On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 22:04:36 +0200
Lucio wrote:
> Are there any ready to use php7.2 packages for Debian Stretch out
> there?
probably there:
https://deb.sury.org/
--
Papst Franziskus ruft zum Kampf gegen Fake News auf. Wir finden, der
Mann, der sich als Stellvertreter Christi ausgibt, von dem e
Il 06/06/2018 20:16, Reco ha scritto:
Debian PHP Maintainers cheated it BTW, enabling tests only for
i386/amd64. Speaks volumes about quality of those tests IMO.
BTW, build failed because mariadb couldn't write to a file in a
subdirectory...
Are there any ready to use php7.2 packages for Deb
Hi.
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 07:15:59PM +0200, Lucio wrote:
> I'm trying to backport php7.2 to Debian stretch.
>
> $ apt-get build-dep php7.2
>
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> [...] default-mysql-server galera-3 mariadb-server-10.1
> mariadb-server-core-10.1 [...]
>
>
I'm trying to backport php7.2 to Debian stretch.
$ apt-get build-dep php7.2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
[...] default-mysql-server galera-3 mariadb-server-10.1
mariadb-server-core-10.1 [...]
Why does BUILDING php7.2 require a mariadb server running?
Hello,
I have few systems with antique Debian versions: early Wheezy and even
Squeeze.
Now, due to the hysteria about the recent wi-fi crack
(https://www.krackattacks.com), patch time comes...
Here is the question: does it seem feasible to backport the current
wpa-supplicant (v. 2.4?) to these o
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:09:56PM +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> > Install the source for the kernel in use and see if the problem still
> appears.
It's still there.
--
Linux amin 2.6.18-4-486 #1 Mon Mar 26 16:39:10 UTC 2007 i586 GNU/Linux
Hans Ekbrand (http://sociologi.cjb.net) <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:37:56PM +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:57:56AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:37:56PM +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:57:56AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > > Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > > >Hi list!
> > > >
> > > >I was trying to backport libcups2
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:57:56AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > >Hi list!
> > >
> > >I was trying to backport libcups2-dev from lenny to etch when I met
> > >with the following error (from config
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:57:56AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> >Hi list!
> >
> >I was trying to backport libcups2-dev from lenny to etch when I met
> >with the following error (from config.log)
> >
>
> >/usr/include/bits/local_lim.h:36:26: error: linux/limits.h: No such f
Hans Ekbrand wrote:
Hi list!
I was trying to backport libcups2-dev from lenny to etch when I met
with the following error (from config.log)
/usr/include/bits/local_lim.h:36:26: error: linux/limits.h: No such file or
directory
How do I get around this?
I did try to build cups again aft
Hi list!
I was trying to backport libcups2-dev from lenny to etch when I met
with the following error (from config.log)
g++ (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
Hi,
I have found a way to re-create the "official" linux-image*.deb
packages using the apt-get source command [1]:
#!/bin/bash
apt-get source -t unstable linux-image-2.6.24-1-686-bigmem
cd linux-2.6-2.6.24
fakeroot debian/rules debian/build debian/stamps
fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen bina
[Discussion on Debian version numbers and backporting]
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Scott wrote:
Perhaps, but it's also confusing to anyone coming to Debian from another
Linux distro. Let's just hope they *properly* update the user agent
string..
I say, that approach is fine, but why no
>> The reason why people backport is generally to avoid having to use
>> *core* libraries from unstable (e.g. libc6), not applications. Simply
>> installing extra applications shouldn't destabilize a Unix system.
Basically backporting is used as a means to avoid using the u
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:06:53PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:26 PM
> Subject: Re: backporting question
>
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: backporting question
> Erm, sometimes, but it depends how complicated the dependencies are.
My
> subversion backport
ch are needed at run-time
and some of which are just needed in order to sort out all the
build-dependencies.
Backporting is really a development/packaging job, I think, which is why
it's not particularly documented for users. It probably can't be - it
can legitimately be a complicated t
Hi,
i have a question regarding backporting. On my desktop i use unstable so i
have never backported an application.
1. Am i correct that you can backport an app (not all of course)
by getting the source from unstable or testing and then
compiling and installing it?
I don't know the
El jueves, 14 de agosto de 2003, a las 18:23, Bob Proulx escribe:
> So if I modify the control file such as to reduce the debhelper
> version dependency then I also modify the version number.
>
> [...]
>
> Really any valid methodology would work. Something like this would be
> fine too. As long
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:24:56PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking at the list archives, I know this has been discussed before.
>
> I am trying to backport some packages from unstable to woody. For some
> of them, I get stuck into something like a "dependencies loop",
>
El sábado, 16 de agosto de 2003, a las 13:47, Travis Crump escribe:
> Wouldn't it be a bug in the package if it build-depended on debhelper 4,
> but didn't actually use any features not available in debhelper 3
I suppose that, of course it would. But filing bugs is free (as in
beer). ;)
Regards,
El domingo, 17 de agosto de 2003, a las 02:45, Rob Weir escribe:
> There's a backport of debhelper 4.1.56 available from here:
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/BACKPORTS stable main
Thanks a lot. I will be trying it soon.
> Make sure you check www.apt-get.org to see if someone else has
Travis Crump wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a bug in the package if it build-depended on debhelper 4,
> but didn't actually use any features not available in debhelper 3[in
> which case it should build-depend on debhelper 3]?[and I have debhelper
> 4.1.52 and dh_shlibs isn't on my system...]
