* rhkra...@gmail.com [2018-12-25 09:21 -0500]:
[...]
> But now I'm at this point:
>
> root@s31:~# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
> firmwa
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:21:39 -0500
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> [snip]
>
> But now I'm at this point:
>
> root@s31:~# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been kep
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 09:21:39AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, it helped a lot -- I seem to have one problem remaining
> (below).
[...]
> df told me that /var was at 100%, and /boot was at 98%.
"apt-get autoclean" or its more drastic sibling "apt-get clean" might be
Thanks for the reply, it helped a lot -- I seem to have one problem remaining
(below).
On Monday, December 24, 2018 06:22:58 PM Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> You need to
> # apt install firmware-realtek
Ok, I did the apt-get install firmware-realtek and that got rid of the
complaints about the 816
Thanks very much -- that helped a lot -- there is one outstanding problem,
but, for various reasons, I don't have time for a full reply atm -- I'll try
to reply more fully tomorrow or the day after.
On Monday, December 24, 2018 06:22:58 PM Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * rh kramer [2018-12-24 18:
* rh kramer [2018-12-24 18:10 -0500]:
> On my Jessie system, for something like the last 2 to 3 months, I've been
> getting an error like the following whenever I do an apt-get update /
> apt-get upgrade cycle.
[...]
> Ok, it looks like I have the r8169 as I see this:
>
> r8169
On my Jessie system, for something like the last 2 to 3 months, I've been
getting an error like the following whenever I do an apt-get update /
apt-get upgrade cycle.
I've been ignoring it, hoping it would go away with some future update, but
so far it hasn't.
The (edited) error message is shown
> From: a...@cityscape.co.uk
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 18:21:15 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 17:39 (UTC-0400):
>> > > 27 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
>> > Need to get 68.5 MB of archives.> After this o
On Fri 21 Jul 2017 at 00:43:08 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> Joe Pfeiffer composed on 2017-07-20 15:38 (UTC-0600):
>
> > David Wright wrote:
>
> >> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>
> >> I did. Where d
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
> On 20-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > If you have minimal install, why do you suspect that something is
> > > wrong, rather to suppose that all is fine and that si
On 20-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> wrote:
>
> >
> > If you have minimal install, why do you suspect that something is
> > wrong, rather to suppose that all is fine and that simply there was
> > no security updates for your install? It is stable
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:55:15 + (UTC) david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find this unusual.
>
> And so, un
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
> On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
Joe Pfeiffer composed on 2017-07-20 15:38 (UTC-0600):
> David Wright wrote:
>> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>> I did. Where does it say that?
> The closest thing to that statement I've encountered is i
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:41:33 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 07:05 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
David Wright writes:
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>>
>> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
>> > etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
>>
> Op 20-07-17 om 18:58 schreef Fungi4All:
>> Does it matter what we all think, even if agree or it matters what
>> the manual of the package says. In my installation this is manual
>> I found, it says apt all over the place, meanwhile there is apt-get
>> package to install. /usr/share/man/man8/apt-
Op 20-07-17 om 18:58 schreef Fungi4All:
Does it matter what we all think, even if agree or it matters what
the manual of the package says. In my installation this is manual
I found, it says apt all over the place, meanwhile there is apt-get
package to install. /usr/share/man/man8/apt-get.8.gz
> From: deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Agreed. I was beginning to despair of this list while reading through
> this thread. But we seem to live in times when evidence matters less
> and less, and assertion more and more.
> Sorry about the politics. Anyway, AFAICT acco
On Thu 20 Jul 2017 at 21:21:08 (+1000), Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 20.07.17 03:27, Felix Miata wrote:
> > David Wright composed on 2017-07-19 23:33 (UTC-0500):
> >
> > > On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> >
> > >> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-g
On 20.07.17 03:27, Felix Miata wrote:
> David Wright composed on 2017-07-19 23:33 (UTC-0500):
>
> > On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>
> > I did. Where does it say that?
>
> It was a long time ago that I
David Wright composed on 2017-07-19 23:33 (UTC-0500):
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
> I did. Where does it say that?
It was a long time ago that I first encountered it, and don't remember where it
was. I
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
> wrote:
>
> > On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > >>> Getting no results from ap
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
this unusual.
And so, understandably, you feel prompted to seek confirmation that
there have, in fact, been no u
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> > etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> > this unusual. Did a mail li
On 07/19/2017 07:05 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
wrote:
On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:13:06 -0400 Fungi4All
wrote:
> From: nemomm...@gmail.com
>
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:32:04 -0400 Dan Ritter
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> >> > app
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> >>> apps,
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 18:21:15 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 17:39 (UTC-0400):
>
> >> Brian composed:
> >> One picture is worth a thousand words:
> ...
