t from the user
# execept as required by dpkg installation scripts.
# $Id: cd_autoup.sh,v 0.5 1998/07/01 21:46:13 bob Exp bob $
#
# derived from Craig Sanders' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> autoup.sh script
# Original Author: Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# and many others.
Now you tell me about the autoup.sh v0.28 upgrade :-)
Yesterday I did some more hunting and found the 2 packages that autoup.sh
v0.27 expected to be in libs - I found them in base. I downloaded them and
autoup'ed again. It installed everything but it still complained about some
conf
I got the same message when I tried to run autoup.sh. However, I was trying
to run it on a hamm system instead of trying to do an upgrade from bo. This
is because I'm a newbie and don't know what I'm doing yet. Nonetheless,
thought I'd let everyone know I saw the error also.
A
v0.28: 1998-07-23 (Craig Sanders)
- libstdc++2.8 has moved from libs/ to base/
- libnet-perl has moved from interpreters/ to base/
as usual, it is available from
http://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ (primary site)
ftp://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/
and
http://taz.net.au/
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, JonesMB wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade from bo to hamm so I can run the new bash and
> try wine.
>
> I run autoup.sh and it ftp'ed the files needed for the upgrade. It
> failed to get me the file libstdc++2.8_*.deb
>
> [...deleted...]
autoup.sh
I am trying to upgrade from bo to hamm so I can run the new bash and try wine.
I run autoup.sh and it ftp'ed the files needed for the upgrade. It failed to
get me the file libstdc++2.8_*.deb
This is what it wrote
250 CWD command successful.
Local directory now /tmp/libs
libstdc++2.8_
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanx for the fast replies.
>
> I'd like to have two emacsen if possible or one that will fit the bill for
> both purposes. The machine I'm working on upgrading is going to be an
> experimental Amateur radio packet machine and is somewhat minimalist. (48
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Young, Ed wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I'm still confused...
>
> Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming.
No, that's not what I meant. IIRC, there was once emacs and now
there are emacs19 and emacs20 and no plain "emacs". If you have a bo
"emacs" package, you
e to try it as long as it will coexist with GNU Emacs.
Any comments or caveats or experiences here?
My priorities:
Emacs (of some variety)
X
AX25Utils.
I also need to be able to compile and do some code development.
Thanx,
Ed
> Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
>
>
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I'm still confused...
>
> Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming.
There are now *four* emacsen in hamm: emacs-19.34, emacs-20.2,
xemacs-19.16, and xemacs-20.4, and you need to choose which you want.
The "emacs" package is obso
ob Nielsen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 9:01 AM
> To: Edward J. Young
> Cc: debian list
> Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I should mention tha
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
>
>
> I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
> packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean
> what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded
> around it and now it needs up
rectify this? By running deselect and upgrading Emacs. I'm loath
> > to try that since emacs is huge and a download would be epic, but if
> > absolutely necessary I will.
> >
> > If it matters, My upgrade went like this:
> > -autoup.sh
> > -dese
Emacs. I'm loath
> to try that since emacs is huge and a download would be epic, but if
> absolutely necessary I will.
>
> If it matters, My upgrade went like this:
> -autoup.sh
> -deselect with ACCESS UPDATE, INSTALL (No SELECT)
> -several more iterations of INSTALL since the fi
matters, My upgrade went like this:
-autoup.sh
-deselect with ACCESS UPDATE, INSTALL (No SELECT)
-several more iterations of INSTALL since the first ones resulted in
brokenly uninstalled packages.
-dselect and running SELECT to get X running (but that's another
posting...)
