Re: at version oddity

2008-06-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-06-04 16:15:09, schrieb Sven Joachim: > In the at source tree, configure.in specifies > > VERSION="3.1.9" Which should be normaly a macro... > so apparently the maintainer forgot to increase it for the 3.1.10 upload > (3.1.10.1 was an NMU). Nothing to worry about, but you should report

Re: at version oddity

2008-06-04 Thread Bob Cox
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 16:15:09 +0200, Sven Joachim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > In the at source tree, configure.in specifies > > VERSION="3.1.9" > > so apparently the maintainer forgot to increase it for the 3.1.10 upload > (3.1.10.1 was an NMU). Nothing to worry about, but you should repor

Re: at version oddity

2008-06-04 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-06-04 14:39 +0200, Bob Cox wrote: > Is it possible I have installed it incorrectly, or is 'at' displaying > the wrong version? The latter. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy at > at: > Installed: 3.1.10.1 > Candidate: 3.1.10.1 > Version table: > *** 3.1.10.1 0 > 500 h

at version oddity

2008-06-04 Thread Bob Cox
Is it possible I have installed it incorrectly, or is 'at' displaying the wrong version? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy at at: Installed: 3.1.10.1 Candidate: 3.1.10.1 Version table: *** 3.1.10.1 0 500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org lenny/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/stat