On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:31:33 -0400, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote in
message
<4ae059fcfc262fd39f8bd71a9798a9a2.squir...@sax.esid.gecgr.co.cu>:
> Hello
>
> I use Debian Squeeze
>
>
> Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for
> Linux??
..e.g.
On 21/09/11 08:31, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote:
> Hello
>
> I use Debian Squeeze
>
>
> Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for Linux??
>
> At AMD, there is nothing of this.
AMD?
Do you mean ATI?
>
>
> I tried with 2 ATI cards and
Hello
I use Debian Squeeze
Where I can find drivers for ATI Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x TMDS for Linux??
At AMD, there is nothing of this.
I tried with 2 ATI cards and I want to work the TV but I have not done
anything:
1 - R200 BB [Radeon All in Wonder 8500DV]
2 - Rage 128 PF / PRO AGP 4x
Philip Christian wrote:
I still cannot watch DVD movies. I can hear the audio
but I get xvideo errors and a blank screen.
I can watch divx movies fine.
Have other people got DVD playback working with Rage
128 based cards ?
It works for me with ogle, on stock sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Philip Christian wrote:
>I still cannot watch DVD movies. I can hear the audio
>but I get xvideo errors and a blank screen.
>
>I can watch divx movies fine.
>
>Have other people got DVD playback working with Rage
>128 based cards ?
>
>I have tried ogle (crashes) and kaffeine(audio only).
>Both giv
I still cannot watch DVD movies. I can hear the audio
but I get xvideo errors and a blank screen.
I can watch divx movies fine.
Have other people got DVD playback working with Rage
128 based cards ?
I have tried ogle (crashes) and kaffeine(audio only).
Both give the same xvid errors.
Thanks, Ph
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:40:39PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> I recently (last week) figured out how to configure my computer's ATI
> Rage 128 card to work with DRI and use 3D acceleration. I have a
> problem now that if I let xscreensaver launch and start doing
> screen savers,
I recently (last week) figured out how to configure my computer's ATI
Rage 128 card to work with DRI and use 3D acceleration. I have a
problem now that if I let xscreensaver launch and start doing
screen savers, eventually one of the OpenGL screensavers will
completely lock up my screen (I
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 11:20, George App wrote:
> How do you configure opengl support for debian? I am currently running
> sarge and my computer has a ATI rage 128 video card.
I presume by sarge you mean the testing distribution, with XFree86 4.2.
You need to configure XFree86 to load bo
How do you configure opengl support for debian? I am currently running sarge and
my computer has a ATI rage 128 video card.
-- G.A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATY128=y (under character devices ATI
Rage 128) and adding something along the lines of
append="video=aty128fb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to lilo. This will give you a decent
resolution. Otherwise, put vga=ask in your lilo and follow the prompts to
figure out what to replace the "ask" with
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 20:44, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> I'm encountering a few problems with this product - on two different
> machines (with the same kind of video card)
>
> In MODCONF, there's an option for framebuffers. If I choose to install
> the Rage 128 - my screen goes "nuts". If I memori
I'm encountering a few problems with this product - on two different
machines (with the same kind of video card)
In MODCONF, there's an option for framebuffers. If I choose to install
the Rage 128 - my screen goes "nuts". If I memorized the keystrokes, I
can remove the framebuffer module and get
Quoting Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> > Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or
> > > posterior to 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I
> > > can find
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 06:58:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or posterior to
> > 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I can find it even before ?
>
> I tried to have a look in incoming
Quoting Jean-Marc Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now my question : when will a version of XFree equal or posterior to
> 4.2.1-11 hit Sid ? Is there somewhere I can find it even before ?
I tried to have a look in incoming.debian.org but XFree was not there. Is it
reasonnable to install the binar
Running XFree 4.2.1-5 from Sid on an Inspiron 4000 with a Rage 128 M3 onboard.
X won't start. Here is the unusual stuff I have in /var/log/XFree86.0.log :
Symbol drmFreeBufs from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
Symbol drmFreeBufs from module
/usr/X1
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 07:52:55AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> I've had success using this mirror:
>
> deb ftp://ftp.nlc.no/pub/debian/x4.2 sid/$(ARCH)/
I get the same error there; "no such file or directory" for the package
listing.
