/obpm
That page had been mentioned in another group.
Omron Blood Pressure Manager
The current version supports the following features:
Omron HEM-7322U (M500 IT, M6 Comfort IT) and HEM-7131U (M400 IT, M3
IT)
I haven't been able to determine which current model(s) match the
spec
On 08/30/2017 02:33 PM, Wilko Fokken wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:44:07AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
For sometime I've been causally looking for a blood pressure cuff with
communication capability that does NOT require a "smart" phone [be
it Apple or Android].
A recen
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:44:07AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> For sometime I've been causally looking for a blood pressure cuff with
> communication capability that does NOT require a "smart" phone [be
> it Apple or Android].
>
> A recent hospital stay prompts me
nted absolutely anything remotely related to experimentation?
What's the purpose of creating a database of readings then?
This obsession with readings becomes a health problem in itself. No reading
ever
can say what your blood pressure was 5' before or after. Maybe twice a day when
you ar
ood to check both on the same screen(s).
>
> https://github.com/LazyT/obpm
>
> Omron Blood Pressure Manager
>
> The current version supports the following features:
>
>Omron HEM-7322U (M500 IT, M6 Comfort IT) and HEM-7131U (M400 IT, M3
>IT)
> ...
>
&g
On 2017-08-29, Terence wrote:
>
> Thanks, it is, Curt, and I hope yours is, and stays, good!
>
> I would be grateful for the link, though- I use Garmin Connect for my Fenix
> watch, and it would be good to check both on the same screen(s).
https://github.com/LazyT/obpm
Omron
!
Terence
On 29 August 2017 at 17:34, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-08-29, Terence wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Curt,
>
> Hi.
>
> > I have used an Omron Evolv upper arm blood pressure monitor since my
> triple
> > bye-pass earlier this year.
>
> Hope it wasn't b
On 2017-08-29, Terence wrote:
>
> Hi, Curt,
Hi.
> I have used an Omron Evolv upper arm blood pressure monitor since my triple
> bye-pass earlier this year.
Hope it wasn't bye-bye pass surgery.
;-) (sorry).
> FWIW I have found the Omron Connect application and my
Hi, Curt,
I have used an Omron Evolv upper arm blood pressure monitor since my triple
bye-pass earlier this year.
FWIW I have found the Omron Connect application and my Samsung Galaxy Note
sufficient for my needs and when talking/showing to medical staff.
I don't think anyone produces wha
On 2017-08-29, Richard Owlett wrote:
> For sometime I've been causally looking for a blood pressure cuff with
> communication capability that does NOT require a "smart" phone [be
> it Apple or Android].
>
> A recent hospital stay prompts me to more actively look.
>
On 08/29/2017 08:26 AM, Fungi4All wrote:
From: rowl...@cloud85.net
To: debian-user
For sometime I"ve been causally looking for a blood pressure cuff with
communication capability that does NOT require a "smart" phone [be
it Apple or Android].
A recent hospital stay prompts me t
> From: rowl...@cloud85.net
> To: debian-user
>
> For sometime I"ve been causally looking for a blood pressure cuff with
> communication capability that does NOT require a "smart" phone [be
> it Apple or Android].
>
> A recent hospital stay prompts me to mor
For sometime I've been causally looking for a blood pressure cuff with
communication capability that does NOT require a "smart" phone [be
it Apple or Android].
A recent hospital stay prompts me to more actively look.
I currently have a wrist cuff type with memory but no communica
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 01:41 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> However, on the web page at
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Multibooting , under the heading
> "4.8 - Multibooting OpenBSD/i386"
> is
> "Only one of the four primary MBR partitions can be used for booting
> OpenBSD (i.e., extended pa
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>>
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 0
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tou
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:01:39AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> > So, if BSD
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>>
FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
>
On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
system, I found it to be a pain (especially the upgrade), as did many
ot
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>> FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
>> system, I found it to be a pain (especially the upgrade), as did many
>> others. There has recently been so
Well, the thing about FBSD is that it's users are pretty much all
hobbyists, so the length of a manual is a good thing. If Debian had
documentation of equal or greater length I can only see that as a
strength, not a weakness.
If you count folks like Yahoo as hobbyists.
Last time I looked, the
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
> system, I found it to be a pain (especially the upgrade), as did many
> others. There has recently been some chatter on their general mailing
> list to overhaul how the
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:12:35PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
It is also availabl
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:12:35PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
everything, but it does c
* Miles Fidelman [2009-05-01 09:52:58 -0400]:
> As much as I'm a proponent for good manuals, vs. google... you can
> always add "-ubuntu" to your search query
Good point.
