On Wednesday 11 March 2009 15:10:05 will trillich wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Boyd --
Please use interleaved quoting style. If that's too much effort,
please bottom-post and trim the quoted text to only what is
relevant.
It makes the posts easier to read for experts that may have not
been
Thanks for the reply, Boyd --
There *is* no pidfile for postgres 7.4 (check the original message --
we've got one for 8.1, none for 7.4 :).
The real problem is really
"main/usr/lib/postgresql/7.4/bin/pg_controldata: error while loading
shared libraries: libpq.so.3: cannot open shared object file:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 19:05:50 +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
[...]
> The word 'testing' was chosen by Debian maintainers to show what they think
> Testing was and is good for them. I should prefer a name like 'desktop' to
> show what I think Testing was and is good for me. Servers need stab
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:05:50PM +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
> The word 'testing' was chosen by Debian maintainers to show what they think
> Testing was and is good for them. I should prefer a name like 'desktop' to
> show what I think Testing was and is good for me. Servers need stable, b
Florian Kulzer schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 17:45:18 +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
>> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
> dpkg --force-overwrite -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-i386_2.6-2_amd64.deb
>
> followed by
>
> apt-get install -f
>
> should fix this.
This
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 17:45:18 +0200, Hans Vogelsberger wrote:
> Since one week or so apt-get is broken because of unmet dependencies on my
> → AMD64, Aspire 4200, Debian, mirror http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/
> → testing.
>
> There should be a bug report, but I do not know against which of t
Since one week or so apt-get is broken because of unmet dependencies on my
→ AMD64, Aspire 4200, Debian, mirror http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/
→ testing.
There should be a bug report, but I do not know against which of the
five packages apt-get, gcc-4.2-base, lib32stdc++6, glibc-2.6.1, or dp
Dave writes:
> Figure out how to make APT point to BASH and file the bug there. Be
> interesting to see what the APT people have to say.
Policy requires that /bin/sh point to a POSIX shell. Zsh is not
POSIX-compliant. You can break many things other than Apt by pointing
/bin/sh to Zsh.
--
John
Carl Fink wrote:
> Shouldn't apt-get then refuse to run under zsh, or itself spawn /bin/sh and
> run scripts under that instead of the default shell?
/bin/sh is the default shell, and it is required on Debian that that
symlink only be pointed to POSIX compliant shells.
--
see shy jo
signature.
* Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 14:51:22 -0400]:
> The strange problem of the "not fully installed or removed" packages I
> have been reporting has been resolved...
Hooray!
>
> It seems that a short while ago I have switched shells from bash to zsh
> to explore its new fe
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:15:05AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> I believe the issue is that /bin/sh is expected to be a bourne shell, or at
> least closely compatible. zsh, "most closely resembles ksh but includes many
> enhancements." ksh has "command language [that is ] is a superset of
Joey Hess wrote:
> set -e
Of course that should have been -x, the point being to see where the
script is failing.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 10:51, Charles Hallenbeck wrote (edited):
> changing the symbolic link
> /bin/sh to point to /bin/zsh instead of /bin/bash.
>
> I changed the link to point to /bin/bash again, [ran apt commands
> successfully
>
> But why? I do upgrades at least once a day, and they usuall
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:26:18PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 23:57 +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 12:21:32 -0400]:
> >
>
> Chuck needs to have a large scrollback and paste it to here for us to
> understand the entire functiona
The strange problem of the "not fully installed or removed" packages I
have been reporting has been resolved, but I do not understand it.
It seems that a short while ago I have switched shells from bash to zsh
to explore its new features. I did it gradually, first doing a usermod
for each of my
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 06:55 -0400, Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
> Hi Simone,
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:36:47PM +0200, Simone Soldateschi wrote:
> >
> > I had a similar problem two days ago trying to update 'libwx2.6-dev' from
> > backports.
> > 'apt-get' failed package upgrade due to unmet depend
Hi Joey,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:21:32PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
>
> Edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/x11-common.config and
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/debconf.postinst and add a new line as the second
> line of each script:
>
> set -e
>
> Then re-run this apt-get -f install and
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 23:57 +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 12:21:32 -0400]:
>
> :
> >
> > set -e
> >
> > Then re-run this apt-get -f install and we should be able to figure out
> > what's really wrong.
> >
> This will tell you where in the script it's
Apologies for not reading the original message closely enough. I got
stuck on the 'x11-common' part and didn't pay enough attention to the
debconf error.