I think it's not a mirror problem so much as ignorance on
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 00:29, Michael Jinks wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > If you're on the verge of doing 2, it might be better to help test
> > Branden's 4.2 packages. Mirrors are listed here:
> >
> >
> > http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> If you're on the verge of doing 2, it might be better to help test
> Branden's 4.2 packages. Mirrors are listed here:
>
> http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=696&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Trying to do this and running
Quoting Omen Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Jun 26 12:13:
>
[ snip ]
> I just cannot use the DRM 4.1 kernel driver for the Rage
> 128 or X locks up. Now that I think about it, using the kernel 4.1
> driver with X 4.2 seems like it could be a bad idea...
[ snip ]
Hmmm, talking to myself again.
Quoting Michael Jinks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Jun 26 10:42:
>
> > 2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over
> > your Debian install.
I'm jumping in a little late in this discussion, but I just solved this
problem on the Dell Optiplex GX240 with a ATI Technologies
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> I have one of these on my desk at work, it's running Sid/Windows XP. The ATI
> card is a strange Rage 128 Ultra TF, which isn't even listed on ATI's web
> site. I'm guessing that it's an OEM Spesh for Dell.
Figures...
> 1. use th
Colin Watson writes:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
You have two options.
1. use the "vesa" driver and live with extremely shonky video performance.
2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over
your Debian install.
If you're on the
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote:
> You have two options.
>
> 1. use the "vesa" driver and live with extremely shonky video performance.
> 2. Download the binary distribution of XFree86 4.2 and install this over
> your Debian install.
If you're on the verge of doing 2
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Jinks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Helgi ?rn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Carlos Sousa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian User List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: ATI Rage 128 and XFr
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 01:01, Michael Jinks wrote:
OK
I have this in my XF86Config-4 file, on ibm x20
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Generic Video Card"
Driver "ati"
Option "UseFBDev" "true"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
>
> I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different
> laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage
> mobility and x4.1 and -2 with no problems. I also have a stationary, but
> as "
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Helgi ?rn wrote:
> >
> Is this on a laptop too? In Michaels case I think it was a laptop.
FYI no, it's a Dell Optiplex GX240. Mini desktop, video on the
motherboard.
-mrj
--
# Michael Jinks, IB # JFI/MRSEC/EFI Computing # University of Chicago #
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:00:14PM -0500, Steven A. Reisman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:24:59PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote:
> > >
> > > Section "Device"
> > > I
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 22:26, Walter Reed wrote:
OK
Didn't know that Ati Rage Mobility was a mach64 chip, so that's
interesting info.
Anyway, I have it successfully used it at both woody and sid, and the
current installation on the x20 is woody, with a few sid packages :)
/ernst
> On Sat, Jun 22
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:41, Helgi Örn wrote:
>
> Hi
> I don't know if you are running laptop or not, but I have two different
> laptops (an old compac armada and a new ibm thinkpadx20) with ati rage
> mobility and x4.1 and -2 w
"ati" not r128. Mabye you schould try?
/ernst
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 13:47, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > I have a similar problem with my ATI Rage 128 card, there's no way to
> > make it work automatically with the r128 X driver (XFree 4.1.0).
> >
> > I go
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 13:47, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> I have a similar problem with my ATI Rage 128 card, there's no way to
> make it work automatically with the r128 X driver (XFree 4.1.0).
>
> I googled the net and found a suggestion to use a ChipID line. My config
I had to ftp to the Xfree site and download 4.2 for my Rage 128 agp
card. Have not had a problem with it at all. let me know if you want my
config.
Larry
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 12:58, Michael Jinks wrote:
> A group of my users have bought a big batch of Dell desktops with what
> appears to be an A
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:24:59 -0500 Michael Jinks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote:
> >
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier "Ati Rage 128"
> > VideoRam
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
> My usual process for getting acquainted with new hardware is to start by
> installing RedHat, archive /etc, install Debian, and then crib from the
> RedHat /etc for those bits of hardware that Debian doesn't autodetect.
> In the prese
the final "No devices detected."
>
> ?
[snip]
> Fatal server error:
> no screens found
How does the Screen section of the file look like? Is the Device there,
something like this:
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Device
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:41:06PM +0200, Helgi ?rn Helgason wrote:
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Ati Rage 128"
> VideoRam8192
> Driver "r128"
> Option "dpms"
> EndSection
nary box, it took a while to
tweak it in Woody and yes it was hard to believe that it would ever work
with the r128 driver, but in the end I copied some lines from a SuSE 8.0
file. Here's how it looks in my XF86Config-4 file:
---
Section "Device"
Identifier "Ati Ra
A group of my users have bought a big batch of Dell desktops with what
appears to be an ATI chipset soldered to the motherboard for video.