--
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Paul Johnson wrote:
Osamu Aoki wrote:
I also feel that google tends to rate *.debian.org sites high so you are
likely to see these more than any random blog posts with good reasons
(especially if you have debian in keywords).
I just wish i could get google to stop giving me useless an
On Fri, 1 May 2009 20:55:09 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:27:03PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Peace.
> > >
> >
> > I wish for it every day, my friend. You have no idea.
>
> Whereas in a previous post …
>
> > I am serious, and I have access to automatic
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:27:03PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>
> > Peace.
> >
>
> I wish for it every day, my friend. You have no idea.
Whereas in a previous post …
> I am serious, and I have access to automatic weapons.
--
Chris.
==
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe
> Actually, since I hadn't even heard of Zim, I did a "zim linux" google
> Images search and it looks like something I should get acquainted with.
>
Great app with a very active developer who is happy to receive bug
reports and feature requests. Zim has literally changed the way I work
and store
* Paul Johnson [2009-04-30 08:41:14 -0700]:
> If I wanted
> Ubuntu answers, 1) I'd be special in the head to start with
Agreed.
--
Cheers,
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I also feel that google tends to rate *.debian.org sites high so you are
> likely to see these more than any random blog posts with good reasons
> (especially if you have debian in keywords).
I just wish i could get google to stop giving me useless answers I can't
use revolvin
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:59:01PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,27.Apr.09, 10:24:39, H.S. wrote:
>
> > Sure there is, but one has to keep the audience in mind. A beginner or a
> > person just starting to find introductory information regarding current
> > linux distros and related applic
On Mon,27.Apr.09, 10:24:39, H.S. wrote:
> Sure there is, but one has to keep the audience in mind. A beginner or a
> person just starting to find introductory information regarding current
> linux distros and related applications and programs is best served by
> google (the search is very fast an
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:18PM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
[..]
> > You must be using one of the M$ Windows clones as your "desktop".
> >
>
> KDE 4.2 at the moment, which is acceptably quick. KDE 3.5.10 on the
> same hardware (2 GB RAM, 2 GHz dual core processor, 7200 RPM sata
> drive) was slugg
oops. I wanted this to go to the list. darn gmail :(
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:13 AM, David Fox wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Miles Fidelman <
>> It's a reference manual, not a getting started book - and like any reference
>> manual it tries to have everything you might possibly need,
2009/4/27 Paul Johnson :
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> Maybe you forgot how great of an OS Win98 was at the time.
>
> It wasn't. It was still a 32-bit multitasking hack sitting on top of
> what amounted to a 16-bit version of an 8-bit single-tasking operating
> system with no cohesive security control
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Maybe you forgot how great of an OS Win98 was at the time.
It wasn't. It was still a 32-bit multitasking hack sitting on top of
what amounted to a 16-bit version of an 8-bit single-tasking operating
system with no cohesive security controls. It was obsolete when it was
stil
> They call it progress. 95% of what I do with my computer is the same as
> what I did on my 486. "Progress" means that I now need a computer a
> thousand times more powerful with five-hundred times more drive space to
> do exactly the same thing.
>
+5 Insightful
> I would be very happy with De
> Especially when the problem is that the computer won't boot, or can't
> get on the internet to run google...
>
Keep a LiveCD handy. It's gotten me at least far enough to Google what
I need at least three times in recent memory.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
-
> On a 650Mhz with 384 MiB RAM laptop, Windows 98 was NOT "flying" by any
> stretch of the imagination.. it was.. hmm.. tolerably sluggish. Unless
> you went crazy & started opening windows by the handful, of course.
>
> If you did, MTBF was about two hours.
>
I have seen it run very well on much
> Honestly, I thought Dotan wrote the above in jest and forget the ":-)".
>
> I certainly did not post in earnest.
>
I meant it. Two years ago I had to maintain a Win98 machine that ran
some library software - nothing else, no internet - on 64 MB RAM on a
433 MHz processor. The thing flew. It woul
In <49f5c5dc.8070...@meetinghouse.net>, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>- for Debian, the documentation page (http://debian.org/doc/), lists a
>reference manual (http://debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/), detailed
>maintainer and developer references, and pointers to general Linux
>manuals for Linux Install
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
>> Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>
>>> There's still something awfully useful and compelling about a serious
>>> reference manual, all in one place, with a comprehensive
>>> table-of-contents, detailed index, and embedded references.
>>>
>>
>> Sure there is, but
H.S. wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
There's still something awfully useful and compelling about a serious
reference manual, all in one place, with a comprehensive
table-of-contents, detailed index, and embedded references.
Sure there is, but one has to keep the audience in mind. A beginn
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:10:13AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
> >Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >>On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >Now a days google is a *huge* help in this.
