Re: at is broken

2005-01-06 Thread Aldebaran
On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:26 am, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:32:35AM -0500, Aldebaran wrote: > > After thrashing back and forth in man pages and at.allow and at.deny I > > found that at has a bug. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=115295 > > > > Now at th

Re: at is broken

2005-01-06 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 05:27:06AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:32:35AM -0500, Aldebaran wrote: > > So I think I managed to patch at properly, and in man dpkg I learned that > > all > > I need to do is dpkg -b at-3.1.8 and dpkg would kindly package all that > > stuff >

Re: at is broken

2005-01-06 Thread Sam Watkins
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:32:35AM -0500, Aldebaran wrote: > So I think I managed to patch at properly, and in man dpkg I learned that all > I need to do is dpkg -b at-3.1.8 and dpkg would kindly package all that stuff > up into a nice pretty .deb and within minutes I would be doing important >

Re: at is broken

2005-01-06 Thread Roland M. Kruggel
-- Roland Kruggel IT-Security Coordinator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: at is broken

2005-01-06 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:32:35AM -0500, Aldebaran wrote: > After thrashing back and forth in man pages and at.allow and at.deny I found > that at has a bug. > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=115295 > > Now at that bug report there is a patch. I managed to apply the patch but

at is broken

2005-01-06 Thread Aldebaran
After thrashing back and forth in man pages and at.allow and at.deny I found that at has a bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=115295 Now at that bug report there is a patch. I managed to apply the patch but one hunk got rejected but that was for the change log so I imagine th