On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 4:03 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> About timestamps and incremental backup:
>
> If you only go for mtime, them you miss changes of file attributes
> which are indicated by ctime.
> Even more, timestamps alone are not a reliable way to determine which
> files are new at their
Hi,
David Christensen wrote:
> I have a SOHO file server with ~1 TB of data. I would like archive the data
> by burning it to a series of optical discs organized by time (e.g. mtime).
> I expect to periodically burn additional discs in the future, each covering
> a span of time from
On 1/22/24 20:30, Charles Curley wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:27:51 -0800
David Christensen wrote:
debian-user:
I have a SOHO file server with ~1 TB of data. I would like archive
the data by burning it to a series of optical discs organized by time
(e.g. mtime). I expect to periodically
On 1/22/24 19:44, gene heskett wrote:
On 1/22/24 21:28, David Christensen wrote:
debian-user:
I have a SOHO file server with ~1 TB of data. I would like archive
the data by burning it to a series of optical discs organized by time
(e.g. mtime). I expect to periodically burn additional
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:27:51 -0800
David Christensen wrote:
> debian-user:
>
> I have a SOHO file server with ~1 TB of data. I would like archive
> the data by burning it to a series of optical discs organized by time
> (e.g. mtime). I expect to periodically burn addition
On 1/22/24 21:28, David Christensen wrote:
debian-user:
I have a SOHO file server with ~1 TB of data. I would like archive the
data by burning it to a series of optical discs organized by time (e.g.
mtime). I expect to periodically burn additional discs in the future,
each covering a span
debian-user:
I have a SOHO file server with ~1 TB of data. I would like archive the
data by burning it to a series of optical discs organized by time (e.g.
mtime). I expect to periodically burn additional discs in the future,
each covering a span of time from the previous last disc to the
Hi folks,
apparently the jessie archive repository is still alive, but if I try to
update the package list there is an error message
W: GPG error: http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
comp:
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading state information... Done
> E: The package virtualbox-7.0 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an
> archive for it.
> (base) comp@AbNormal:~$
>>
>> Depending on the current stat
package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
E: The package virtualbox-7.0 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an
archive for it.
(base) comp@AbNormal:~$
Please advise.
VirtualBox isn't in the official Debian repositories, so you likely
use
ge lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading state information... Done
> E: The package virtualbox-7.0 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an
> archive for it.
> (base) comp@AbNormal:~$
>
> Please advise.
VirtualBox isn't in the official Debian re
ers, the Debian mirrors team is separating the access methods to different
> host names:
>
> http://archive.debian.org/ will remain the entry point for HTTP clients such
> as APT
>
> rsync://rsync.archive.debian.org/debian-archive/ is now available for those
> who wish to mir
http://archive.debian.org/ will remain the entry point for HTTP clients such as
APT
rsync://rsync.archive.debian.org/debian-archive/ is now available for those who
wish to mirror all or parts of the archives.
rsync service on archive.debian.org has stopped, and we encourage anyone using
the servi
The Mailman3 mailing list forwarding, administration, and archive display all
worked here under Bullseye. The symptom I see now is that when I try to view a
mailing list archive with a web browser, I see a spinning star where I
previously saw data.
In addition to the package upgrades, I
t the result is very
unwieldy to store or access, and you have to be sure the filesystem is
in a ready state to be cloned or information that has not hit the disk
(in data structures in memory or buffer cache) could be lost, so it's
not generally recommended as a tool to produce a file archive.
On 5/4/23 23:46, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 5/5/23 14:21, David Christensen wrote:
If the file is a some kind of archive (e.g. tar(1)), both the data
and metadata are inside the tarball and the full-circle results
should be identical.
Not quite. The file times are usually changed in the un-tar
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 21:19:55 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Sorry, that was my fault. I should have given the link to outcome of
> the vote as well, it was Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in
> installer, one installer"[1].
Thank you. My question is answered.
--
Does anybody read signat
On 2023-01-28 13:11 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 19:05:39 +
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
>> This all follows on the General Resolution a while ago.
