On Du, 13 apr 14, 17:24:07, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> > You could use aptitude to mark the dependencies as auto-installed
> > (untested):
> >
> > # aptitude markauto "~Dlibreoffice"
> >
> > Then you can autoremove them as you wish.
Shouldn't that be
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-04-13 05:59 +0200, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
> >> Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>
> [snip]
> >>
> >> Not even the meta-package 'libreoffice'?
> >
> > I rechecked,
On 2014-04-13 05:59 +0200, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
>> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>
>> Hello Patrick,
>>
>> >uninstall or purge libreoffice from the system. 'apt-get purge
>> >libreoffice' won't do it. I've done tests,
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:59:02 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> >I rechecked, and the metapackage is removed, but not any of
> >libreoffice modules. Ultimately, I just purged each of the modules
> >by name, then autoremove the orphaned dependencies.
> >
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 23:21:55 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> I don't use GNOME, so I'll leave that to you. :)
> GNOME is one of the reasons I use a Window Manager. :)
Nah, I'll pass. Stopped using GNOME back in 2007, never looked back
since then.
Reco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:50:03AM +0400, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:18:01 +1200
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:26:10AM -0400, PaulNM wrote:
> > > paul@debguis2:~$ aptitude why libreoffice-writer
> > > i gnome Depends libreoffice-writer | abiword (>
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:59:02 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>I rechecked, and the metapackage is removed, but not any of libreoffice
>modules. Ultimately, I just purged each of the modules by name, then
>autoremove the orphaned dependencies.
>
>There should be an easier way.
Maybe,
Hi.
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:18:01 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:26:10AM -0400, PaulNM wrote:
> > paul@debguis2:~$ aptitude why libreoffice-writer
> > i gnome Depends libreoffice-writer | abiword (>= 2.8)
>
> WTF. Shouldn't that be a recommends?
>
> Seems like a bug
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:26:10AM -0400, PaulNM wrote:
> paul@debguis2:~$ aptitude why libreoffice-writer
> i gnome Depends libreoffice-writer | abiword (>= 2.8)
WTF. Shouldn't that be a recommends?
Seems like a bug to me.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the pe
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> >uninstall or purge libreoffice from the system. 'apt-get purge
> >libreoffice' won't do it. I've done tests, and as far as I can tell
> >little or nothing is removed.
>
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
>
> On 04/11/2014 09:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> [snip]
> > Fine. Everything is installed. Now, sometime later, I want to
> > uninstall or purge libreoffice from
Try removing libreoffice-core .
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/877g6ud7y9@thumper.dhh.gt.org
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 06:15:54 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
Hello Brad,
>Not even the meta-package 'libreoffice'?
No. I didn't read the follow ups. Already dealt with.
Move along: Nothing to see here. :-)
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>uninstall or purge libreoffice from the system. 'apt-get purge
>libreoffice' won't do it. I've done tests, and as far as I can tell
>little or nothing is removed.
Not even the meta-package 'libreoffice'?
--
Regards _
On 04/11/2014 09:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
>
>> On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>>
>>> Now, if "they" could come up with an efficient and effective way to
>>> uninstall/purge stuff installed via a metapackage. Or maybe there
>>> is and I jus
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John Hasler wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > Now, sometime later, I want to uninstall or purge libreoffice from
> > the system. 'apt-get purge libreoffice' won't do it.
>
> Try 'apt-get purge libreoffice && apt-get autoremove'
Already tried. Since the first action doesn'
Patrick Bartek writes:
> Now, sometime later, I want to uninstall or purge libreoffice from the
> system. 'apt-get purge libreoffice' won't do it.
Try 'apt-get purge libreoffice && apt-get autoremove'
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Now, if "they" could come up with an efficient and effective way to
> > uninstall/purge stuff installed via a metapackage. Or maybe there
> > is and I just haven't found it. ;-)
> >
>
> apt-get autoremov
On 04/10/2014 04:56 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Dist-upgrade installs the NEWER version of a file(s) and its
> dependencies, and removes the OLD version. That is, v1.0 to v2.0.
> Upgrade does v1.0 to v1.1 as well a security and bug fixes. Check the
> versions of what was going to be insta
[Please trim your quotes to just include relevant content, makes it
easier to read.]
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:04:21PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> After it went
> Stable, I used just upgrade -- for the most part. So there would be no
> major changes. This also recommended by Debian.
Stable m
On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Now, if "they" could come up with an efficient and effective way to
> uninstall/purge stuff installed via a metapackage. Or maybe there is
> and I just haven't found it. ;-)
>
apt-get autoremove
> B
>
>
- PaulNM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 10/04/14 04:56 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >>>
> Had a strange problem this morning for the s
On 10/04/14 04:56 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
Re
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
> >>
> >>
> >> root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
> >> Reading package lis
On 10/04/14 12:07 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2014 16:17:21 Robin wrote:
Synaptic, I think, defaults to Smart Upgrade, the equivalent is
apt-get dist-upgrade.
Man apt-get for the full details
You probably ran
# aptitude upgrade
too. That doesn't remove anything.
# aptitude ful
On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calc
On 10/04/14 11:17 AM, Robin wrote:
On 10 April 2014 16:07, Frank McCormick wrote:
Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculatin
On Thursday 10 April 2014 16:17:21 Robin wrote:
> Synaptic, I think, defaults to Smart Upgrade, the equivalent is
> apt-get dist-upgrade.
> Man apt-get for the full details
You probably ran
# aptitude upgrade
too. That doesn't remove anything.
# aptitude full-upgrade
would have accomplished
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
>
>
> root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The f
On 10 April 2014 16:07, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
>
>
> root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The
Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer
31 matches
Mail list logo
