On Du, 06 iul 14, 23:30:28, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out
> > > again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine
> > > that it will have much flatter performance curves
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out
> > again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine
> > that it will have much flatter performance curves up to very full on
> > an SSD. It would super awesome i
On Vi, 20 iun 14, 18:54:45, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> Of course now with SSDs that standard thinking needs to be thought out
> again. I haven't seen any benchmark data for full SSDs. I imagine
> that it will have much flatter performance curves up to very full on
> an SSD. It would super awesome if
B a écrit :
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>> What do you mean when you say "these blocks won't be free ..."
>> without defragmenting? Please explain. If you have references to
>> share that explained the details that would be great.
>
> Just think about this:
> * HD original = 1000
> * HD -5%.
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:24:32 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> What do you mean when you say "these blocks won't be free ..."
> without defragmenting? Please explain. If you have references to
> share that explained the details that would be great.
Just think about this:
* HD original = 1000
* HD -5%.
B wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > completely out of disk space. For that the reasonable amount of
> > disk space reserved is an absolute value that a system might need
> > on that partitions. That part really shouldn't be a percentage of
> > the disk but should be a finite reserved amount.
>
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:54:45 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> completely out of disk space. For that the reasonable amount of
> disk space reserved is an absolute value that a system might need
> on that partitions. That part really shouldn't be a percentage of
> the disk but should be a finite reserv
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this
> partition, I would suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace
> which may only be allocated by privileged processes. It is normally
> 5% of the diskspace of a partition. In your case this makes ca. 1.8
> GB.
Chris Bannister wrote, on 06/16/2014 00:27:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
...
>> For the "ext" family of file systems this can be done on the running system.
>
> The suspense is killing me. Is it a secret?
>
Of course it's not, we're dealing with FOSS ;-)
T
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this partition, I would
> suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace which may only be allocated by
> privileged processes. It is normally 5% of the diskspace of a partiti
If you are interested in retrieving some disk space on this partition, I would
suggest to reduce the percentage of diskspace which may only be allocated by
privileged processes. It is normally 5% of the diskspace of a partition. In
your case this makes ca. 1.8 GB. To me this seems more than ever n
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:22:55PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2,4K Feb 16 11:33 apt-file
> drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14K Jun 15 19:21 archives
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39M Jun 15 19:25 pkgcache.bin
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39M Jun 15 19:25 srcpkgcache.bin
Ahh!, that
On 2014-06-15 19:59 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Does this seem necessary?
>
> root@tal:~# apt-get clean
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% /
> root@tal:~# apt-get update
> [...]
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Si
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:59:20AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does this seem necessary?
>
> root@tal:~# apt-get clean
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% /
> [...]
> root@tal:~# apt-get update
> Hit http://ftp
Am Montag, 16. Juni 2014, 05:59:20 schrieb Chris Bannister:
> Hi,
Hi Chris,
> Does this seem necessary?
>
> root@tal:~# apt-get clean
> root@tal:~# df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% /
> [...]
> root@tal:~# apt-get update
> Hit http:/
Hi,
Does this seem necessary?
root@tal:~# apt-get clean
root@tal:~# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda536G 34G 266M 100% /
[...]
root@tal:~# apt-get update
Hit http://ftp.debian.org jessie InRelease
Hit http://security.debian.org jessie/updates InRelease
Hi
16 matches
Mail list logo
