Re: apm strangeness

<> > > Okay, I ran modconf and installed apm module in the > kernel. Before wasn't apm built into most debian > kernel images? I also did a ``cp -R > /lib/modules/kernel-pcmcia-2.4.18-686 > /lib/modules/2.4.18-686/pcmcia'' and the pcmcia > modules showed up in modconf. I installed > yenta_socket,

Re: apm strangeness

--- Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Charles, > > <> > > > > --- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Look in /proc. There should be an apm file > > there. > > > > If not, linux is NOT using > > > > apm. >

Re: apm strangeness

--- Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Charles, <> > > --- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Look in /proc. There should be an apm file > there. > > > If not, linux is NOT using > > > apm. > > > > Okay, no /proc/apm but what could've killed it for > > 2.4.17 ?

Re: apm strangeness

Hi Charles, * Charles Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020306 13:43]: > > --- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Look in /proc. There should be an apm file there. > > If not, linux is NOT using > > apm. > > Okay, no /proc/apm but what could've killed it for > 2.4.17 ? It was working

Re: apm strangeness

--- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Look in /proc. There should be an apm file there. > If not, linux is NOT using > apm. Okay, no /proc/apm but what could've killed it for 2.4.17 ? It was working just fine before I installed 2.4.18 . = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacking is a "Good

Re: apm strangeness

Look in /proc. There should be an apm file there. If not, linux is NOT using apm.

apm strangeness

I had kernel-2.4.17-686-image running just fine w/ apm support on my Dell Latitude. I think it's very nice of the package maintainers to include that, btw. I have the line append="apm=on" in my lilo.conf. Yesterday I installed kernel-2.4.18-686-image. Now when booting back into 2.4.17, wmbattery wo