Ok, after all my badmouthing I finally get it.
The new binutils fully supports 16 bit operations so it has become pickier
when it comes to syntax.
saying movl when you mean movw no longer cuts it because it really will try to
move a long.
I guess this makes sense.
I wish it would have been annou
Ah, there they are, the mythical seg patches.
I just needed to follow the thread into the bug report.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.4-seg-4.patch
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.6-seg-5.patch
Sorry if I've seemed OT here, but anyone who builds the k
Hmm, it appears the the debian testing binutils "works fine"
but all previous kernel versions have invalid assembly code, which binutils
just now decided to start noticing.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2005-04/msg00152.html
It would be funny if I wasn't breaking all my stuff.
3 matches
Mail list logo
