On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:21:37PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> most powerful regex syntax for that? Do you know that the original
> purpose of Perl was log file parsing? If I were you, I'd invest in an
I thought Perl was written to handle Usenet news posts.
--
Chris.
==
Don't forge
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 20:47 -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> I'm trying to find a good log checker.
>
> Basically, I want it to report anything that I don't tell it to ignore.
>
> I've tried logcheck first and when I couldn't get it to do what I want I
> tried logwatch. It has an ignore file
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> I'm trying to find a good log checker.
>
> Basically, I want it to report anything that I don't tell it to ignore.
>
> I've tried logcheck first and when I couldn't get it to do what I want I
> tried logwatch. It has an ignore file that it says to just cut and
> pas
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:15:32PM +, s. keeling wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:55:12AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> > > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > Why doesn't someone make a companion interactive rule maker? Run it in
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:55:12AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > I've tried logcheck first and when I couldn't get it to do what I want I
> > > tried logwatch. It has an ignore file that it says to jus
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:55:12AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm trying to find a good log checker.
> >
> > Basically, I want it to report anything that I don't tell it to ignore.
>
> Well, there's always a shell script that looks for date --yesterd
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:21:37PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:47:20PM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > I do neither perl nor RE: they're both too cryptic. I guess I'll never
> > be a true *N*X weenie.
> >
> So, you want to be able to parse logs and yet
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:47:20PM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> I do neither perl nor RE: they're both too cryptic. I guess I'll never
> be a true *N*X weenie.
>
So, you want to be able to parse logs and yet don't want to learn the
most powerful regex syntax for that? Do you know that
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to find a good log checker.
>
> Basically, I want it to report anything that I don't tell it to ignore.
Well, there's always a shell script that looks for date --yesterday
(nonportable), then grep -v 'string1|string2|...' Don't laugh. It's
I'm trying to find a good log checker.
Basically, I want it to report anything that I don't tell it to ignore.
I've tried logcheck first and when I couldn't get it to do what I want I
tried logwatch. It has an ignore file that it says to just cut and
paste what you want to ignore. I do that and
10 matches
Mail list logo