If debconf is having trouble, that's really weird. Perhaps doing a dpkg
-r debconf, then doing a clean reinstall of debconf? Using wget to
do
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 12:21:32 -0400]:
:
>
> set -e
>
> Then re-run this apt-get -f install and we should be able to figure out
> what's really wrong.
>
This will tell you where in the script it's exiting...
--
Cheers,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Why not just keep x11-common? It looks like a whole ton of X libraries
are already installed. Otherwise, figure out which programs depend on
each individual library, either by dpkg --show , or by
trying to remove each library individually.
Up until a month or two ago (when I gave it away), I ran
Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> x11-common failed to preconfigure, with exit status 1
> Setting up debconf (1.5.2) ...
> dpkg: error processing debconf (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Err
* Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 07:43:57 -0400]:
> Yeah, but I can't yank it out! It is not fully installed, and nothing in
> my arsenal can yank it out.
Ok,then:
Look at /var/lib/dpkg/info/debconf.postinst
and see what's in that file-perhaps we can hack a fix from there.
* Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 13:58:57 +0200]:
> one more note, in case you have aptitude installed, you may try using
> that, too, as it is known to be handle conflicts and brakage slightly
> different from apt-get; The interactive interface can show what is
> broken and such
one more note, in case you have aptitude installed, you may try using
that, too, as it is known to be handle conflicts and brakage slightly
different from apt-get; The interactive interface can show what is
broken and such
(just calling out a few suggestions now)
HTH,
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
just thinking aloud, maybe `apt-get --reinstall install debconf` could
help out on debconf, and then also on x11-common... I hope?
HTH,
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:12:29PM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 06:50:32 -0400]:
>
>
> 'Eek!' said I, and yes, do a backup.
>
> Then, yank it out.
Yeah, but I can't yank it out! It is not fully installed, and nothing in
my arsenal
Hi Joris,
When I add either the --force-depends or the --force-all option to the
dpkg --purge x11-common command, they also fail to remove the package.
When I then do an apt-get -f install, I get the same familiar failure as
I reported earlier.
I may have to save what I can and reinstall my sy
* Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 06:50:32 -0400]:
>
> Do I dare try to remove debconf? I better do a backup first, this is
> getting serious
'Eek!' said I, and yes, do a backup.
Then, yank it out.
Then, pull debconf from the testing
repository manually and install with
Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
Hi, Joris
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:37:17PM +0200, Joris Huizer wrote:
Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
Package x11-common is not installed, so not removed
Hmm, you could try `dpkg --purge x11-common`
Unfortunately I get the same familiar output:
Script started on
Hi Simone,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:36:47PM +0200, Simone Soldateschi wrote:
>
> I had a similar problem two days ago trying to update 'libwx2.6-dev' from
> backports.
> 'apt-get' failed package upgrade due to unmet dependencies and I was unable
> to fix the problem with 'apt -f install'.
> A
* Simone Soldateschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 12:36:47 +0200]:
> A debian user suggested me to fix the problem using synaptic and filtering
> defective packages.. it did the job.
Sorry. Here, he can't do that because he isn't even running X, only some
components of it are needed for his
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:39:07PM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> Ok, it looks like x11-common can't do anything because somethings hosed
> with debconf.
> Try apt-get -f install debconf, or dpkg-reconfigure debconf, and see what
> happens there.
The apt-get -f install debconf gives me the same c
Hi, Joris
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:37:17PM +0200, Joris Huizer wrote:
> Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
> >Package x11-common is not installed, so not removed
>
> Hmm, you could try `dpkg --purge x11-common`
Unfortunately I get the same familiar output:
Script started on Wed 14 Jun 2006 06:38:49 A
Ok, it looks like x11-common can't do anything because somethings hosed
with debconf.
Try apt-get -f install debconf, or dpkg-reconfigure debconf, and see what
happens there.
