On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:22:45 -0400 Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I assume that your quest continues? :-}
Yea, nothing firm yet. Having some difficulties with configuring it. I'll
try more this weekend, got caught up in a few projects for work.
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNS
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:42:27PM -0500, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:42:29 -0400 Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So who's the brave soul who's managed to run another OS on plex86? How
> > easy has it been?
>
> I'll be finding out in the next few days, possibly t
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:42:29 -0400 Andy Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So who's the brave soul who's managed to run another OS on plex86? How
> easy has it been?
I'll be finding out in the next few days, possibly tonight.
--
Jamin W. Collins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:27:34AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I stand corrected.
>
> Citations help. From the Plex86 information page:
>
> http://www.plex86.org/info.phtml
>
> What is Plex86?
>
> The goal of the Plex86 p
on Wed, Sep 25, 2002, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:10:51AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Wed, Sep 25, 2002, Leandro Guimar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Em Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:23 +0100,
> > > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > > > Bo
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:10:51AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Wed, Sep 25, 2002, Leandro Guimar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Em Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:23 +0100,
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > > Bochs emulates individual machine instructions in software. VMware lets
>
on Wed, Sep 25, 2002, Leandro Guimar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Em Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:23 +0100,
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:29:57PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:21:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
Em Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:23 +0100,
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:29:57PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:21:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> > > > some may even require
Vmware let's you run an operating system compiled
for i386 (intel) on i386. It only simulates an interface
to the hardware. So that you can run windows for i386 on
linux for i386. While bochs actually emulates the i386 so
that you can run windows for i386 on something like a
sun sparc.
Bijan
-
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 12:29:57PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:21:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> > > some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
> >
> > Is bochs anywhere near as user-friendly as v
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:21:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> > some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
>
> Is bochs anywhere near as user-friendly as vmware yet?
Nope, not by a long shot. Also, vmware is also lightening f
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:07:27PM -0700, nate wrote:
> some may even require use of vmware/bochs/etc to run ..
Is bochs anywhere near as user-friendly as vmware yet?
--
Baloo
msg02812/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
