Javi Barroso
>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hello,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> El 23 de febrero de 2016 18:08:32 CET, Michael Fothergill
>> >> >> escribió:
>> >> >> >Dear Folks,
gt; On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Michael Fothergill
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 23 February 2016 at 18:46, Javi Barroso
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> El 23 d
t;> > On 23 February 2016 at 18:46, Javi Barroso
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> El 23 de febrero de 2016 18:08:32 CET, Michael Fothergill
>> >> escribió:
>> >> >Dear Folks,
>> >> >
>> >&g
23 de febrero de 2016 18:08:32 CET, Michael Fothergill
> >> escribió:
> >> >Dear Folks,
> >> >
> >> >I tried using apt-build to install a source file:
> >> >
> >> >root@rhubarb:/home/michaelmikef/Downloads# ls -l adun*
> >> >
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Michael Fothergill
wrote:
>
>
> On 23 February 2016 at 18:46, Javi Barroso wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> El 23 de febrero de 2016 18:08:32 CET, Michael Fothergill
>> escribió:
>> >Dear Folks,
>>
On 23 February 2016 at 18:46, Javi Barroso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> El 23 de febrero de 2016 18:08:32 CET, Michael Fothergill <
> michael.fotherg...@googlemail.com> escribió:
> >Dear Folks,
> >
> >I tried using apt-build to install a source file:
> >
> &
Sorry about that I replied to your personal account by mistake.
MF
Hello,
El 23 de febrero de 2016 18:08:32 CET, Michael Fothergill
escribió:
>Dear Folks,
>
>I tried using apt-build to install a source file:
>
>root@rhubarb:/home/michaelmikef/Downloads# ls -l adun*
>
>-rw-r--r-- 1 michaelmikef michaelmikef 1395 Feb 23 16:36
>adun.app_0.
Dear Folks,
I tried using apt-build to install a source file:
root@rhubarb:/home/michaelmikef/Downloads# ls -l adun*
-rw-r--r-- 1 michaelmikef michaelmikef 1395 Feb 23 16:36 adun.app_0.81-6.dsc
root@rhubarb:/home/michaelmikef/Downloads# apt-build install
adun.app_0.81-6.dsc
W: Unable to
Dear Debianists,
I installed apt-build on a laptop (amd 64) (I am running Jessie amd64
installation).
I am still learning about it.
It asks you to choose the optimisation setting.
I chose native.
But I suspect that was not right.
I then did apt-build install efl.
and it found the source
On 18/09/11 13:59, Chris Brennan wrote:
> So I decided to try and play with apt-build and I got the following
> which I can't seem to solve or figure out how to solve lol
>
>
>
>
> Any idea's cause I'm stumped!
apt-build requires src entries in /etc/apt/
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:59:13 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
>
> > So I decided to try and play with apt-build and I got the following
> > which I can't seem to solve or figure out how to solve lol
>
> (...)
>
> I do
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:59:13 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> So I decided to try and play with apt-build and I got the following
> which I can't seem to solve or figure out how to solve lol
(...)
I don't know how apt-build works nor does, but let me make some
observations about
So I decided to try and play with apt-build and I got the following which I
can't seem to solve or figure out how to solve lol
root@Blackdragon:~# apt-build update
Could not open file
/var/lib/apt/lists/www.debian-multimedia.org_dists_squeeze_contrib_source_Sources
- open (2: No such fi
I would like to use apt-build for certain programs. However I wonder if
apt-build is compatible with aptitude. From what I understand aptitude
is the preferred application (instead of apt-get) because of better
(reverse) dependency handling by aptitude. Using apt-get interferes with
aptitude in
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:44:05AM +0100, Matt Miller wrote:
>
> I'm new to apt-build, so I may be missing something simple.
