Re: apt-get upgrade behaviour versus apt-get install package with respect to netscape,

2000-10-15 Thread Walter Tautz
On 15 Oct 2000, David Z Maze wrote: > Michael P Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > MPS> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 11:08:34AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > WT> > WT> New versions of currently installed packages that cannot be > WT> upgraded without changing the install status of another packa

Re: apt-get upgrade behaviour versus apt-get install package with respect to netscape,

2000-10-15 Thread David Z Maze
Michael P Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MPS> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 11:08:34AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: WT> WT> New versions of currently installed packages that cannot be WT> upgraded without changing the install status of another package WT> will be left at their current version. An

Re: apt-get upgrade behaviour versus apt-get install package with respect to netscape,

2000-10-15 Thread Walter Tautz
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 11:08:34AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > > New versions of currently > > installed packages that cannot be upgraded without > > changing the install status of another package will > >

Re: apt-get upgrade behaviour versus apt-get install package with respect to netscape,

2000-10-15 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 11:08:34AM -0400, Walter Tautz wrote: > > New versions of currently > installed packages that cannot be upgraded without > changing the install status of another package will > be left at their current version. An update must be >

apt-get upgrade behaviour versus apt-get install package with respect to netscape,

2000-10-15 Thread Walter Tautz
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Walter Tautz wrote: > > > On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Andreas Goesele wrote: > > > Christopher W. Aiken writes: > > > > > Add: > > > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free > > > to your /etc/apt/sources.list and do an apt-get install netscape > >