>
> Right. I looked at the page to which Sven Joachim
> referred. https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003 Some of the
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 19:05:39 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> This all follows on the General Resolution a while ago.
Right. I looked at the page to which Sven Joachim
referred. https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003 Some of the
proposals explicitly required the installer to do so. However
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:09:27 +0100
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > To use the new section, edit sources.list like this:
> >
> > before:
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
> >
> > after:
> > deb http:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:09:27 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> To use the new section, edit sources.list like this:
>
> before:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
>
> after:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
> non-free-firmware
Will th
Some news for you who are running unstable or testing/bookworm and have
firmware packages installed from non-free (most users who do not run
Debian in a VM probably have): these firmware packages are being moved
to a new section non-free-firmware, and you should update your
sources.list(5) entries
On Fri 30 Sep 2022 at 15:47:21 (-0700), David Hoff Jr wrote:
> I am attempting to install 32 bit Debian 7 to a old netbook which is the
> last version of Debian where the text to speech voice Voxin IBM voice
> works correctly in the console..
> In the text installer, when given the choice to choose
I am attempting to install 32 bit Debian 7 to a old netbook which is the
last version of Debian where the text to speech voice Voxin IBM voice
works correctly in the console..
In the text installer, when given the choice to choose a mirror I choose
choice number 1 which is to do it manually. I am t
t the URL format in the
List-Archive: header by such a "?m=" text snippet.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> something's wrong with the msgid-search URLs for Message-Ids with "/".
This issue has been present for a long time unfortunately.
> Does anybody have an idea how to follow the List-Archive hint without
> entering the Message-Id part manually int
Hi,
something's wrong with the msgid-search URLs for Message-Ids with "/".
In Andrew M.A. Cater's mail to this list
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:30:10 +
Message-ID:
i read and credulenltly forwarded to Massimo Maiurana:
List-Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/msgi
On 14.08.21 13:36, Linux-Fan wrote:
Andrew M.A. Cater writes:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
>
> Hello! Is there somewhere publicly accessible an archive of the
> conversations taking place in the #debian[*] OFTC channels? Would be
great,
> beca
Andrew M.A. Cater writes:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
>
> Hello! Is there somewhere publicly accessible an archive of the
> conversations taking place in the #debian[*] OFTC channels? Would be great,
> because I am not constantly online and thus
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Marco Möller wrote:
>
> Hello! Is there somewhere publicly accessible an archive of the
> conversations taking place in the #debian[*] OFTC channels? Would be great,
> because I am not constantly online and thus am unable to fully follow
>
Hello! Is there somewhere publicly accessible an archive of the
conversations taking place in the #debian[*] OFTC channels? Would be
great, because I am not constantly online and thus am unable to fully
follow conversations there.
---
Always stay in good spirits!
Marco
15 [S] [expires: 2021-04-14]
pub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [SC] [expires: 2025-05-20]
E1CF 20DD FFE4 B89E 8026 58F1 E0B1 1894 F66A EC98
uid [ unknown] Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key
(9/stretch)
sub rsa4096 2017-05-22 [S] [expires: 2025-05-20]
pub rsa4096 2014-11-21 [SC] [ex
On 2017-10-11 11:33 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>>
>> Since libreoffice takes 6-18 hours to build on the buildds, this happens
>> with every libreoffice upload. :-(
>>
>
> Since I don't understand all the implications of the bug report
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> Since libreoffice takes 6-18 hours to build on the buildds, this happens
> with every libreoffice upload. :-(
>
Since I don't understand all the implications of the bug report:
Will it be the case that libreoffice (and apparently other pa
all 1:5.4.2-1 install ok installed
> libreoffice-common:all 1:5.2.7-1 stable ftp.fr.debian.org
> No stable-updates version
> libreoffice-common:all 1:5.4.1-1 testing ftp.fr.debian.org
> No unstable version
> No experimental version
> libreoffic
installed
> libreoffice-common:all 1:5.2.7-1 stable ftp.fr.debian.org
> No stable-updates version
> libreoffice-common:all 1:5.4.1-1 testing ftp.fr.debian.org
> No unstable version
> No experimental version
> libreoffic
org
No stable-updates version
libreoffice-common:all 1:5.4.1-1 testing ftp.fr.debian.org
No unstable version
No experimental version
libreoffice-common:all 1:5.4.2-1 newer than version in archive
^
Why "No unstable versi
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 16 Aug 2017 at 13:27:30 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > FYI just noticed that the debian-user archives have not been updated
> since
> > 10 August.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/08/thrd2.html
>
> gives me the mail you ha
On Wed 16 Aug 2017 at 13:27:30 -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> FYI just noticed that the debian-user archives have not been updated since
> 10 August.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/08/thrd2.html
gives me the mail you have posted. You will have to be more specific.