>
You might also want to try the instructions in my package customization
HOWTO:
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto/howtos/debcustomize
Regards,
-Robert
Under etch I'm trying to use apt-build to apply the iptables "tproxy"
patch from balabit.com. The apt-build process seems to complete
properly when I use the --patch option to include the patch, and I get a
new .deb in my apt-build repository. However, when I use dpkg to
instal
Adam Porter wrote:
> For anyone who would like to use apt-build more, but has run into bugs
> dealing with differing binary and source "Version" fields, there is a nice
> patch available at bug 332594:
> I don't know why the patch hasn't been released in an update
For anyone who would like to use apt-build more, but has run into bugs
dealing with differing binary and source "Version" fields, there is a nice
patch available at bug 332594:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/apt-build.diff?bug=332594;msg=17;att=1
I don't know why t
Message-
> From: S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 12:49 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: apt-build
>
> On Monday 25 September 2006 11:54, Deepak Kumar Tripathi wrote:
> > Hi i am using apt-build.
> > and i wrot
Title: RE: apt-build
its a very good .
Deepak Tripathi ..---.
Open Source Developer / \
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 25 September 2006 11:54, Deepak Kumar Tripathi wrote:
> Hi i am using apt-build.
> and i wrote two patch for it also one for show tha catch package and one
> for search.
>
cool, then, what is ur feelings about apt-build.
&
Title: RE: apt-build
Hi i am using apt-build.
and i wrote two patch for it also one for show tha catch package and one for search.
anyway i am working for changing the comilation script for different -different architecture.
Thanks
Deepak Tripathi ..---.
Open Source Developer
On 9/23/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:58:31PM +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:> any body here using apt-build ??> i am interested to use it to get optimized package for my em64t (i don't> like amd64 unoffical )
Well, em64t is j
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:58:31PM +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> any body here using apt-build ??
> i am interested to use it to get optimized package for my em64t (i don't
> like amd64 unoffical )
Well, em64t is just Intel's name for amd64. It is their way of trying
t
any body here using apt-build ??
i am interested to use it to get optimized package for my em64t (i don't
like amd64 unoffical )
--
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)
Home page: http://lavluda.tripod.com
Blog: http://lavluda.tk
Yahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavluda
gpg public key: A99
Hi all. Anyone out there using apt-build? When I began using it, I
tried to "rebuild" glibc without knowing that debian already provided a
customized glibc for an i686 processor (like mine), so I installed the
one provided by debian.
However, whenever I issue an "apt-build u
It would be nice if I could get a performance boost by compiling my
packages for my hardware. Apt-build seems to be a good answer for this:
http://julien.danjou.info/article-apt-build.html
But I have a few questions:
1.) Is apt-build safe in the sense it doesn't foul up your system whe
I have also tried it, but I stopped using it because apt-build was not able to download a lot of sourcecode. I also could not find much information about the tool.Ben2006/4/13, S. M. Ibrahim <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:On Wednesday 12 April 2006 13:04, Adam Porter wrote:
> S. M. Ibrahim (lavlu
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 13:04, Adam Porter wrote:
> S. M. Ibrahim (lavluda) wrote:
> > Any body here useing apt-build. I am interested to know your openioun
> > about this tool.
>
> I think it has great, great potential, but it still has some important bugs
> that can m
S. M. Ibrahim (lavluda) wrote:
> Any body here useing apt-build. I am interested to know your openioun
> about this tool.
I think it has great, great potential, but it still has some important bugs
that can make it unusable at times (like simply not finding a source
package, when $apt-get
Any body here useing apt-build. I am interested to know your openioun about this tool.
--
S. M. Ibrahim (lavluda) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HomePage: http://lavluda.tripod.com
Blog: http://lavluda.blogspot.com
Hi list,
i would like to have some feedback from people who used apt-build
to rebuild the entire system with apt-build world , in particular what
packages have been excluded as indicated in the manpage and in
/usr/share/doc/apt-build/README.Debian
Thanks in advance,
MC
Dear list,
I am trying to use apt-build to compile a few software for my
machine. The problem is that the configuration file at
/etc/apt/apt-build.conf seems to get ignored; for options from there
aren't used.
From the 'net, I have learnt and have used the following:
build-dir = /var
Dear list,
I tried out apt-build on a few packages, and it's quite nice, in that
I can compile with optimizations for my computer. I'd like to know
whether some packages when compiled actually do show some speed
increase, if you've tried it...
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462
Hello y'all!
