Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-04 Thread Bob Proulx
Adam Funk wrote: > Thomas Adam wrote: > > dist-upgrade should be used here. > > In what circumstances is 'upgrade' more appropriate than 'dist-upgrade'? The 'upgrade' keeps the list of packages installed on the system exactly the same. It does not allow changes. Topologically the package contou

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-04 Thread Joris Huizer
Adam Funk wrote: On Friday 02 July 2004 17:50, Thomas Adam wrote: --- Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Adam !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade dist-upgrade should be used here. In what circumstances is 'upgrade' more appropriate than 'dist-upgrade'? apt-get upgrade Will upgrade

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-04 Thread Adam Funk
On Friday 02 July 2004 17:50, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Adam > >> > !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade > > dist-upgrade should be used here. In what circumstances is 'upgrade' more appropriate than 'dist-upgrade'? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-03 Thread Adam Funk
Thanks to everyone for the advice. The `apt-get install blah ... blah` worked. I'll use dist-upgrade next time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-02 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _s. keeling_, on 07/02/04 16:44,typed: Incoming from Wolfgang Pfeiffer: On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 18:41, Thomas Adam wrote: !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade dist-upgrade should be used here. Sometimes in these situations I do a apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes dist-upgrade I'd a

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-02 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 22:28, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 18:41, Thomas Adam wrote: > > --- Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Adam > > > > > > !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade > > > > dist-upgrade should be used here. > > > > > Sometimes in these situa

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-02 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Wolfgang Pfeiffer: > On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 18:41, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > > > > !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade > > > > dist-upgrade should be used here. > > > > > Sometimes in these situations I do a > > > apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes dist-upgrade > > > > I'd adv

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-02 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 18:41, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Adam > > > > !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade > > dist-upgrade should be used here. > > > Sometimes in these situations I do a > > apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes dist-upgrade >

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-02 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Adam > > !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade dist-upgrade should be used here. > Sometimes in these situations I do a > apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes dist-upgrade > (more on I'd advise people learn how to 'snip' replies in future

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-07-02 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Hi Adam On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 15:41, Adam Funk wrote: > I just did an apt-get upgrade and it kept a lot of packages back. > I tried to apt-get install a few of them and it threatened to remove > packages I need. So I tried apt-get install back> and it thinks it can do it: > > !root! /home/ad

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-06-30 Thread Jules Dubois
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:48:45 +, Adam Funk wrote: > On Wednesday 30 June 2004 17:10, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > >> On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 13:41 +, Adam Funk wrote: >>> I just did an apt-get upgrade and it kept a lot of packages back. I >>> tried to apt-get install a few of them and it threatene

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-06-30 Thread Chris Metzler
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:25:04 +0100 (BST) Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If I started using aptitude and decided to go back to using apt-get, >> would any problems arise? > > Not really. They're interchangeable. That's not my understanding.

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-06-30 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I started using aptitude and decided to go back to using apt-get, > would any problems arise? Not really. They're interchangeable. -- Thomas Adam = "The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- http://linuxgazette.net "TAG Editor" -- http://l

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-06-30 Thread Adam Funk
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 17:10, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 13:41 +, Adam Funk wrote: >> I just did an apt-get upgrade and it kept a lot of packages back. >> I tried to apt-get install a few of them and it threatened to remove >> packages I need. > > I really enjoy "aptitude

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-06-30 Thread Karl Hegbloom
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 13:41 +, Adam Funk wrote: > I just did an apt-get upgrade and it kept a lot of packages back. > I tried to apt-get install a few of them and it threatened to remove > packages I need. I really enjoy "aptitude" for package management. It's interactive, and gives you mo

Re: apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-06-30 Thread Kai Grossjohann
What does "apt-get -u dist-upgrade" say? I usually use dist-upgrade instead of upgrade. Kai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

apt-get upgrade conflicts

2004-06-30 Thread Adam Funk
I just did an apt-get upgrade and it kept a lot of packages back. I tried to apt-get install a few of them and it threatened to remove packages I need. So I tried apt-get install and it thinks it can do it: !root! /home/adam # apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency