Corrected Cheap*bytes autoup.sh script

1998-08-16 Thread jason and jill
t from the user # execept as required by dpkg installation scripts. # $Id: cd_autoup.sh,v 0.5 1998/07/01 21:46:13 bob Exp bob $ # # derived from Craig Sanders' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> autoup.sh script # Original Author: Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # and many others.

Re: autoup.sh v0.28 released

1998-07-23 Thread JonesMB
Now you tell me about the autoup.sh v0.28 upgrade :-) Yesterday I did some more hunting and found the 2 packages that autoup.sh v0.27 expected to be in libs - I found them in base. I downloaded them and autoup'ed again. It installed everything but it still complained about some conf

Re: autoup.sh fails when upgrading bo -> hamm

1998-07-23 Thread Kent West
I got the same message when I tried to run autoup.sh. However, I was trying to run it on a hamm system instead of trying to do an upgrade from bo. This is because I'm a newbie and don't know what I'm doing yet. Nonetheless, thought I'd let everyone know I saw the error also. A

autoup.sh v0.28 released

1998-07-23 Thread Craig Sanders
v0.28: 1998-07-23 (Craig Sanders) - libstdc++2.8 has moved from libs/ to base/ - libnet-perl has moved from interpreters/ to base/ as usual, it is available from http://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ (primary site) ftp://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ and http://taz.net.au/

Re: autoup.sh fails when upgrading bo -> hamm

1998-07-23 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, JonesMB wrote: > I am trying to upgrade from bo to hamm so I can run the new bash and > try wine. > > I run autoup.sh and it ftp'ed the files needed for the upgrade. It > failed to get me the file libstdc++2.8_*.deb > > [...deleted...] autoup.sh

autoup.sh fails when upgrading bo -> hamm

1998-07-23 Thread JonesMB
I am trying to upgrade from bo to hamm so I can run the new bash and try wine. I run autoup.sh and it ftp'ed the files needed for the upgrade. It failed to get me the file libstdc++2.8_*.deb This is what it wrote 250 CWD command successful. Local directory now /tmp/libs libstdc++2.8_

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Norris Preyer
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanx for the fast replies. > > I'd like to have two emacsen if possible or one that will fit the bill for > both purposes. The machine I'm working on upgrading is going to be an > experimental Amateur radio packet machine and is somewhat minimalist. (48

RE: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Young, Ed wrote: > > > Ok, I'm still confused... > > Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming. No, that's not what I meant. IIRC, there was once emacs and now there are emacs19 and emacs20 and no plain "emacs". If you have a bo "emacs" package, you

RE: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Young, Ed
e to try it as long as it will coexist with GNU Emacs. Any comments or caveats or experiences here? My priorities: Emacs (of some variety) X AX25Utils. I also need to be able to compile and do some code development. Thanx, Ed > Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs > >

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Norris Preyer
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I'm still confused... > > Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming. There are now *four* emacsen in hamm: emacs-19.34, emacs-20.2, xemacs-19.16, and xemacs-20.4, and you need to choose which you want. The "emacs" package is obso

RE: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Young, Ed
ob Nielsen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 9:01 AM > To: Edward J. Young > Cc: debian list > Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs > > On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote: > > > > > > > I should mention tha

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote: > > > I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for > packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean > what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded > around it and now it needs up

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Chea Prince
rectify this? By running deselect and upgrading Emacs. I'm loath > > to try that since emacs is huge and a download would be epic, but if > > absolutely necessary I will. > > > > If it matters, My upgrade went like this: > > -autoup.sh > > -dese

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Edward J. Young
Emacs. I'm loath > to try that since emacs is huge and a download would be epic, but if > absolutely necessary I will. > > If it matters, My upgrade went like this: > -autoup.sh > -deselect with ACCESS UPDATE, INSTALL (No SELECT) > -several more iterations of INSTALL since the fi

autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Edward J. Young
matters, My upgrade went like this: -autoup.sh -deselect with ACCESS UPDATE, INSTALL (No SELECT) -several more iterations of INSTALL since the first ones resulted in brokenly uninstalled packages. -dselect and running SELECT to get X running (but that's another posting...) Now deselect rep

Re: autoup.sh availability

1998-07-05 Thread treacy
> Craig Sanders' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ftp|http sites at > debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ often have poor connectivity, at least for > North American users. The following files are now available at > www.debian.org/~hilliard: > [snip] Is there any reason you don't just use http://www.debian.or

autoup.sh availability

1998-07-05 Thread Bob Hilliard
Craig Sanders' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ftp|http sites at debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ often have poor connectivity, at least for North American users. The following files are now available at www.debian.org/~hilliard: autoup.sh This differs from the version on Craig

Re: autoup.sh by ftp

1998-07-03 Thread servis
*-Hans Ehrbar ( 3 Jul) | | Hello Brian, | | thanks for your prompt reply. I have been trying the URL | you gave me, http://www.debian.org/news#19980624, and I | checked through the whole directory tree of ftp.debian.org | but I haven't found autoup.sh anywhere where it is | accessible pe

Re: autoup.sh by ftp

1998-07-03 Thread servis
*-Hans Ehrbar ( 3 Jul) | | Is there an address where I can get autoup.sh and the | other files necessary for updating by ftp? | Check http://www.debian.org/news#19980624 for a list of sites. Brian -- Mechanical Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] Purdue University

autoup.sh by ftp

1998-07-03 Thread Hans Ehrbar
Is there an address where I can get autoup.sh and the other files necessary for updating by ftp? Hans Ehrbar -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Re: two suggestions re autoup.sh

1998-06-29 Thread Bob Hilliard
ems are a result of the way dpkg/dselect handle installation. The new dpkg interface apt (formerly deity) uses much more sophisticated ordering algorithms, and eliminates or minimizes such problems. autoup.sh is intended to perform the critical upgrades necessary to make it safe to used dpkg

autoup.sh 0.27 released

1998-05-29 Thread Craig Sanders
#x27; to 'ln -s' and 'tar cfz' to 'tar chfz' so that the tarball can be created even if the local debian mirror and the autoup directory are on different filesystems. and here's the diff: ---cut here--- --- autoup.sh 1998/04/21 00:10:08 0.25

Re: autoup.sh v0.25 released

1998-04-21 Thread Craig Sanders
> I've just released version 0.24 which fixes this (and a few minor problems > too). > > v0.24: 1998-04-21 (Craig Sanders) > - added libstdc++, libslang0.99.34 (libc5), libslang0.99.38 (libc6), >netbase, and netstd to the list of packages to install. > - changed 'unstable' to 'frozen' in var

Re: autoup.sh v0.25 released

1998-04-21 Thread Craig Sanders
BTW, i've also made some changes to my http://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup site. 1. updated autoup.tar.gz to have the latest versions of all the needed packages. 2. made it accessible as ftp://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup (some people requested this) 3. made a debfiles/ directory which

autoup.sh v0.24 released (was Re: autoup.sh bug)

1998-04-20 Thread Craig Sanders
On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 07:15:23PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > I did a bo--hamm upgrade over the weekend using your autoup.sh: > > $Id: autoup.sh,v 0.23 1998/03/26 15:31:10 root Exp root $ > > and got this when it got to installing dpkg: > > > dpkg: regarding ..

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-10 Thread Bob Hilliard
Henry Hollenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm > upgrade from 1.3.1. This is not really appropriate for the developers list, so I have dropped that list from the address. From the Debian libc5 to libc6 Mi

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-10 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Henry Hollenberg wrote: > After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm > upgrade from 1.3.1. Where you first used "stable", "contrib" and "non-free", now use "dists/unstable/main", "dists/unstable/

autoup.sh

1998-03-10 Thread Henry Hollenberg
After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm upgrade from 1.3.1. Thanks Henry Hollenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : : I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the : URL? http://www.debian.org/devel/autoup.sh the script works great, btw - I've had no troubles so far (3 vastly different machines) -- Nathan Norman MidcoNet -

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-09 Thread Bob Hilliard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the > URL? Look on www.debian.org or http://taz.net.au/autoup/ -- _ |_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USAPGP Key ID: A8E40EB9

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-09 Thread Steve Mayer
Mike, http://www.debian.org/devel/autoup.sh Steve Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the > URL? > > Micro$oft, what do you want to spend today? > > -- > E-mail the word &quo

autoup.sh

1998-03-09 Thread mike
I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the URL? Micro$oft, what do you want to spend today? -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote: : Whoa... tried upgrading and I think I got confused. Shouldn't I erase : my old packages via dselect? Then change my access to ftp and get all the hamm : packages, then run autoup.sh? : : : Carroll Kong Pretty much the opposite. Run auto

autoup.sh

1998-03-06 Thread Carroll Kong
Whoa... tried upgrading and I think I got confused. Shouldn't I erase my old packages via dselect? Then change my access to ftp and get all the hamm packages, then run autoup.sh? Carroll Kong -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM TH

Re: autoup.sh

1998-01-28 Thread Craig Sanders
x27;t know. it's not needed. most people will probably want it installed, but that's what dselect is for. the script only installs the bare minimum required, and leaves everything else to dselect. autoup.tar.gz is already 7MB in size. libc6-dev would add another ~800K. > I can

autoup.sh

1998-01-28 Thread Tim Sailer
A few thing... libpthread0 needs to be removed, or libc6 doesn't install libg++ needs to be removed, or libg++272 Does libc6-dev need to be installed? I'm adding it, but I don't know. I can have a hacked and working autoup.sh for ftp in about 30 mins if the machine gets upg