How did you acces
FYI just noticed that the debian-user archives have not been updated since
10 August.
On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 12/5/12, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>>> When I try to add armhf to my local debmirror archive, I get these
>>>> sorts of errors:
>>>>
>>&g
On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 12/5/12, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> When I try to add armhf to my local debmirror archive, I get these
>>> sorts of errors:
>>>
>>> dists/wheezy/non-free/binary-armhf/Packages.diff/2
I know this is a little old, but it is the same thread, I finally got
around to trying my next step, see below:
On 12/5/12, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> When I try to add armhf to my local debmirror archive, I get these
>> sorts of errors:
>>
>> d
ntelligent backup solution and a lot
of time to find the last correct file to restore.
So I would beliefe the best solution for you is either linux software raid or
ZFS. Both can verify your data and restore the correct data from the
parity/redundancy.
--
Don't Panic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
uch protection.
>
> Store error-correction data along the backups.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive
BTW, Debian has "par2" in the archive.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land o
Holschuh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130924190619.ga12...@khazad-dum.debian.net
r streaming HD media throughout the house.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5241dccf.2040...@yahoo.com
If I do use my desktop as a ZFS/NAS server, does the root file system have
to be ZFS as well?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130924183335.GA1930@phobos
; disk with ext3 for my daily tasks? If yes, should I run 64bit Debian or just
> use lots of RAM and PAE?
If your HW supports it, opt for 64 bit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
ubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130924030757.GA20255@phobos
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> When I try to add armhf to my local debmirror archive, I get these
> sorts of errors:
>
> dists/wheezy/non-free/binary-armhf/Packages.diff/2012-08-12-0215.28.gz
> failed sha1sum check, removing
I have at times seen those errors from broken mirrors.
I guess I should find a more specific list for debmirror questions...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caosgnssjxqjuftixztmopwamqzdo861c6m
When I try to add armhf to my local debmirror archive, I get these
sorts of errors:
dists/wheezy/non-free/binary-armhf/Packages.diff/2012-08-12-0215.28.gz
failed sha1sum check, removing
Do I need to look into dak, or something else, or should debmirror be
able to cope with these 3 archs at the
essed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120904104946.GA31727@tal
T Elcor wrote:
--- On Sat, 7/14/12, Camaleón wrote:
However, for mailing lists and forums I
prefer to use a NNTP newsreader, it does a better job.
I used to do that but then switched to a web-based mail list archive. It's just
more convenient for me as I don't have to downloa
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:01:09 -0700, T Elcor wrote:
> --- On Sat, 7/14/12, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> However, for mailing lists and forums I
>> prefer to use a NNTP newsreader, it does a better job.
>
> I used to do that but then switched to a web-based mail list a
uot;. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1342282077.86620.yahoomailclas...@web121906.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
--- On Sat, 7/14/12, Camaleón wrote:
> However, for mailing lists and forums I
> prefer to use a NNTP newsreader, it does a better job.
I used to do that but then switched to a web-based mail list archive. It's just
more convenient for me as I don't have to download messages
replaced?).