> >
> There's still something awfully useful and compelling about a serious
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
>> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>>
Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
so
H.S. wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
something new, that's great and the more the merrier.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:57:40AM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> > I'm one to read the 1000 page book cover-to-cover. That way, I'll
> > rememeber a significant amount and know exactly where to look when I
> > need something I don't remember.
>
> Now a days google is a *huge*
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
>> all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
>> something new, that's great and the more the merrier. But if one
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
> all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
> something new, that's great and the more the merrier. But if one
> _must_ go through the docs t
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 01:10:15PM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > Maybe you forgot how great of an OS Win98 was at the time.
>
> This has to be a joke. Win 98 wasn't even an operating system. It was an
> application that ran on top of DOS for pete's sake.
>
> > That was a differ
> > Because MS-bashing on a Debian-centric list does wonder for promoting
> > the usage of FOSS software, right?
>
> I'm not promoting anything.
>
> A bit of anti-M$ trolling is always fun and could get the party going.
>
> :-)
I was a Windows admin for a number of years, that company drove me
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:31:17AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >> I don't know about their more recent consumer-grade offering but
> >> you may want to take a look at Windows '98. When I got the laptop,
> >> it came with a 20-page or so manual. But then considering the
> >> "capabilities" of the OS
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 01:12:03AM EDT, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >>> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> >>> It is also available as a pdf which is >10
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >> I don't know about their more recent consumer-grade offering but you may
> >> want to take a look at Windows '98. When I got the laptop, it came with
> >> a 20-page or so manual. But then considering the "capabilities" of the
> >> OS that was probably overkill anyway.
>
Paul Johnson wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
everything, but it does
>> I don't know about their more recent consumer-grade offering but you may
>> want to take a look at Windows '98. When I got the laptop, it came with
>> a 20-page or so manual. But then considering the "capabilities" of the
>> OS that was probably overkill anyway.
>
> That wrongly assumes anything
>> That sounds more like a problem than a solution. I would not try an OS
>> that had a 1000 page manual. I want simple, not comprehensive.
>
> Then you'd better give up computers. It takes more than 1000 pages to
> properly document any operating system. Try "ls /usr/share/man/* | wc".
>
Docume
In <87zle4497u@thumper.dhh.gt.org>, John Hasler wrote:
>Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> That sounds more like a problem than a solution. I would not try an OS
>> that had a 1000 page manual. I want simple, not comprehensive.
>
>Then you'd better give up computers. It takes more than 1000 pages to
>prope
Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
>> It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
>> everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have other books and
>> articles at http://www.freebsd.
Chris Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
>>> It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
>>> everything, but it does cover a lot.
Steve Kemp wrote at 2009-04-24 09:08 -0500:
> Were my site not already present I'd not start it now - instead I'd
> post to the wiki, or other sites. (The wiki is nice, but it isn't
> a perfect medium because people cannot post questions, leave comments,
> etc. I do think that "forum-like" s
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> That sounds more like a problem than a solution. I would not try an OS
> that had a 1000 page manual. I want simple, not comprehensive.
Then you'd better give up computers. It takes more than 1000 pages to
properly document any operating system. Try "ls /usr/share/man/* | wc
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> > It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
> > everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have other
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Thu,23.Apr.09, 00:13:54, Javier Barroso wrote:
>
>> It would be awesome seeing all the questions asked here (in this list)
>> solved with a pointer to our wiki (this would mean there would be a
>> team which extracts resume from the l
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:12:35PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> > It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
> > everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have othe
On Thu,23.Apr.09, 00:13:54, Javier Barroso wrote:
> It would be awesome seeing all the questions asked here (in this list)
> solved with a pointer to our wiki (this would mean there would be a
> team which extracts resume from the list and put conclusions in the
> wiki, but sure nobody has time fo
> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
> everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have other books and
> articles at http://www.freebsd.org/docs/books.html.
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:27:32PM EDT, Carl Johnson wrote:
> "H.S." writes:
>
> > Michael Pobega wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
> >>> I thought I asked you a question.
> >>>
> >>
> >> There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
> >> r
"H.S." writes:
> Michael Pobega wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
>>> I thought I asked you a question.
>>>
>>
>> There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
>> running your own site, why not contribute to a pre-existing site? I'm
>> person
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:13:54AM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
> www.debian.org/usr/share/doc/ or usr.share.doc.debian.org/ where you
> could find all docs from debian packages. It would be nice (I think)
aptitude install dwww
Now look at http://localhost/dwww
A site providing that to all pack
On Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 08:14:52 -0400, machiner wrote:
> This list is not exclusive to developers. Many people read it. Sure, I'd
> love a
> dev or 2, and I clearly asked, to contribute to the site. Why wouldn't I?