> > Here is a picture from my backup machine
> > $ sudo apt upgrade
> ...
> > 27 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 t
Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 17:39 (UTC-0400):
>> Brian composed:
>> One picture is worth a thousand words:
...
> Here is a picture from my backup machine
> $ sudo apt upgrade
...
> 27 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> Need to get 68.5 MB of archives.> After this
> From: a...@cityscape.co.uk
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> One picture is worth a thousand words:
Here is a picture from my backup machine
$ sudo apt upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following NE
> From: a...@cityscape.co.uk
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 16:20:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> One picture is worth a thousand words:
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
n
> Which should be trusted more. apt-get or apt?
I've always liked apt. It is four keystrokes shorter
From: nemomm...@gmail.com
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:32:04 -0400 Dan Ritter
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
>> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
>> >
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 16:20:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Brian composed on 2017-07-19 20:54 (UTC+0100):
>
> > On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:49:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>
> >> > But will there be different results with apt upgrade than w
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:57:50 -0400 Felix Miata
wrote:
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find this unusual. Did a mail list
On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
find this unusual. Did
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:32:04 -0400 Dan Ritter
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find this unusual. Did a mail l
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
> On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this,
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:54:28 +0100
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>Those sort of statements are begging for an example of the diferences
>with an upgrade or package installation. Will we see it?
I seem to recall there have been several examples over the past year or
so on this very list. A search
Brian composed on 2017-07-19 20:54 (UTC+0100):
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:49:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>> > But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
>> Will:I have no idea.
>> Can: Yes.
>> Apt and
> From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>>> mrma...@earthlink.net composed:
> ...
>>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>> But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
>
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:49:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>
> >> mrma...@earthlink.net composed:
> ...
> >> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>
> > But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>> mrma...@earthlink.net composed:
...
>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
> But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
Will: I have no idea.
Can:Yes.
Apt and apt-get are not identica
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:18:20 -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> > From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
> >> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> >> etc., but get no security or str
> From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
>> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
>> this unusual. Did a mail list
On 19-07-17, Felix Miata wrote:
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> > etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> > this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this,
Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
> anything specific. Or d
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
> anything specifi
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
> anything specific. Or did I miss the solution
Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
anything specific. Or did I miss the solution?
My Test Setup:
Stretch Stable 64-bit fr
On 2017-06-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:01:30AM +, Curt wrote:
>> Because of the pedagogical interest of the thing, for those who come
>> after us, for posterity's sake, I wanted the OP to give us a complete
>> description of what occurred, rather than a misleading one
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:01:30AM +, Curt wrote:
> Because of the pedagogical interest of the thing, for those who come
> after us, for posterity's sake, I wanted the OP to give us a complete
> description of what occurred, rather than a misleading one (for we are
> left wondering why FF was h
On 2017-06-25, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 22 Jun 2017 at 19:44:27 (+), Curt wrote:
>> On 2017-06-22, Mike McClain wrote:
>> >
>> > Rather than telling me why FF was held back it just went ahead and
>> > installed it.
>> >
>>
>> Is that the complete description of what you observed? You're
On Thu 22 Jun 2017 at 19:44:27 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2017-06-22, Mike McClain wrote:
> >
> > Rather than telling me why FF was held back it just went ahead and
> > installed it.
> >
>
> Is that the complete description of what you observed? You're not
> leaving anything out, are you?
>
> --
On 2017-06-22, Mike McClain wrote:
>
> Rather than telling me why FF was held back it just went ahead and
> installed it.
>
Is that the complete description of what you observed? You're not
leaving anything out, are you?
--
"It might be a vision--of a shell, of a wheelbarrow, of a fairy kingdo
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 07:40:59PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 04:56 PM, Mike McClain wrote:
> >Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade iceweasel?
> >
> Have you tried typing "apt-get install firefox-esr"? It should tell
> you why it's held back.
Duh, I'm an id
On 2017-06-21, Carl Fink wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 04:56 PM, Mike McClain wrote:
>> When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
>> The following packages have been kept back:
>>firefox-esr
>> and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
>> Can someone point me at where to look to
Mike McClain wrote:
> When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
> The following packages have been kept back:
> firefox-esr
> and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
> Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade
> iceweasel? Thanks,
> Mike
> --
> As An
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Mike McClain wrote:
When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
The following packages have been kept back:
firefox-esr
and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade
iceweasel?
% man apt-get
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:56:45 -0700 Mike McClain
wrote:
> When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
> The following packages have been kept back:
> firefox-esr
> and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
> Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade
> ic
On 06/21/2017 04:56 PM, Mike McClain wrote:
When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
The following packages have been kept back:
firefox-esr
and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade iceweasel?
Have you tri
When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
The following packages have been kept back:
firefox-esr
and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade iceweasel?
