On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, David Kanter wrote:
: Is this bad: having a stable box (i.e., Slink) but using apt to
: update some files from the "unstable" tree?
Depends on what "bad" means to you:
o It should be alright in the sense that apt will take care of
dependencies for you, so there should be n
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 09:06:34AM -0500, David Kanter wrote:
> Is this bad: having a stable box (i.e., Slink) but using apt to update some
> files from the "unstable" tree?
Nope. *some* instability might occur, but that doesn't mean it is bad.
Just be sensable on what you're doing and it sho
Is this bad: having a stable box (i.e., Slink) but using apt to update some
files from the "unstable" tree?
Here's why: I have Slink and downloaded Netscape 4.61 from the unstable tree.
Why? Getting a stable Netscape never seemed to work; not all the necessary
files would download, so I opted t
3 matches
Mail list logo