Everythin
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
Mensaje escrito por Bob Proulx el 14/08/2003 1:54:
For my own backports I have been changing the debhelper version
dependency in the debian/control file to specify the woody version. I
have not backported d
gt; Well, indeed many of them. I am trying to backport sound applications
> only available in unstable to make them available for subscribers of
> my sound related mailing list that lack the
> spare-time/interest/bandwidth for upgrading to sid. Specially, I am
> thinking of ardour, one of t
Hi,
Looking at the list archives, I know this has been discussed before.
I am trying to backport some packages from unstable to woody. For some
of them, I get stuck into something like a "dependencies loop",
specially debhelper.
The source for debhelper 4.1.52 can be compiled, but not installe
Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> I am trying to backport some packages from unstable to woody. For some
> of them, I get stuck into something like a "dependencies loop",
> specially debhelper.
For my own backports I have been changing the debhelper version
dependency in the debian/control file
make them available for subscribers of my
sound related mailing list that lack the spare-time/interest/bandwidth
for upgrading to sid. Specially, I am thinking of ardour, one of those
applications whose backporting seems a mess.
For other apps, I also get stuck usually backporting cdbs, but I think
Hi Geoff,
you wrote :
I'm trying to backport the libssl and ipsec-tools packages from
sid to woody, so I can try out the IPsec features of the 2.4.21 kernel.
and your problem is that version of libssl that you need has
shlibdeps on libc6(>= 2.3.1-10).
As far as i know, this dependency i
Hi,
Where would be a good place to ask for help in backporting some
packages? I'm trying to backport the libssl and ipsec-tools packages from
sid to woody, so I can try out the IPsec features of the 2.4.21 kernel.
At the moment, when running '%debian/rules binary' for the o
y how you define things?
If you define stable as all of the shared libraries and you are
required to backport a shared library then you are not running stable
anymore, at least not for that shared library. If you define stable
to be just glibc-2.2.5 then when backporting other libraries you are
Elliot Dray wrote:
1) when you issue the command "apt-get -b build-dep" what exactly does the
build-dep do, does it install dependencies from the branch your trying to
install the package from?
I think you have this command confused with another.
apt-get build-dep packagename
I got that command
Elliot Dray wrote:
> 1) when you issue the command "apt-get -b build-dep" what exactly does the
> build-dep do, does it install dependencies from the branch your trying to
> install the package from?
I think you have this command confused with another.
apt-get build-dep packagename
That comm
Hello,
I've been reading this list for months, over and over again I see that we
(users) are discouraged from running mixed environments, many good reasons
have been given for not running mixed environments. Often the alternative of
backporting the application from testing or unstable has
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:44:28PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
[testing maintenance scripts]
> I believe that they *should* check build-dependencies; otherwise
> building debian from scratch might become impossible...
It would be nice; aj mentioned a while back that it wasn't done for
woody be
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:49:04PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:10:45PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> > > I don't actually know whether the testing scripts check build-depends
> > > or not;
> >
> > The
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:10:45PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> > I don't actually know whether the testing scripts check build-depends
> > or not;
>
> They don't, currently. Even so, gradual upgrades of debconf and
> debhelper in ste
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:10:45PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> "Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > debhelper 4.1.45 (=sid/sarge) builds OK, then resulting .deb then
> > depends on debconf-utils (>= 1.1.1) [source: debconf]
> >
> > debconf 1.2.35 (=sarge) build-depends on debhelp
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:10:45PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> I don't actually know whether the testing scripts check build-depends
> or not;
They don't, currently. Even so, gradual upgrades of debconf and
debhelper in step would have got around such a restriction.
--
Colin Watson
"Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> debhelper 4.1.45 (=sid/sarge) builds OK, then resulting .deb then
> depends on debconf-utils (>= 1.1.1) [source: debconf]
>
> debconf 1.2.35 (=sarge) build-depends on debhelper (>= 4.1.27)
> Which makes me wonder: How did debconf/debhelper get int
I'm in the process of backporting ohpone 1.3.7-2 to woody, but I'm
running into a problem with cyclic dependencies in the debconf area:
oh-phone 1.3.7-2 (=sid) build-depends on libpt-dev (>=1.4.11-3) [source: pwlib]
pwlib 1.4.11-3 (=sid) build-depends on libdv2-dev [source: libd
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 08:52:12PM +0700, +kenobi wrote:
> I have some backported package from sid (compiling from source package)
> on my woody machine.
> 1. How do i know which of my backported package have new version in sid,
> so i may do backporting upgrade?
Try using apt-src.
Hello debian users
I have some backported package from sid (compiling from source package)
on my woody machine.
1. How do i know which of my backported package have new version in sid,
so i may do backporting upgrade?
2. How i can to know what new packages are added to sid that dont
available
Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:27:54PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
I needed a newer version of sane to support my scanner and ended up
backporting the sane packages from unstable to testing
but as its the forst time I have done this sort of thing I just want to
ask - have I
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:27:54PM +, Sean Burlington wrote:
> I needed a newer version of sane to support my scanner and ended up
> backporting the sane packages from unstable to testing
>
> but as its the forst time I have done this sort of thing I just want to
> ask - hav
I needed a newer version of sane to support my scanner and ended up
backporting the sane packages from unstable to testing
but as its the forst time I have done this sort of thing I just want to
ask - have I done this a sensible way ?
I basically followed instructions from
http
47 matches
Mail list logo