Thanks,
Mike
--
As Andy Capp's wife said,
"You're only young
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 19:29:23 Sharon Kimble wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:17:15 -0500
>
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > >> David Goodenough wrote:
[snip]
> > > see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721130
> >
> > Hugo
>
>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:28:22 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:34:42PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Sharon Kimble wrote:
> > >Hugo.
> > >Please adjust you're posting style as it is impossible to read what
> > >you're saying as its indistinguishable from the rest of th
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:34:42PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Sharon Kimble wrote:
> >Hugo.
> >Please adjust you're posting style as it is impossible to read what
> >you're saying as its indistinguishable from the rest of the
> >conversation. It just appears that you're signing the email witho
Sharon Kimble wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:17:15 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
Calculating upgrade... Fail
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:17:15 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> David Goodenough wrote:
> >>> I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
> >>> >>> morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
> >>>
> >>> Calculating upgra
On Wednesday 28 Aug 2013, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> David Goodenough wrote:
> >>> I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
> >>> morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
> >>>
> >>> Calculating upgrade... Failed
>
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libenchant1c2a : Depends: aspel
David Goodenough wrote:
On Wednesday 28 Aug 2013, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libe
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libenchant1c2a : Depends: aspell-en but it is not going
On Wednesday 28 Aug 2013, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> David Goodenough wrote:
> > I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
> > morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
> >
> > Calculating upgrade... Failed
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > li
David Goodenough wrote:
I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libenchant1c2a : Depends: aspell-en but it is not going to be installed or
I have a sacrificial machine that I keep upto date with sid every
morning. Yesterday and today I get an error:-
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libenchant1c2a : Depends: aspell-en but it is not going to be installed or
mys
On Monday 16 January 2006 10:18 am, Don wrote:
> Ok so I had issues with my Debian system and got myself into a bind.
> Reloaded from woody CD's and ended up with mouse issues I could not fix.
> Threw in the towel and reloaded once again. Mouse works fine but now I
> have a problem in APT. When a
Don wrote:
dpkg: `update-rc.d' not found on PATH.
when I do as root:
which update-rc.d
I get:
/usr/sbin/update-rc.d
What do you get?
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok so I had issues
with my Debian system and got myself into a bind. Reloaded from woody CD's
and ended up with mouse issues I could not fix. Threw in the towel and
reloaded once again. Mouse works fine but now I have a problem in
APT. When attempting to upgrade to the latest versions of
When i use apt-get to upgrade my debian ,some softwares' configuration can't
be completed.It outputs as follows.
"ldconfig: /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2.desktop is not an ELF file - it
has the wrong magic bytes at the start."
What's the problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Ive done it after 2 weeks and I dont know how many hours !!
As far as I understand it
apt-get update
loads files into /var/lib/dpkg/info about the packages and the md5 sums for
those packages.
I got a corrupted download, the md5 sums were never going to match.
I hashed out debian.security
Am 03. Jul, 2001 schwäzte Rick Macdonald so:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Hank Marquardt wrote:
>
> > Maybe this is self evident to some, but I'm stuck ... I'm running
> > unstable, I hadn't upgraded in about a week -- then last night I did
> > and there were 128 packages to upgrade including most of KDE
Thanks Rick,
Worked like a charm.
Hank
> I upgraded from potato to testing and then to sid a few days ago and had
> the same problem but with a different filename. I just did this:
>
> dpkg -i --force-overwrite
> /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4%3a2.2.0-0beta1-1_i386.deb
>
> followed by this
Rick Macdonald wrote:
> I upgraded from potato to testing and then to sid a few days ago and had
> the same problem but with a different filename. I just did this:
>
> dpkg -i --force-overwrite
> /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4%3a2.2.0-0beta1-1_i386.deb
This sort of thing happens to me every
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Hank Marquardt wrote:
> Maybe this is self evident to some, but I'm stuck ... I'm running unstable, I
> hadn't upgraded in about a week -- then last night I did and there were 128
> packages to upgrade including most of KDE. After it fetched the archives it
> chugged about
Maybe this is self evident to some, but I'm stuck ... I'm running unstable, I
hadn't upgraded in about a week -- then last night I did and there were 128
packages to upgrade including most of KDE. After it fetched the archives it
chugged about half way though and then puked --
It indicates it
I've responded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s email about base-files, but postinstal
script for libopenldap looks broken. Can't help you with that.
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 04:53:32PM +1100, Martin Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the following errors when I ran apt-get upgrade.
>
> Configuring packages .
Hi,
I got the following errors when I ran apt-get upgrade.
Configuring packages ...
libopenldap-runtime failed to configure, with exit code 30
(Reading database ... 47778 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace base-files 2.1.10 (using .../base-files_2.1.11_all.deb) ...
U
86 matches
Mail list logo
