On 2020-08-07 14:08 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 8/5/20 6:29 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I am not sure I understand what you actually want to do, though.
>>
>
> I am maintaining a set of meta packages, referencing the packages
> to install on my hosts. To avoid having separate meta packages for
On 8/5/20 6:29 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
I am not sure I understand what you actually want to do, though.
I am maintaining a set of meta packages, referencing the packages
to install on my hosts. To avoid having separate meta packages for
each new Debian version I have to use conditional depend
Hello,
perhaps options described here could help you:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.en.html
On 2020-08-05 12:33 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 8/5/20 11:03 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I am surprised to read that, considering that your installed lxc
>> version
>> does not actually fulfill the dependency. Note the epoch.
>> $ dpkg --compare-versions 1:2.0.11-1~xgo90+1 lt 3 || echo 'Got i
On 8/5/20 11:03 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
I am surprised to read that, considering that your installed lxc version
does not actually fulfill the dependency. Note the epoch.
$ dpkg --compare-versions 1:2.0.11-1~xgo90+1 lt 3 || echo 'Got it!'
Got it!
Maintaining the sample-lxc package I have no
On 2020-08-05 09:42 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I've got a problem with upgrading a private package in Stretch. The control
> file says:
>
> Package: sample-lxc
> Architecture: all
> Depends: ${misc:Depends}
> , cgmanager | systemd
> , debootstrap
>
Hi folks,
I've got a problem with upgrading a private package in Stretch. The control
file says:
Package: sample-lxc
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}
, cgmanager | systemd
, debootstrap
, lxc
, lxc-
On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:43:43 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Lately this has been happening when I use aptitude to update at the
> command line.
>
> http://paste.debian.net/171569
>
> It seems to get the update information fine, but then when I "aptitude
> full-upgrade" it fails to find any of t
Lately this has been happening when I use aptitude to update at
the command line.
http://paste.debian.net/171569
It seems to get the update information fine, but
then when I "aptitude full-upgrade" it fails to
find any of the IP addresses.
If I run full-upgrade a second time, it runs
normally.
Dne, 19. 04. 2011 01:17:34 je Alan McConnell napisal(a):
A general point, for the wonderful Debian developers:
I feel that this apt-cdrom action should have been done
automatically at the install, as it was with my
etch DVDs.
At some po
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:34:52AM +0200, Bj?rn Michelsen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:32:05PM -0400, Alan McConnell wrote:
>
> > I am starting to feel that the database of all that is one these
> > disks is not available to me. Are the disks perhaps flawed? (hard
> > to believe, since the
Hi Daniel,
Just let you know that I have sorted the problem. I reboot the machine, then
tried tha command again, then it worked, I have been able to login to the new
lenny.
Thanks for your help.
All the best
Bin
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, B. Liu wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Just let you know that I used a
Hi Daniel,
Just let you know that I used a local university mirror for the upgrade,
because I don't have internet connection for this machine.
Thanks
Bin
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, B. Liu wrote:
uname -a
Linux on02--srl 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 12 05:49:32 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
strace
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:46:15AM +, "B. Liu" was
heard to say:
> I download the aptitude_0.4.11.11-1~lenny1_amd64.deb package, using dpkg to
> install, it hangs as well. My machines is dell poweredge 1950 64-bit Quad
> core.
What's the output if you run "strace dpkg --install (deb file
Dear All,
I am in the middle of upgraing from etch to lenny.
I run apt-get update. This complained about an unknown key.
Then run: apt-get install debian-keyring debian-archive-keyring
and run: apt-key update
then run: aptitude update
then run: aptitude install apt dpkg aptitude
However when un
Well, an update seems to have solved the problem. I now get the proper
number of packages and of course I found gdb. I shouldn't have panicked
so quickly.
A.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 22:12:10 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I've uploaded a version of aptitude to experimental that should fix
> this problem. I'd appreciate it if people who are hitting this bug
> could download it and let me know whether it works for them.
The new version works for me.
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 22:12 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I've uploaded a version of aptitude to experimental that should fix
> this problem. I'd appreciate it if people who are hitting this bug
> could download it and let me know whether it works for them.
Is it in "incoming" right now (0.4.4-5
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 22:12 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I've uploaded a version of aptitude to experimental that should fix
> this problem. I'd appreciate it if people who are hitting this bug
> could download it and let me know whether it works for them.
Will do. Will report back if I see any
I've uploaded a version of aptitude to experimental that should fix
this problem. I'd appreciate it if people who are hitting this bug
could download it and let me know whether it works for them.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 19:08:54 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Does anyone have a package installation command that will reproduce
> this on up-to-date unstable? I think I may have a fix, but through
> various stupidities I lost my test case and can't confirm it.
I currently see the following
Does anyone have a package installation command that will reproduce
this on up-to-date unstable? I think I may have a fix, but through
various stupidities I lost my test case and can't confirm it.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Hmmm..
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andy Hawkins<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, it's now doing this:
>
> gently:~# aptitude -f dist-upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... D
Hi,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Douglas Allan Tutty<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ouch is right. In your origional message, you wondered if something was
> broken at your end or the other. I guess you now know that its
> something at your end. :((
I'm not so sure. It is complainin
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:55:25PM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Douglas Allan Tutty<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fire up aptitude interactively (no command line arguments) and see
> > what's up.
>
> gently:~# aptitude
> Ouch! Got SIGABRT, dying..
> Ab
Hi,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Douglas Allan Tutty<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fire up aptitude interactively (no command line arguments) and see
> what's up.
gently:~# aptitude
Ouch! Got SIGABRT, dying..
Aborted
Andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:33:27AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My box automatically runs aptitude overnight to update the packages list,
> and download any packages that need upgrading. It doesn't install them, I'd
> rather do that myself.
>
> However, it's now doing this:
>
> gentl
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:33:27AM +, Andy Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Anyone got any ideas? Is this something broken my end, or a broken package?
It's an aptitude bug.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Tue, 1 May 2007 07:25:33 -0400
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:33:27AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My box automatically runs aptitude overnight to update the packages
> > list, and download any packages that need upgrading. It doesn
Hi,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roberto C Sánchez<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sort of unrelated, but why not use cron-apt?
Can't remember off the top of my head, but when I tried it I couldn't get it
to do exactly what I wanted. Maybe I'll revisit it.
Anyone help with the update
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:33:27AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My box automatically runs aptitude overnight to update the packages list,
> and download any packages that need upgrading. It doesn't install them, I'd
> rather do that myself.
>
Sort of unrelated, but why not use cron-ap
Hi all,
My box automatically runs aptitude overnight to update the packages list,
and download any packages that need upgrading. It doesn't install them, I'd
rather do that myself.
However, it's now doing this:
gently:~# aptitude -f dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:01:53AM +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> Hi,
>
> doing an upgrade I encountered among others the following problem: I
> so far used apt-get, but following the release notes I switched to
> aptitude. But as a result much to much packages were installed:
> So my question:
Hi,
doing an upgrade I encountered among others the following problem: I
so far used apt-get, but following the release notes I switched to
aptitude. But as a result much to much packages were installed:
Before the upgrade I did still with sarge sources an "aptitude
dist-upgrade" - with the resul
34 matches
Mail list logo
