Martin wrote:
> I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
> then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
Not if you use a preferences file with pinning. Aptitude honours
it. Synaptic ignores it.
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian
On 2010-03-15 01:06 +0100, Omar Campagne wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote:
>> Martin wrote:
>> >I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
>> >then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
>> >They both use same database of instal
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> Martin wrote:
> >I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
> >then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
> >They both use same database of installed packages, right?
> >I guess the answer is 'yes' -
Martin wrote:
I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
They both use same database of installed packages, right?
I guess the answer is 'yes' - I just want to be sure.
Martin
yes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
I mean can I install/deinstall packages once with aptitude
then with synaptic without worry that something will break?
They both use same database of installed packages, right?
I guess the answer is 'yes' - I just want to be sure.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.deb
OK, I have to jump in since there seems to be a lot of misinformation
going around.
Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is one snag. Aptitude keeps a note of packages that have been
> installed manually (as opposed to being installed automatically as
> dependencies). The result is that
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:39, Chris Lale wrote this for perusal by us all:
>---> Black Dew wrote:
>--->
>---> > kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>---> >
>---> >> Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to
>---> >> mix apt-get
Black Dew wrote:
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to
mix apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?
Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
Both
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix
apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?
Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
Both synaptic and aptitude are
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix
apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and
aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?
Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
Both synaptic and aptitude are
Is it OK to mix aptitude and synaptic? I know that it is not good to mix apt-get and aptitude. But what about using synaptic sometimes and aptitude sometimes? any suggestions?Please CC me on the replies as I am not subscribe to d-u.
thanksraju
The recent discussion about 'apt-get' and 'aptitude' was interesting
and useful (I've used 'aptitude' for years). It appeared that the
consensus was not to mix the two.
What about 'aptitude' and 'synaptic'?
Is it "safe" to use on
Does Synaptic's ability to "remove including any orphaned dependencies"
do as good a job as the inate abilities of aptitude?
I've recently abandoned apt in favor of aptitude for its ability to
track and automatically remove unneeded dependencies. However, I really
like Synaptic, but want to be s
13 matches
Mail list logo
