On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:01:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Or, just use "sudo dpkg -i old-package.deb" (maybe in chroot).
>
> Please read "Chapter 2. Debian package management"
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.en.html
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-refere
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:22:34PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:58 -0800
> Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:01:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Osamu
> >
> > OMG!
> >
> > Osamu as in "Debian Reference Copyright 2007-2009 Osamu Aoki"?
> >
> > T
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:05:58 -0800
Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:01:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
...
> > Osamu
>
> OMG!
>
> Osamu as in "Debian Reference Copyright 2007-2009 Osamu Aoki"?
>
> That was an undertaking.
>
> There is a great deal of clarity in the way the referenc
On 10-02-27 12:04:08, Freeman wrote:
...
> Following the big xserver-org/mesa seg-fault/crash I was at grub
> playing space invaders.
>
> 1.) I could reach the diversion to maintenance mode where it
> recommended running e2fsck on mounted partitions, which I eventually
> did, reluctantly.
I wou
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:01:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:41:26AM -0800, Freeman wrote:
>
> > In which case, I pin the rolled back version to 1001. The preferences file
> > can live on in moderation for the sake of learning.
>
> Or, just use "sudo dpkg -i o
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:01:44PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:41:26AM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> > > > My ego may be the more delicately balanced but my system is the more
> > > > precious. :)
> > >
> > > This squeeze testing cycle has been rough because of major t
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:41:26AM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> > > My ego may be the more delicately balanced but my system is the more
> > > precious. :)
> >
> > This squeeze testing cycle has been rough because of major transitions.
> > My recent upgrade in one of the multiboot setup from stabl
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:41:35PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:15:24PM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:10:26PM -0800, evenso wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:33:05PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > > > On Monday 15 February 201
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:41:35PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:15:24PM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> > I'd rather find out that the above Preferences are destructive here than
> > during an install!
>
> Your setting will install latest experimental of a package which
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:24:01 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat,20.Feb.10, 18:41:35, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > FYI:
> > The upcoming apt_preferences(5) manpage (e.g.: apt_0.7.26~exp2_i386.deb)
> > states:
> >
> >Preferences are a strong power in the hands of a system
> > administrator but
On Sat,20.Feb.10, 18:41:35, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> FYI:
> The upcoming apt_preferences(5) manpage (e.g.: apt_0.7.26~exp2_i386.deb)
> states:
>
>Preferences are a strong power in the hands of a system administrator
>but they can become also their biggest nightmare if used without ca
In <20100220094135.gc12...@osamu.debian.net>, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>Right
>now, stable and testing have too much gap usually to be useful.
That's not true. I mix stable/backports/testing/unstable/experimental.
Roughly 78% of my systems is packages from stable with the remainder mostly
from testin
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:15:24PM -0800, Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:10:26PM -0800, evenso wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:33:05PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > > On Monday 15 February 2010 13:30:19 Freeman wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > However, could a rollback
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 05:10:26PM -0800, evenso wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:33:05PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > On Monday 15 February 2010 13:30:19 Freeman wrote:
>
> >
> > > However, could a rollback represent an incursion on the priority system?
> >
> > With testing/unsta
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:33:05PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 13:30:19 Freeman wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:59:33PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > >
> > > Mixed systems that are supported with no configuration change:
> > > stable/backports
On Monday 15 February 2010 13:30:19 Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:59:33PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > On Monday 15 February 2010 12:22:08 Freeman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:18:51AM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:32:10AM -0800, free
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:59:33PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 12:22:08 Freeman wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:18:51AM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:32:10AM -0800, freeman wrote:
> > > > Is pinning really necessary or can I get
On Monday 15 February 2010 12:22:08 Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:18:51AM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:32:10AM -0800, freeman wrote:
> > > Is pinning really necessary or can I get by with aptitude and my
> > > apt.conf file:
> > >
> > > APT::Default-Release "
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:18:51AM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:32:10AM -0800, freeman wrote:
> >
> I've used apt-cacher, and it worked well. However, I recommend
> apt-cacher-ng (which I'm using now). I have Ubuntu and Debian machines
> on my LAN, and apt-cacher did not
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:32:10AM -0800, freeman wrote:
> I installed apt-cacher because I wanted a way to reliably roll back one
> version of a package in testing. This way, if a new version is buggy, the
> way the recent xserver-xorg/mesa was for me, and I let it slip by
> apt-listbugs, I may p
I installed apt-cacher because I wanted a way to reliably roll back one
version of a package in testing. This way, if a new version is buggy, the
way the recent xserver-xorg/mesa was for me, and I let it slip by
apt-listbugs, I may possibly choose the old version from apt-cacher rather
than nearly
21 matches
Mail list logo
