheless strange that logcheck decided to flag it as a > "possible security violation". Possibly frightened by the the BAD in the > msgid string? Yes, logcheck is known for doing stuff like that. If you get mail from som

Re: bounce-debian-user log entry

2002-05-04 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Carlos Sousa wrote: > But it's nevertheless strange that logcheck decided to flag it as a > "possible security violation". Possibly frightened by the the BAD in the > msgid string? Not knowing how logcheck works, my guess is logcheck just didn't know what it was, I doubt the s

Re: bounce-debian-user log entry

2002-05-04 Thread Carlos Sousa
On Sat, 4 May 2002 16:08:01 -0700 (PDT) "Paul 'Baloo' Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2002, Carlos Sousa wrote: > > >May 4 14:54:15 snob sm-mta[1790]: g44DsFJX001790: > >from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >size=8878, class=-30, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >

Re: bounce-debian-user log entry

2002-05-04 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Carlos Sousa wrote: >May 4 14:54:15 snob sm-mta[1790]: g44DsFJX001790: >from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >size=8878, class=-30, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=snob [127.0.0.1] > > What does this mean? I've never had trouble with t

bounce-debian-user log entry

2002-05-04 Thread Carlos Sousa
I've just found this "possible security violation" (logcheck) in my logs: May 4 14:54:15 snob sm-mta[1790]: g44DsFJX001790: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=8878, class=-30, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=snob [127.0.0.1] What does this mean? I've n