>
> Thanks Tom - I did have the key in my
> apt-key list
Then I wasn't of any help! But I'm glad that you fixed your problem...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
4096R/473041FA 2010-08-27 [expires: 2018-03-05]
uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) <
ftpmas...@debian.org>
On 23 March 2012 00:41, Tom H wrote:
> lOn Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Robert King
> wrote:
> >
> > What am I doing wrong here?
hed 837 B in 2s (336 B/s)
> Reading package lists... Done
> W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release: The
> following signatures were invalid: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive
> Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)
>
> this is on the basis of the follo
amd64 Packages
Hit http://ftp.au.debian.org squeeze/non-free amd64 Packages
Fetched 837 B in 2s (336 B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release: The
following signatures were invalid: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive
Automatic Signing
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:18 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I get the gmail archive button in inbox view , but not in the label view.
> Is it not possible to archive messages from label view ?
>
Click the small [x] next to the Inbox label. This will remove the "Inbo
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:48:20 +0530, J. Bakshi wrote:
> I get the gmail archive button in inbox view , but not in the label
> view. Is it not possible to archive messages from label view ?
I guess that tagged/labeled e-mails have been already marked as
"archived" (mayb
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:18, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Is it not possible to archive messages from label view ?
OT indeed. Isn't there a debian-misc or something?
If you're in the label view and the message is also in the inbox,
select it and go to the "More" menu, Archive wil
Hello list,
I get the gmail archive button in inbox view , but not in the label view.
Is it not possible to archive messages from label view ?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
nce the system cannot fetch the packages from public repositories
> or internal mirrors, some way to create an archive with all necessary .deb
> packages would be nice. The archive is then transferred to the machine via
> e.g. usb.
>
> Would it be possible with a scheme like that?
&g
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: "Karl E. Jørgensen" [mailto:karl.jorgen...@nice.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2012 16:23
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Nonstandard .deb package management/apt problem: create
> archive with update
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:12:40PM +0100, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> [...]
> A system isolated from internet should receive standard distribution
> package updates. Since the system cannot fetch the packages from
> public repositories or internal mirrors, some way to create an ar
packages from public repositories or
internal mirrors, some way to create an archive with all necessary .deb
packages would be nice. The archive is then transferred to the machine via e.g.
usb.
Would it be possible with a scheme like that?
* The list of currently installed packages is extracted from
mirrors, some way to create an archive with all necessary .deb
packages would be nice. The archive is then transferred to the machine via e.g.
usb.
Would it be possible with a scheme like that?
* The list of currently installed packages is extracted from the isolated host
* On another host with
debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f08c576.7090...@walnut.gen.nz
subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f08804a.5070...@earthsong.free-online.co.uk
.
Thanks - this all looks useful.
andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ef9f8ac.7090...@earthsong.free-online.co.uk
os as well at some point.
>
> What I am looking for is a program which can take each of the
> components which make up buddycloud through the various steps of
> downloading a new version, building it, packaging it, and adding the
> package file to an archive. Ideally we want to be abl
each of the components
which make up buddycloud through the various steps of downloading a new
source version, building it, packaging it, and adding the package file
to an archive. Ideally we want to be able to have more than one release
- e.g. a bleeding edge dev release and a stable release
each of the components
which make up buddycloud through the various steps of downloading a new
version, building it, packaging it, and adding the package file to an
archive. Ideally we want to be able to have more than one release - e.g.
a bleeding edge dev release and a stable release.
I have
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:23:23 -0700, Barry Mead wrote:
> Currently there is no-where on the internet whey you can download an ISO
> image of Debian Lenny. When will the Lenny release be added to this
> archive?
As others alredy pointed out, it is still available on the usual pa
uot;. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ee669fc.1070...@shadowcat.co.uk
On 12/12/11 19:41, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:23, Barry Mead wrote:
Currently there is no-where on the internet whey you can download an ISO image
of Debian Lenny.
Sure there is:
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#old
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/5.0.9/i386/
http
On Monday 12 December 2011 19:23:23 Barry Mead wrote:
> Currently there is no-where on the internet whey you can download an ISO
> image of Debian Lenny. When will the Lenny release be added to this
> archive?
>
> Thanks, Barry Mead
I could let you have a Lenny iso image, if
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:23, Barry Mead wrote:
> Currently there is no-where on the internet whey you can download an ISO image
> of Debian Lenny.