My usual process for getting acquainted with new hardware is to start by
installing RedHat, archive /etc, install Debian, and then crib from the
RedHat /etc
eems happy. You may have to
restart the machine; as I recall there was some compliant about the DRM
module version number after the upgrade and reinstall.
TRS
Graham Williams wrote:
Running Debian unstable up to date installation, Kernel 2.4.18.
Trying to get XFree86 on an ATI Rage 128
Running Debian unstable up to date installation, Kernel 2.4.18.
Trying to get XFree86 on an ATI Rage 128 Ultra Pro II.
Works just fine on a RedHat XFree86 4.1 installation. But can't get it
going with XFree86 4.1 on Debian. Seems that it is not supported under
4.1 but is on 4.2? Not sure w
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 16:18, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:15, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> > PS. Anyone have any clues as to why the disk performance on this box is
> > slow? This manifested itself on 2.2.19, 2.2.20, and 2.4.18. Very boggy
> > at times.
> I find all the debian kernel
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:15, Peter Whysall wrote:
> PS. Anyone have any clues as to why the disk performance on this box is
> slow? This manifested itself on 2.2.19, 2.2.20, and 2.4.18. Very boggy
> at times.
I find all the debian kernel packages slow on my machine. I think this
is because of how
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 07:46, Kent West wrote:
> Peter Whysall wrote:
> >What I /would/ appreciate is any clue on getting the Rage 128 to work
> >with XFree86 4.1 so I can stay Debianized?
> >
> If you're willing to try, I'd recommend copying your working
> XF86Config-4 file to a safe place, then r
Peter Whysall wrote:
"No screens found."
Sigh.
I broke. I sinned.
I downloaded the Linux binary distribution of XFree86 4.2.0, renamed
/etc/X11 and /usr/X11R6 out of the way, ran Xinstall.sh, and it worked
first time, giving me glorious 1280x1024x32bpp loveliness.
What I /would/ apprec
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 14:15, Peter Whysall wrote:
> PS. Anyone have any clues as to why the disk performance on this box is
> slow? This manifested itself on 2.2.19, 2.2.20, and 2.4.18. Very boggy
> at times.
DMA on IDE transfers not switched on?
When the disk is being hammered, is CPU usage goin
I decided to partition my work W2K machine (Dell Optiplex GX240 - 1.7GHz
P4, 256MB, the aforementioned ATI Rage 128 thingy) and install Debian.
Thought, "Hmm, this is a nice modern machine. Should be a doddle."
Ho ho. What a jape I was in for.
Installation went fine, a little da
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 01:21:50PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > Sorry I wasn't clearer. I don't want to give up accelerated video
> > under X which I would have to do if I go the fb route, as I
> > understand it. But maybe I'm missing something.
>
> If you think that using framebuffers for
; > a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
> > > an S3 card to the 128 Pro but can't figure out what settings to use
> > > now. I'd hate to part with the higher resolutions. (I can't find
> > > anything decent in the alternat
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:28:25AM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 04:11:15PM -0600, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> > Has anyone on the list had any luck in configuring svgatextmode with
> > a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
> >
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 04:11:15PM -0600, Curt Daugaard wrote:
> Has anyone on the list had any luck in configuring svgatextmode with
> a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
> an S3 card to the 128 Pro but can't figure out what settings to use
> now.
Has anyone on the list had any luck in configuring svgatextmode with
a video cards in the ATI Rage 128 series? I recently changed from
an S3 card to the 128 Pro but can't figure out what settings to use
now. I'd hate to part with the higher resolutions. (I can't find
anythin
Although this is late, I found the following website was extremely
useful in setting up my ATI Xpert 2000 card (AGP). This card uses an
ATI Rage 128 chip set
http://two.ucdavis.edu/~holland/unix/xpert2000.html
Although I am not a graphics card expert (no pun intended), it appears
that the XF86
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 07:42, Bill Triplett wrote:
> am not an expert, but barring the lack of any other useful advice to
> your question, it looks to me like the Rage 128 Pro TF chipset (from
> lspci) is not listed in the supported chipsets in the logfile. Check the
> XFree86 website and se
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 11:33, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a problem working with my ATI Rage 128 PRO TF card on my
> new DELL machine with a new Installation of Debian Linux and Xfree86-4
>
> Output of lspc :
>
> [ snip ]
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: AT
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Rainer Sigl wrote:
> I have a problem working with my ATI Rage 128 PRO TF card on my
> new DELL machine with a new Installation of Debian Linux and Xfree86-4
Read your own posting! I quote:
> Logfile:
> This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supp
Hi,
I have a problem working with my ATI Rage 128 PRO TF card on my
new DELL machine with a new Installation of Debian Linux and Xfree86-4
Output of lspc :
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge
(rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale
Thus spake Stan Brown:
> I have a machine with an ATI Rage 128 video card. This machine has potato +
> Progeny + 2.4.13 kernel. I have manged to get frambuffer working, but I
> can't figure out how to use anything other than the default resolution/font
> size. I managed to amk
I have a machine with an ATI Rage 128 video card. This machine has potato +
Progeny + 2.4.13 kernel. I have manged to get frambuffer working, but I
can't figure out how to use anything other than the default resolution/font
size. I managed to amke it use a higher denisty font briefly, during
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi all!