--
Cheers,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On 6/14/06, Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dave,On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:> * Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 05:42:43 -0400]:>> Try:
> apt-get remove --purge X11-common> apt-get dist-upgradeI had a similar problem two days a
Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
Package x11-common is not installed, so not removed
Hmm, you could try `dpkg --purge x11-common`
HTH,
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:02:30PM +0700, Dave Patterson wrote:
> * Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 05:42:43 -0400]:
>
> Try:
> apt-get remove --purge X11-common
> apt-get dist-upgrade
>
>
Here is what happens when I do the remove:
Script started on Wed 14 Jun 2006
* Charles Hallenbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-14 05:42:43 -0400]:
Try:
apt-get remove --purge X11-common
apt-get dist-upgrade
--
Cheers,
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list,
I am running Debian unstable without x, except that some console apps
seem to require some of the x infrastructure. Lately my apt-get upgrade,
dist-upgrade, install, and remove all seem to fail because of a package
or two that are neither fully installed or removed. I can't seem to fin
Wednesday, 15 February 2006 05:06, Thomas Lenon wrote:
> I'm still stuck with apt-get refusing to remove gforge-db-postgresql
> and gforge-ldap-openldap because they depend on postgresql which was
> removed first.
That really should not be an issue. Have you tried to list them for
removal all at
After trying some of the suggestions in :
http://distrocenter.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/10/12/1952217&tid=106
I'm still stuck with apt-get refusing to remove gforge-db-postgresql and
gforge-ldap-openldap because they depend on postgresql which was removed
first.
dpkg (remove and purge) also
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:09PM +0800, Marcus Deluigi (intern) wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I tried to install an unofficial debian package (AMPortal) by adding a
> new ressource to resources.list.
> But the installation failed with the error message:
[...]
The problem is that your unofficial package
> (intern) wrote:
> > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/asterisk/sounds/ext-or-zero.gsm',
> > which is also in package asterisk
>
> ^^^ the package conflicts with `asterisk'.
>
> > and I can't install any other packages anymore, because apt-get
> > reports unmet dependencies:
> >
> > ---
> > Th
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:09PM +0800, Marcus Deluigi (intern) wrote:
> trying to overwrite `/usr/share/asterisk/sounds/ext-or-zero.gsm', which
> is also in package asterisk
^^^ the package conflicts with `asterisk'.
> and I can't install any other packages anymore, because apt-get reports
>
Hi!
I tried to install an unofficial debian package (AMPortal) by adding a
new ressource to resources.list.
But the installation failed with the error message:
---
apt-get install amportal asterisk-sounds-amportal
[...]
Fetched 2622kB in 1s (2533kB/s)
(Reading database ... 75051 files and direct
Jeff Bauer wrote:
I recently installed Knoppix 3.3 on my desktop
(2.4.22-xfs). I had no problem using apt-get
to grab the latest openoffice, python, xemacs,
etc. But after I retrieved some KDE development
tools, I'm no longer able to use apt-get.
When executing apt-get -f install:
Reading Pack
I recently installed Knoppix 3.3 on my desktop
(2.4.22-xfs). I had no problem using apt-get
to grab the latest openoffice, python, xemacs,
etc. But after I retrieved some KDE development
tools, I'm no longer able to use apt-get.
When executing apt-get -f install:
Reading Package Lists... Done
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Steven Schlansker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having trouble configuring packages. When they are installed, it
> skips the configuration. When I run dpkg-reconfigure, it returns
> immediately. What should I do about this? Thanks.
> Steven Schlansker
I'm having trouble configuring packages. When they are installed, it skips the configuration. When I run dpkg-reconfigure, it returns immediately. What should I do about this?
Thanks.
Steven Schlansker
Hey,
is there any easy way to find out which packages apt depends on? My
installation of apt is broken, and I seem to need a library (libapt)
which I can't find anywhere.
Cheers
Tiarnan
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 08:35:50PM -0600, Bill Barnes wrote:
> Attached is a copy of my sources.list.
You might also consider adding:
deb http://security.debian.org potato/updates main contrib non-free
for security updates
> It seems that about every other time I do apt-get update that one or mor
Hi List:
Attached is a copy of my sources.list.
It seems that about every other time I do apt-get update that one or more
sources will not connect.
Is there another, more reliable list of sources?
Thanks,
Bill
Get your own FREE
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 09:32:52AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
:
: Here's what happens when I try to `update' :
:
: # apt-get update
: Get ftp://debian.crosslink.net dists/hamm/ Packages
: Error ftp://debian.crosslink.net dists/hamm/ Packages
: 550 /pub/linux/debian/dists/hamm/Package
Here's what happens when I try to `update' :
# apt-get update
Get ftp://debian.crosslink.net dists/hamm/ Packages
Error ftp://debian.crosslink.net dists/hamm/ Packages
550 /pub/linux/debian/dists/hamm/Packages.gz: not a plain file.
Get ftp://debian.crosslink.net dists/proposed-updates/ Packages
55 matches
Mail list logo
