On 2004-07-29, csj penned:
> On 28. July 2004 at 6:13PM -0600, "Monique Y. Mudama"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 2004-07-26, csj penned:
>
> [...]
>
>> > Does this mean the bittorrent upload rate equals the download rate?
>> > This doesn't look good. A look at my ppp stats shows that for th
On 28. July 2004 at 6:13PM -0600,
"Monique Y. Mudama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-07-26, csj penned:
[...]
> > Does this mean the bittorrent upload rate equals the download rate?
> > This doesn't look good. A look at my ppp stats shows that for the
> > 159MB I downloaded this day, I se
On 2004-07-26, csj penned:
> On 26. July 2004 at 12:10AM -0400, Travis Crump
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>
> Knoppix is "popular enough" that there are more than enough speedy
> (for dialup users) ftp and http mirrors to download
Never had that problem, after many gigabtyes downloaded via dialup
the files are available or not available..
> The more you upload, the more other bittorrent clients will let you
> download. Dialup modems can't exactly upload very much, and will slowly
> get pinched off from being able to d
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But what's its disadvantage to the dialup user? The documents
> I've read all indicate that some uploading will be done by the
> bittorrent client. How does the uploading affect the download
> speed? What's the upload to download ratio for dialup users?
The mo
On 26. July 2004 at 12:10AM -0400,
Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > A number of media files I want to download are available
> > > only on bittorrent format. I know about the advantages of
> > > bittorrent for broadband u
On 27. July 2004 at 5:19AM +1000,
bob parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:30, Katipo wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >A number of media files I want to download are available
> > > >only on bittorrent format. I know about the advant
On 2004-07-26, bob parker penned:
>
> Contrast these with jigdo which takes the load of both the server and
> the downloader by downloading only what the downloader does not
> already have available locally. Like wise rsync in very particular
> circumstances.
I know what you're trying to say, but
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:30, Katipo wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>A number of media files I want to download are available only on
> >>bittorrent format. I know about the advantages of bittorrent for
> >>broadband users with underutilized bandwidth. But I'm on
Paul Johnson wrote:
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A number of media files I want to download are available only on
bittorrent format. I know about the advantages of bittorrent for
broadband users with underutilized bandwidth. But I'm on dialup.
My bandwidth gets saturated with a simple "wget
Paul Johnson wrote:
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A number of media files I want to download are available only on
bittorrent format. I know about the advantages of bittorrent for
broadband users with underutilized bandwidth. But I'm on dialup.
My bandwidth gets saturated with a simple "wget -
csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A number of media files I want to download are available only on
> bittorrent format. I know about the advantages of bittorrent for
> broadband users with underutilized bandwidth. But I'm on dialup.
> My bandwidth gets saturated with a simple "wget -c linux.iso"
A number of media files I want to download are available only on
bittorrent format. I know about the advantages of bittorrent for
broadband users with underutilized bandwidth. But I'm on dialup.
My bandwidth gets saturated with a simple "wget -c linux.iso" (a
52K modem that feels more like 45K).
13 matches
Mail list logo
