Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-16 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > > > Woooahhh!!! I just swapped the two 4MB SIMMs to each other's slots. > > After rebooting, I can no longer cause the seg faulting. (And I *have* > > rebooted the machine before without curing the problem). Might be bad

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-11 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > > > Woooahhh!!! I just swapped the two 4MB SIMMs to each other's slots. > > After rebooting, I can no longer cause the seg faulting. (And I *have* > > rebooted the machine before without curing the problem). Might be bad

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-11 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Wayne Topa wrote: > [cut great list of tools (or is that list of great tools?)] > Be aware that these tools require the knowledge of what is going on > to > be used properly. "Knowledge of what is going on"? Leaves me out. :-b In all seriousness, thanks very much. :-)

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-11 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree Date: Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 03:18:23PM -0500 In reply to:Keith G. Murphy Quoting Keith G. Murphy([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > >

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-10 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > Woooahhh!!! I just swapped the two 4MB SIMMs to each other's slots. > After rebooting, I can no longer cause the seg faulting. (And I *have* > rebooted the machine before without curing the problem). Might be bad > memory! ;-) (Or even bad seati

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-10 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > > > As to what I did: I believe it started when I stupidly started an > > apt-get upgrade, then realized I didn't want to upgrade all that shit > > and CTRL/C'ed it while it was downloading the deb files. I bet it was > > up

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-10 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > As to what I did: I believe it started when I stupidly started an > apt-get upgrade, then realized I didn't want to upgrade all that shit > and CTRL/C'ed it while it was downloading the deb files. I bet it was > updating the cache for the kernel sourc

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-09 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > > > Recently, apt-get has started segfaulting on me every time I do an > > apt-get install. It will also often do it in the upgrade phase. This > > is, of course, quite frustrating. I'm using the 0.3.6 package. > > > > Has

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-09 Thread Marc Mongeon
This used to happen to me all the time, until I changed the terminal emulator I use to access the machine. I changed from Windows telnet (I think) to TeraTerm Pro. I have no idea why this would fix the problem, but it did. I'm still using apt 0.1.9. Marc -- Marc Mongeon <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-09 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Keith G. Murphy wrote: > Recently, apt-get has started segfaulting on me every time I do an > apt-get install. It will also often do it in the upgrade phase. This > is, of course, quite frustrating. I'm using the 0.3.6 package. > > Has anyone seen this before? Does anyone

apt-get segfaults while creating dependency tree

1999-06-08 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Recently, apt-get has started segfaulting on me every time I do an apt-get install. It will also often do it in the upgrade phase. This is, of course, quite frustrating. I'm using the 0.3.6 package. Has anyone seen this before? Does anyone know a workaround or fix? I've seen a bug report on t