> I've been trying to get my ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP (32MB RAM) to
> work with X, but have been unsuccessful. Please, help me...
>
>---> M A R T I N <---
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi
I have a similar card in my laptop and it works fine.
I'm attaching my /etc/XF86Config-4 file
Good Luck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I've been trying to get my ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP (32MB RAM) to
work with X, but have been unsuccessful. Pleas
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:11:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all!
> I've been trying to get my ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP (32MB RAM) to
> work with X, but have been unsuccessful. Please, help me...
Hi, I have an ATI all in wonder rage 128 Pro AGP (32MB) and it is worki
Hi all!
I've been trying to get my ATI Rage 128 Pro 4xAGP (32MB RAM) to
work with X, but have been unsuccessful. Please, help me...
---> M A R T I N <---
Hello Dark Elf,
I have some suggestions that might work. I didn't really see an
unresolved symbol problem myself, but maybe I missed it. I'm running
unstable myself, so your package may be a little differently named
depending on what version of debian you're using. But I would sugg
nfig file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown.
> (==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout"
> (**) |--&g
d, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0)
(**) | |-->Monitor "CM751U"
(**
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:37:22PM -0400, Christopher W. Aiken wrote:
| On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Shivakumar Patil wrote:
|
| | I selected ATI rage 128 Pro generic, chipset as generic, memory as 16 meg
| I have ATI Rage Pro with 4MB ram. I use the mach64 driver, with 1024x768
FYI the Rage Pro and
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Shivakumar Patil wrote:
:)Hi,
:)
:) I am new to debian and installed debian potato 2.2r3 on my 866Mhz, 128
:)MB RAM Dell Machine. I have xserver-svga as my X driver. I used XF86Setup
:)gui tool to create a XF86Config file.
:) I selected ATI rage 128 Pro generic
Hi,
I am new to debian and installed debian potato 2.2r3 on my 866Mhz, 128
MB RAM Dell Machine. I have xserver-svga as my X driver. I used XF86Setup
gui tool to create a XF86Config file.
I selected ATI rage 128 Pro generic, chipset as generic, memory as 16
meg
and monitor as a
SVGA
On Fri, 18 May 2001 18:07:24 Martin WHEELER wrote:
> [Please cc responses direct, as not subscribed to list]
>
> Can any of you good folks help me out with a correctly configured
> XF86Config-4 file, set up for an ATI Rage 128 with 16M of memory,
to
> give an actual window o
[Please cc responses direct, as not subscribed to list]
Can any of you good folks help me out with a correctly configured
XF86Config-4 file, set up for an ATI Rage 128 with 16M of memory, to
give an actual window of 1024x768 on a virtual screen area of 1600x1280?
One that works?
I can&#
> Hi,
> I'm using an ati rage 128 video card with a 2.4.2 kernel and xfree 4.02
> I'd like to know whch packages or drivers I got to install in order to take
> the best of my card, mainly openGL drivers
> thanks in advance
> fred
Hi fred,
Here's the steps t
> Hi,
> I'm using an ati rage 128 video card with a 2.4.2 kernel and xfree 4.02
> I'd like to know whch packages or drivers I got to install in order to take
> the best of my card, mainly openGL drivers
> thanks in advance
> fred
Hi fred,
Here's the steps t
> I'm using an ati rage 128 video card with a 2.4.2 kernel and xfree 4.02
> I'd like to know whch packages or drivers I got to install in order to
take
> the best of my card, mainly openGL drivers
Hi Fred,
this is a part of a german magazine (Linux computing) which i read, ca
Hi,
I'm using an ati rage 128 video card with a 2.4.2 kernel and xfree 4.02
I'd like to know whch packages or drivers I got to install in order to take
the best of my card, mainly openGL drivers
thanks in advance
fred
--
Trace ta route sans compromissions
n the kernel (2.4.0 for me) ie agpgart and your chipset's AGP
support. I compiled that in the kernel (I don't tried compiling as module).
