Re: apropos segfault

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 11:48:08AM -0500, Vikki Roemer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:17:43AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:27:19PM -0500, Vikki Roemer wrote: > > > For the past few days I've been having trouble with apropos > > > segfaulting. > > > > It's been rep

Re: apropos segfault

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:17:43AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:27:19PM -0500, Vikki Roemer wrote: > > For the past few days I've been having trouble with apropos > > segfaulting. > > It's been reported a million or so times. It's a bug in glibc, to be > fixed in libc6 2

Re: apropos segfault

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:27:19PM -0500, Vikki Roemer wrote: > For the past few days I've been having trouble with apropos > segfaulting. It's been reported a million or so times. It's a bug in glibc, to be fixed in libc6 2.3.1-6. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [[EMAI

Re: apropos segfault

On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:49:55PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > Vikki Roemer writes: > > But does anyone have any idea what the problem might be? > > No, but lots of people (including me) are seeing the same thing. Bug > reports have been filed. Ok, thank you. -- Vikki Roemer Registered Linux u

Re: apropos segfault

Vikki Roemer writes: > But does anyone have any idea what the problem might be? No, but lots of people (including me) are seeing the same thing. Bug reports have been filed. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

apropos segfault

Hi! For the past few days I've been having trouble with apropos segfaulting. Part of the problem is, it's not very consistent-- in fact, I though that it had gone away yesterday, but it's back today. Sometimes, depending on what I'm looking for, it will get most of the way through before segfaulti