I'm trying to apt-build world but seem to be coming up with lot of errors,
and i haven't been able to locate a solution.
Sorry, can't find aalib1, is it already installed?
(Remove it first, or try running 'apt-get clean')
Sorry, can't find adduse
Hi all,
what wrong with apt-build/sarge ??
Seems sarge sucks .
This is what i have after a apt-build install -t sarge ethereal :
Fetched 784kB in 15s (51,0kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting atk1.0 in atk1.0-1.8.0
-> Building libatk1.0-dev <-
E: Unable to find a source package for atk1
I have this problem with apt-build:
building sources works for almost all packages, but when going to
install them it fails with this error:
---
Building dependency tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild gsl with some optimizations for my machine:
$ cat /etc/apt/apt-build.conf
build-dir = /var/cache/apt-build/build
repository-dir = /var/cache/apt-build/repository
Olevel = -O2
mcpu = -mcpu=pentium4
options = " -march=pentium4 -msse2 -malign-double -mfpmath=ss
Hello!!!
I can not build squid_2.5.9-8 packages with apt-build_0.11.9_i386. It
is a last Sarge packages.
# apt-build build-source squid
Building the following packages from source:
squid-cgi
squid
squid-common
squidclient
-> Installing build dependencies (for squid) <-
Reading P
* Sam Watkins
| I think it was Larry Wall who said "there's more than one way to do it"
| and invented an insane language (perl) in which there are 15 billion
| confusing ways to do anything. So Larry is not supporting your
| argument! :)
TIMTOWTDI is more of a warning than anything else. Tha
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 09:29:07PM -0500, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
> Wasn't it Larry Wall who said "Do we need 10 ways to do something?"
I think it was Larry Wall who said "there's more than one way to do it"
and invented an insane language (perl) in which there are 15 billion
confusing ways
> Well, not to follow up to my own post but ... something as simple as
> apt-build install top doesnt work.
Well you'll also find that "apt-get install top" and "dpkg -l top" don't
work either, for the reason that "top" is not a Debian package!
Try &
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:42:14 +0200, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can also try sbuild, apt-src, pbuilder and apt-fu (still unofficial) from
> deb & deb-src http://des.petta-tech.bogomips.org/~eric/apt-fu/ ./
Wasn't it Larry Wall who said "Do we need 10 ways to do something?"
Al
On Saturday 25 December 2004 20:45, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
--cut--
> :) Overall I like apt-build and will prolly enjoy it more as I get
>
> more away from using /usr/local and trying to stay within Debians
> main-stream system configuration...
You can also try sbuild, apt-s
=)
Well, not to follow up to my own post but ... something as simple as
apt-build install top doesnt work.
I guess I have no idea what I'm going to use apt-build for - or maybe
I'm just so accustomed to building/installing everything into
/usr/local/ (I mean I compile software f
OK :-)
I have played with it a bit and find it will not download things like
openoffice.org or gnome-core
Maybe Im mis-understanding the configuration or the intent of apt-build?
I know openoffice.org is a source package available via apt-get
source|build-dep etc...
???
--
WC -Sx- Jones
http
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 08:52:58PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> I have translated a french article about apt-build. This is a quick
> introduction about its usage.
> I hope this could help some people to use this software and to make it
> better by sending patches, for example.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:23:08PM -0500, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
> My question to you is -- Would building all source from Debian scratch
> myself using apt-build make my system more stable and faster? Or
> would I be prone to sending you funny e-mails after I've destroy
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:23:08PM -0500, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
> My question to you is -- Would building all source from Debian scratch
> myself using apt-build make my system more stable and faster? Or
> would I be prone to sending you funny e-mails after I've destroy
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:52:58 +0100, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have translated a french article about apt-build. This is a quick
> introduction about its usage.
> I hope this could help some people to use this software and to make it
> better
really quick question, as I haven't used apt-build yet and am on a ms
box at work... I've just read the pdf howto here:
http://www.mozilla.org.br/~cbegotti/apt-build.pdf
If I set up apt-build for my system and run "apt-build world" (let's
assume it's set up cor
Hello,
I have translated a french article about apt-build. This is a quick
introduction about its usage.
