On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:37:39PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I use both apt and cmdline aptitude. Mostly cmdline aptitude
>
> I'm curios if when I call `apt update' or `aptitude update', if they
> are refreshing the same database files... wondering if I could do just
> one update on either tool
I use both apt and cmdline aptitude. Mostly cmdline aptitude
I'm curios if when I call `apt update' or `aptitude update', if they
are refreshing the same database files... wondering if I could do just
one update on either tool and that would do both.
Thanks for your replies. The answers are
clear and helpful. Again thanks.
M.A. Perry
--
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:54:21 +
Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:49:21 +0100
> "M.A. Perry" wrote:
>
> > Dear People,
> > A simple question for which I have so far found no
> > answer in the Debian documentation. My computer
> > is a domestic, Debian 8.6 AMD-64 box that uses
> > apt-get a
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:49:21 +0100
"M.A. Perry" wrote:
> Dear People,
> A simple question for which I have so far found no
> answer in the Debian documentation. My computer
> is a domestic, Debian 8.6 AMD-64 box that uses
> apt-get and aptitude for ugrades and/or installations.
>
> We are curren
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 09:49:21PM +0100, M.A. Perry wrote:
> Dear People,
> A simple question for which I have so far found no
> answer in the Debian documentation. My computer
> is a domestic, Debian 8.6 AMD-64 box that uses
> apt-get and aptitude for ugrades and/or installations.
>
> We are cur
Dear People,
A simple question for which I have so far found no
answer in the Debian documentation. My computer
is a domestic, Debian 8.6 AMD-64 box that uses
apt-get and aptitude for ugrades and/or installations.
We are currently writing a set of ip_tables rules for
a default baseline -A OUTPUT
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 21 November 2015 13:10:47 Javi Barroso wrote:
>> I think that using multiarch is a problem for aptitude.
>
> I've not had a problem using multiarch with aptitude on Wheezy. I hope that
> those are not famous last words.
A
On Saturday 21 November 2015 13:10:47 Javi Barroso wrote:
> I think that using multiarch is a problem for aptitude.
I've not had a problem using multiarch with aptitude on Wheezy. I hope that
those are not famous last words.
Lisi
Hello,
El 20 de noviembre de 2015 18:03:03 CET, Pavel Volkov
escribió:
>What's the current officially recommended way to operate packages: apt-
>
>utilities or aptitude?
>I heard aptitude development was stalled and it offered no real
>advantages
>(not counting interactive mode).
It was stalle
On Fri 20 Nov 2015 at 19:29:09 +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Pavel Volkov [2015-11-20 20:03:03+03] wrote:
>
> > What's the current officially recommended way to operate packages:
> > apt- utilities or aptitude? I heard aptitude development was stalled
> > and it offered no real advantages (not co
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:03:03 +0300
Pavel Volkov wrote:
> What's the current officially recommended way to operate packages:
> apt- utilities or aptitude?
> I heard aptitude development was stalled and it offered no real
> advantages (not counting interactive mode).
>
Aptitude has more intellige
Pavel Volkov [2015-11-20 20:03:03+03] wrote:
> What's the current officially recommended way to operate packages:
> apt- utilities or aptitude? I heard aptitude development was stalled
> and it offered no real advantages (not counting interactive mode).
There's no "the" way for normal use. Releas
What's the current officially recommended way to operate packages: apt-
utilities or aptitude?
I heard aptitude development was stalled and it offered no real advantages
(not counting interactive mode).
14 matches
Mail list logo