> But, I'd
> be just as happy, and I think the community the site serves woul
> Indeed. The Gentoo documentation is the best that I have ever seen as well.
>
I think that you could leverage this. _Don't_ be a documentation site.
Find some other Debian information to specialize in, such as CLI
humour, comparisons between the "Debian Way" and the
"Ubuntu/Fedora/Gentoo/* Way"
Reply to: hs.sa...@gmail.com
Original Message Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:25:39 -0400
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
Indeed. The Gentoo documentation is the best that I have ever seen as well.
-
On Fri
Reply to: pob...@fuzzydev.org
Original Message Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:08:29 -0400
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
You misunderstand me. Hearing people say that they would rather contribute to
another source, esp one where they may have an
Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
>> I thought I asked you a question.
>>
>
> There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
> running your own site, why not contribute to a pre-existing site? I'm
> personally hoping that one day I
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
>
> I thought I asked you a question.
>
There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
running your own site, why not contribute to a pre-existing site? I'm
personally hoping that one day I can say that Debian's Wiki tr
Reply to: a...@c2i.net
Original Message Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:13:28 +0200
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
I thought I asked you a question.
-
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:13:28 +0200 a...@c2i.net wrote
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:40:11 -0400, machiner wrote in message
<20090422174011.4719e...@lapbox>:
> I'm laughing as I write thisOh my.
..once you're done, Javier Barroso has an excellent proposal. ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
>>
>> > Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older
>> > fellow in particular is going gang-busters! I would
Reply to: a...@c2i.net
Original Message Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:42:04 +0200
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
AYKM?
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.howtoforge.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline
to
> install MythTV on Debian, you could provide him with a link to the
> page of your site that explains how to do just that.
..http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://debiantutorials.org/
might help explain that site's credibility and its need to
seek "input and new blood."
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 04:01:57 H.S. wrote:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > If you are seeking help, it might be worth supplying a URL. The truth of
> > your
>
> Isn't that in the subject line? Or am I missing something here?
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its cor
> debiantutorials.org is 4 years old, the "blog" aspect is new for new Debian
> users to
> write about their experiences.
The site may have been available, but it was unknown until now.
> I'm hearing a lot that the web is already saturated with Debian
> documentation, and
> you may be right.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 20:01, H.S. wrote:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>> If you are seeking help, it might be worth supplying a URL. The truth of
>> your
>
> Isn't that in the subject line? Or am I missing something here?
In gmail in particular, it can be easy to miss the subject line once you
clic
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> If you are seeking help, it might be worth supplying a URL. The truth of
> your
Isn't that in the subject line? Or am I missing something here?
--
Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 08:24:59PM EDT, machiner wrote:
> Reply to: cjns1...@gmail.com
> Original Message Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400
> RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
> Below]
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400 cjns1...@
Reply to: cjns1...@gmail.com
Original Message Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
-
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400 cjns1...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Tue, Apr
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:52:05PM EDT, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
> > > Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older
> > > fellow in particular is going gang-busters!
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
>
> > Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older
> > fellow in particular is going gang-busters! I would like to expand
> > the site to include any of you that can
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 13:58:13 machiner wrote:
> I seek recommendations for improving the site as well as new authors,
> whether one article or many. Please consider it. The site does very well
> in the search engines and it could use some new blood. I would be
> thrilled,
> In a way the OP is spamming the list, but really ...
> Is is etiquette to be so nasty about it?
>
No, it is not etiquette to be nasty. I was helpful and gave him my
suggestions, and further refined ideas with the OP off list. But I do
not want other list members to say "hey, Brian got away with
In a way the OP is spamming the list, but really ...
Is is etiquette to be so nasty about it?
He is clearly a private citizen with a desire to comtribute. That his
attempts fall short of your standards, merely indicates that his request
is justified. I also find a dynamically changing clock a vis
Reply to: andreimpope...@gmail.com
Original Message Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:45:43 +0300
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
Fair enough. Thank you for your reply.
--machiner
-
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:45
On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
> Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older fellow in
> particular
> is going gang-busters! I would like to expand the site to include any of you
> that
> can muster up an hour a week or so to write tutorials or articles germai
> I seek recommendations for improving the site
1) Under the site name there is not one, but _two_ corny taglines. Get
rid of them until you find a single tagline that is witty and on
topic.
2) "Maybe I should have the site translated to Australian"? What is
that? Maybe you should, but I as a vis
for about everyone.
I seek recommendations for improving the site as well as new authors, whether
one
article or many. Please consider it. The site does very well in the search
engines
and it could use some new blood. I would be thrilled, as would the site's
readers,
if one, or a bun
I like very much Blood (Doom clone). Is there a Linux version?
bye
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
98 matches
Mail list logo