DRM support in the kernel + DRI support for your graphic chipset (I have
ATI Rage 128)
The right XF86Config-4 file. I have :
Section "ServerLayout
[ELF]
<--- I don't understand that ??
Module Loader present
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sun Jan 21 22:12:56 2001
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
[...]
(--) Chipset ATI Rage 128 RF (AGP) found
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modul
franck wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm trying to get XFree 4.0.2 DRI work on my Debian Testing box.
> My video card is an ATI Rage Fury (Rage 128 with 32MB).
> I run kernel 2.4.0-test11, and installed XFree 4.0.2 from debs (I managed
> to find out
> I have to use ati and no more r128 out of the lis
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to get XFree 4.0.2 DRI work on my Debian Testing box.
My video card is an ATI Rage Fury (Rage 128 with 32MB).
I run kernel 2.4.0-test11, and installed XFree 4.0.2 from debs (I managed
to find out
I have to use ati and no more r128 out of the list, thanx !).
For DRI, I fol
and it was a snap. The driver is called "r128". They have
> pretty good documentation for how to get it running in the Release
> Notes.
sorry if this is redundant. there was a discussion on comp.os.linux.x
where someone mentioned a howto for this:
ati rage 128-howto: http://www4.n
are the cards using the
Rage 128 Pro chip.
Cheers,
Carlo
>> .
>> ((--) SVGA: PCI: ATI Rage 128 PF rev 0, Memory @ 0xe000, MMIO @
>> 0xefefc000, I/O @ 0xac00
>> Using XFree86 ATI driver version 4.7.
>> Unknown graphics controller detected.
>> Unknown
I had to upgrade to 4.0 you use my card. The debs aren't available yet
for reasons that have already been discussed on this list. However, you
can get the binaries or source code from xfree86.org. I used the
binaries and it was a snap. The driver is called "r128". They have
pretty good documen
r take it from server
>read
>sdb.suse.de/sdb/de/html/cg_rage128_63.html
>
>vale
>
>On Mit, 12 Jul 2000, Carlo U. Segre wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> Has anyone found a working driver for an ATI Rage 128 Pro AGP card?
>> I have tried the SVGA and it does not re
on suse6.3 you found a special file for this
or take it from server
read
sdb.suse.de/sdb/de/html/cg_rage128_63.html
vale
On Mit, 12 Jul 2000, Carlo U. Segre wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> Has anyone found a working driver for an ATI Rage 128 Pro AGP card?
> I have tried the SVGA and
Hello All:
Has anyone found a working driver for an ATI Rage 128 Pro AGP card?
I have tried the SVGA and it does not recognize the card, but tries to
operate it and I get a blank display which can be terminated with
Ctl-Alt-Backspace. A dump of the xserver's output is below as is the
/pro
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 09:59:40PM +, José Luis Gómez Dans generated a
stream of 1s and 0s:
> Hi!
> I have so far been experiencing erratic svgalib behaviour.
> Basically, if I call something like zgv, I get the following message:
> c172d
> Int 0x10 is not in rom (:)
> No VESA bi
Hi!
I have so far been experiencing erratic svgalib behaviour.
Basically, if I call something like zgv, I get the following message:
c172d
Int 0x10 is not in rom (:)
No VESA bios detected!
Try running vga_reset.
and zgv (or whatever) runs in VGA mode, instead of SVGA mode.
On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 04:17:09PM +0100, Sergey Lishchuk wrote:
> Hi
>
> What X server must I use to make potato work with
> ATI Rage 128 VR (AGP) video card? VGA16 works, but
> I need larger resolution. SVGA does not work. I tried
> to install manually the SUSE package XF
Hi
What X server must I use to make potato work with
ATI Rage 128 VR (AGP) video card? VGA16 works, but
I need larger resolution. SVGA does not work. I tried
to install manually the SUSE package XFCom_Rage128,
but unsuccesfully.
Thank you!
Sergey
aTHhH
Hi all,
I had some emails with ATI, and they supplied a spreadsheet containing the
compatibles VESA modes with existing X-server in Linux.
I think it could be interesting for people who experienced problem with this
card.
BTW, I asked ATI when they will give information to the xfree86 staff, in o
92 matches
Mail list logo