Now deselect rep
> Craig Sanders' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ftp|http sites at
> debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ often have poor connectivity, at least for
> North American users. The following files are now available at
> www.debian.org/~hilliard:
>
[snip]
Is there any reason you don't just use http://www.debian.or
Craig Sanders' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ftp|http sites at
debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ often have poor connectivity, at least for
North American users. The following files are now available at
www.debian.org/~hilliard:
autoup.sh This differs from the version on Craig
*-Hans Ehrbar ( 3 Jul)
|
| Hello Brian,
|
| thanks for your prompt reply. I have been trying the URL
| you gave me, http://www.debian.org/news#19980624, and I
| checked through the whole directory tree of ftp.debian.org
| but I haven't found autoup.sh anywhere where it is
| accessible pe
*-Hans Ehrbar ( 3 Jul)
|
| Is there an address where I can get autoup.sh and the
| other files necessary for updating by ftp?
|
Check http://www.debian.org/news#19980624 for a list of sites.
Brian
--
Mechanical Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University
Is there an address where I can get autoup.sh and the
other files necessary for updating by ftp?
Hans Ehrbar
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
ems are a result of the way dpkg/dselect
handle installation. The new dpkg interface apt (formerly deity) uses
much more sophisticated ordering algorithms, and eliminates or
minimizes such problems. autoup.sh is intended to perform the
critical upgrades necessary to make it safe to used dpkg
#x27; to 'ln -s' and 'tar cfz' to 'tar chfz' so that the
tarball can be created even if the local debian mirror and the
autoup directory are on different filesystems.
and here's the diff:
---cut here---
--- autoup.sh 1998/04/21 00:10:08 0.25
> I've just released version 0.24 which fixes this (and a few minor problems
> too).
>
> v0.24: 1998-04-21 (Craig Sanders)
> - added libstdc++, libslang0.99.34 (libc5), libslang0.99.38 (libc6),
>netbase, and netstd to the list of packages to install.
> - changed 'unstable' to 'frozen' in var
BTW, i've also made some changes to my http://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup
site.
1. updated autoup.tar.gz to have the latest versions of all the needed
packages.
2. made it accessible as ftp://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup (some people
requested this)
3. made a debfiles/ directory which
On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 07:15:23PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> I did a bo--hamm upgrade over the weekend using your autoup.sh:
>
> $Id: autoup.sh,v 0.23 1998/03/26 15:31:10 root Exp root $
>
> and got this when it got to installing dpkg:
>
>
> dpkg: regarding ..
Henry Hollenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm
> upgrade from 1.3.1.
This is not really appropriate for the developers list, so I have
dropped that list from the address.
From the Debian libc5 to libc6 Mi
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm
> upgrade from 1.3.1.
Where you first used "stable", "contrib" and "non-free", now use
"dists/unstable/main", "dists/unstable/
After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm
upgrade from 1.3.1.
Thanks
Henry Hollenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the
: URL?
http://www.debian.org/devel/autoup.sh
the script works great, btw - I've had no troubles so far (3 vastly
different machines)
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the
> URL?
Look on www.debian.org or http://taz.net.au/autoup/
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USAPGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
Mike,
http://www.debian.org/devel/autoup.sh
Steve Mayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the
> URL?
>
> Micro$oft, what do you want to spend today?
>
> --
> E-mail the word &quo
I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the
URL?
Micro$oft, what do you want to spend today?
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
: Whoa... tried upgrading and I think I got confused. Shouldn't I erase
: my old packages via dselect? Then change my access to ftp and get all the hamm
: packages, then run autoup.sh?
:
:
: Carroll Kong
Pretty much the opposite. Run auto
Whoa... tried upgrading and I think I got confused. Shouldn't I erase
my old packages via dselect? Then change my access to ftp and get all the hamm
packages, then run autoup.sh?
Carroll Kong
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM TH
x27;t know.
it's not needed. most people will probably want it installed, but that's
what dselect is for. the script only installs the bare minimum required,
and leaves everything else to dselect.
autoup.tar.gz is already 7MB in size. libc6-dev would add another ~800K.
> I can
A few thing...
libpthread0 needs to be removed, or libc6 doesn't install
libg++ needs to be removed, or libg++272
Does libc6-dev need to be installed? I'm adding it, but I don't know.
I can have a hacked and working autoup.sh for ftp in about 30 mins if
the machine gets upg
36 matches
Mail list logo