Sure there is:
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#old
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/5.0.9/i386/
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/a
Currently there is no-where on the internet whey you can download an ISO image
of Debian Lenny. When will the Lenny release be added to this archive?
Thanks, Barry Mead
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Well, maybe it could be an issue with Ark itself, you have lightweight
options you could test, like XArchiver and Squeeze
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Thanks for the suggestion, I just now installed libarchive-ar-perl,
but Ark still cannot recognize AR archive :-(
Strangely, it can open .DEB which is also a type of AR archive, but
not "pure" AR archives themselves.
-- Satish.BD
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 15:59, Iuri Guilherme dos Sant
Also check if you have the proper libraries
My search returned this package:
libarchive-ar-perl
Maintained by: Debian Perl Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
On Du, 04 dec 11, 12:36:31, bd satish wrote:
>
> I know that I can view/extract the archive using CLI ("ar t" and "ar
> x") but would like to do it in GUI mode, with Ark. Note that, I'm not
> interested in modifying the archive, just "view" it a
Hi,
Like y'all know, AR archive is used for static libraries [ libxyz.a ].
When opening it with Ark (KDE 4.4.5, Squeeze), it pops with with error
"Unable to determine archive type". Instead it presents a list of all
archive formats which it recognizes, but this list does not inc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2009065415.2ce304a0.wea...@riseup.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2009065502.0ea41577.wea...@riseup.net
On Ma, 08 nov 11, 17:12:37, Richard wrote:
>
> Hi Andrei
> I have two mail accounts, Virgin ( gmail) and freeparking which is POP3,
> I don't want to use the POP mail for this list due to the volume of mail, so
> the only way around it for
> this list is to BCC myself.
> This is the only list I h
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:24:54 +0200
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Vi, 07 oct 11, 19:34:12, Richard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > How long does it take for posted messages to be archived ?
> > I'm not seeing what I've posted, either on list or archive,
> > or is
On Vi, 07 oct 11, 19:34:12, Richard wrote:
> Hi,
> How long does it take for posted messages to be archived ?
> I'm not seeing what I've posted, either on list or archive,
> or is my posting being held for moderation ?.
>
> Or have I got a problem again with Virginm
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:34:12 +0100, Richard wrote:
> How long does it take for posted messages to be archived ?
Archive web page will say (at the bottom):
sm01@stt008:~$ LANG=C; date
Fri Oct 7 20:52:59 CEST 2011
***
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/10/thrd2.html
The last update
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 19:34:12 +0100
Richard wrote:
Hello Richard,
> How long does it take for posted messages to be archived ?
Should happen, more or less, as soon as the message hits the servers,
assuming it's not held for moderation.
> Or have I got a problem again with Virginmedia, ISP.
The
Hi,
How long does it take for posted messages to be archived ?
I'm not seeing what I've posted, either on list or archive,
or is my posting being held for moderation ?.
Or have I got a problem again with Virginmedia, ISP.
--
Best wishes / 73
e-mail: rich...@g8jvm.com
Richar
py6TKqr6
>>
>> I have enabled DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text, so that I can see the text a lot
>> easier in a remote console, and the error I am getting is
>>
>> Checking the Debian archive mirror ..25%..50%..100%
>> !! ERROR: Bad archive mirror
>>
>> I have c
t
> easier in a remote console, and the error I am getting is
>
> Checking the Debian archive mirror ..25%..50%..100%
> !! ERROR: Bad archive mirror
>
> I have checked that I can get to the URL myself, and checked logs on
> the server as well, But I can't seem to find the root
it picks up the netboot initrd/vmlinuz fom
the server, and uses the following preseed file
http://pastebin.com/py6TKqr6
I have enabled DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text, so that I can see the text a lot
easier in a remote console, and the error I am getting is
Checking the Debian archive mirror ..25%..50
wnloads to occur
> during this window, automatically.
>
> The problem is that the sid boxes are not powered-up during this window
> so I cannot just simply schedule a cronjob to do an apt-get -d
> dist-upgrade.
>
> I would like my lenny box to do this on behalf of my sid boxes. I don
1 - 100 of 642 matches
Mail list logo
