On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 08:54:56 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2018-04-06, David Wright wrote:
> >>
> >> Certainly I have no proof except my experience
> >
> > Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think you've shared any.
>
> I've found something ambivalently concrete.
>
> Note
> Since apt / apt-get
On 2018-04-06, David Wright wrote:
>>
>> Certainly I have no proof except my experience
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think you've shared any.
I've found something ambivalently concrete.
Note
Since apt / apt-get and aptitude share auto-installed package status
(see Section 2.5.5, “
On Fri 06 Apr 2018 at 07:36:09 (+0900), Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:31:11AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 07:47:05AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > I'm not sure if you really did what it sounds like you did here, but if
> >
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:31:11AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 07:47:05AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm not sure if you really did what it sounds like you did here, but if
> > you did... you can't mix and match commands to apt-get and aptitude.
>
>
On Mon 02 Apr 2018 at 10:53:07 (+0200), Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote:
> The reason why it failed is that it looked for Packages.xz which
> did not exist on my mirror. The reason why my mirror did not
> have a Packages.xz file is that it was made with the version of
> debmirror in Debian 8, which onl
>> What I'd like to know now is : what prevents apt-get from
>> downloading the Packages file from the mirror ? Wget can !
>
> Move all the files out of /var/lib/apt/lists/ so that apt-get update
> has to download fresh copies. That should get you back on track.
>
> By all means take the opportuni
On Wed 28 Mar 2018 at 21:07:35 (+0200), Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote:
> > Try running:
> > sudo apt-get update # one more time, to be sure
> > # then
> > apt-cache policy ntp
> >
> > and see what version it refers to.
>
> Thanks for the suggestions folks but there's not much to see
> there, no packa
Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote:
> /var/lib/apt/lists/, which may be why it thinks that not being
> able to download it is not a problem.
>
> Unfortunately, the Packages file in /var/lib/apt/lists/ is out
> of date by months because it pertains to 9.2 while the mirror
> has 9.4. Diffing the two shows wh
> Try running:
> sudo apt-get update # one more time, to be sure
> # then
> apt-cache policy ntp
>
> and see what version it refers to.
Thanks for the suggestions folks but there's not much to see
there, no packages are pinned.
I've made some progress, though. A closer look at the output
reveals
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 07:47:05AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
[...]
> I'm not sure if you really did what it sounds like you did here, but if
> you did... you can't mix and match commands to apt-get and aptitude.
I think this is false, at least in
On 2018-03-28 02:50, Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote:
After apt-get update, attempting to install ntp tries to
download version 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1 and fails. It tries
to download +deb9u1 because
$ aptitude show ntp
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1
State: not installed
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 07:50:03PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Thomas wrote:
> After apt-get update, attempting to install ntp tries to
> download version 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1 and fails. It tries
> to download +deb9u1 because
>
> $ aptitude show ntp
> Package: ntp
> Version: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+d
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:50:03 +0200 (CEST) Jean-Baptiste Thomas said:
> How is this possible ? I'm confused.
In my Buster system the situation is like this:
~$ apt-cache policy ntp
ntp:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-6
Version table:
1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-6 500
500 http
After apt-get update, attempting to install ntp tries to
download version 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1 and fails. It tries
to download +deb9u1 because
$ aptitude show ntp
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1
State: not installed
[...]
and it fails because the version of the packag
14 matches
Mail list logo