I hope this could help some people to use this software and to make it
better by sending patches, for example. :-)
apt-build: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/apt-build
French: http
I prefer to install my packages from source, for better optimization
therefore i use apt-build. I don't know how to set options like alsa
sound output (rather than oss), that my processor is p4 and so on. Where
can i find a good tutorial about editing the apt-build.conf file? I want
to be ab
source list? if 's not, why is supported?
I also installed apt-build, everything went smoothly, it downloaded,
installed, configured as only debian knows how, happiness was everywhere,
then I went to install a software, and it stop saying that it needed a
certain parameter in line 6 of apt-bu
e either.
>
> Is it xorg supported in Debian? if it's so, do I need to add any line to
> my source list? if 's not, why is supported?
>
IIRC, attempt to package Xorg for Debian will start after Sarge release.
> I also installed apt-build, everything went smoothly, it downloaded
's not, why is supported?
I also installed apt-build, everything went smoothly, it downloaded,
installed, configured as only debian knows how, happiness was everywhere,
then I went to install a software, and it stop saying that it needed a
certain parameter in line 6 of apt-build.conf. I we
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 12:35, John Foster wrote:
> Basicaly what it says. I want to get Apache2 to work with php4. I found
> a .rpm at SuSe that I converted with alien but it depends on prefork. I
> do not like prefork. php4 in debian still has apache-common 1.3 as a
> dependency so even with the
Basicaly what it says. I want to get Apache2 to work with php4. I found
a .rpm at SuSe that I converted with alien but it depends on prefork. I
do not like prefork. php4 in debian still has apache-common 1.3 as a
dependency so even with the module installed and apache configured with
prefork it
xbox, xmms, gkrellm ,xine-ui and it worked.
i doesn't work (until now) with mozilla, gaim and openoffice.org
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 09:29, Joel Alexandre wrote:
hi,
i've just discovere apt-build.
it works with some packages and with other it doesn't.
example.
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 09:29, Joel Alexandre wrote:
> hi,
> i've just discovere apt-build.
>
> it works with some packages and with other it doesn't.
>
> example. xine-ui worked fine.
> gaim and mozilla i just get this error:
Not sure but I think that the mozilla
hi,
i've just discovere apt-build.
it works with some packages and with other it doesn't.
example. xine-ui worked fine.
gaim and mozilla i just get this error:
apt-build --reinstall install mozilla
-> Installing build dependencies (for mozilla) <-
Reading Package Lists.
Hi All !
Since a while I tried to personnalized my Debian box
with `apt-build': I get nothing execept the help page and
the message "Sorry, couldn't find XXX or XXX is already installed(...)"
Does `apt-build' work ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I downloaded the source package for 'apt-build' from testing/unstable (don't
recall which--same version, anyhow) and built and installed it on my
woody/stable system. I have some problems building a lot of packages,
however.
r 2002 3:48 AM
To: Travis Crump; David Pastern
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apt-build and Athlon question
Thanks, Travis.
I can't look at anything written, I would have to take down the cooler and
reassemble my computer... better not. I don't want to destroy my processor.
joerg
T
Thanks, Travis.
I can't look at anything written, I would have to take down the cooler and
reassemble my computer... better not. I don't want to destroy my processor.
joerg
T.C. wrote
>
> That is identical to my /proc/cpuinfo and I have an athlon-tbird. I
> know this by looking at the invoice
Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> I just installed apt-build and gcc3.2 to get some packages recompiled
> Athlon-optimized. In the installation screen, it promts me for the processor
> I am going to optimize for:
> athlon
> athlon-tbird
> athlon-4
> athlon-x
Hi everybody
I just installed apt-build and gcc3.2 to get some packages recompiled
Athlon-optimized. In the installation screen, it promts me for the processor
I am going to optimize for:
athlon
athlon-tbird
athlon-4
athlon-xp
athlon-mp
How do I find out which one is mine? I know I don't
Hello list,
I've read the manpage of apt-build. Is there anyone tried apt-build
world? Is it stable?
--
Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
69 matches
Mail list logo