> Now is there any way to convert the other config files apart from
> named.{boot,conf}?
the format of the actual db files didn't change between bind 4/8. all you
need to migrate is the named.boot -> named.conf
adam.
>>Slink has a tool for this purpose ... named-bootconf, it comes as part
>of
>>the bind package.
Now is there any way to convert the other config files apart from
named.{boot,conf}?
TIA
Sven
>Slink has a tool for this purpose ... named-bootconf, it comes as part
of
>the bind package.
Thanks for your support!
Sven
Sven Burgener wrote:
> Is there an easy way for converting old-style BIND (V 4.x.x)
> configuration files to the new version style (V 8.x.x)?
Slink has a tool for this purpose ... named-bootconf, it comes as part of
the bind package.
Fraser
Hi guys!
Is there an easy way for converting old-style BIND (V 4.x.x)
configuration files to the new version style (V 8.x.x)?
I couldn't find anything matching my needs.
TIA
Sven
Paul Miller wrote:
:I think I have bind setup correctly.. how can I test it?
Just add a primary zone, and see wether you can resolve it
correctly. "dig" would be a good too for this.
:Also, how do I add hosts to my domain? For example:
:ftp.3dillusion.com
:mail.3dillusion.com
By adding them to
I think I have bind setup correctly.. how can I test it?
Also, how do I add hosts to my domain? For example:
ftp.3dillusion.com
mail.3dillusion.com
..and finally, is this a safe way to update named (ran monthly):
---
#!/bin/sh
cd /var/named
if [ -f named.root.new ]; then
rm -f named.root.ne
Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 07 Jul 1997 13:23:32 PDT Rob Browning ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > I was trying to set up bind for a small (half class C) subnet, and
> > bind seemed to refuse to do the reverse lookups for the subnet unless
> > I set it up to handle the entire
On 07 Jul 1997 13:23:32 PDT Rob Browning ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I was trying to set up bind for a small (half class C) subnet, and
> bind seemed to refuse to do the reverse lookups for the subnet unless
> I set it up to handle the entire C subnet. Is there some kind of
> masking trick I'm
I was trying to set up bind for a small (half class C) subnet, and
bind seemed to refuse to do the reverse lookups for the subnet unless
I set it up to handle the entire C subnet. Is there some kind of
masking trick I'm not aware of, or is there somewhere I should RTFM?
I didn't see anything in t
10 matches
Mail list logo
