On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:35:39PM -0500, Paul McHale wrote:
> I am not sure how to contact the keeper of the debian apache package.
File a wishlist bug against the apache-common package (where modules are
actually kept). Instructions are at:
http://bugs.debian.org/
(A good first step is
I am not sure how to contact the keeper of the debian apache package. I
know it ships with a lot of modules. The developer of mod_frontpage now has
the frontpage extensions in DSO module form which will be released with the
next Mandrake Linux. Any chance woody's apache package could inte
Actually I got it wrong the doc root for suexec is not /usr/lib/cgi-bin, I
did a little more research and this is what I found on the apache package
page:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/apache.html
in the apache_1.3.14-2.diff.gz file I found the following lines(9877-9905):
--- apache
or the cgi scripts to function properly. And that the doc root
> configuration for suexec must be set when it is compiled along with apache.
>
> The Debian apache package puts the cgi-bin in this directory:
> /usr/lib/cgi-bin
>
> I figure that the suexec doc root is probably set
tion for suexec must be set when it is compiled along with apache.
The Debian apache package puts the cgi-bin in this directory:
/usr/lib/cgi-bin
I figure that the suexec doc root is probably set to this directory and that
if I were to create cgi-bin directories inside my virtualhost directories
the
out therefore causing httpd.conf not to start. (That would be the
problem your getting).
Can anyone tell me if there is a way around this problem with apacheconfig?
Thanks in advance
Daniel Wagner wrote:
Hello.
Does anybody know whats wrong with the apache-package from woody? When i
insta
Hello.
Does anybody know whats wrong with the apache-package from woody? When i
install it the start fails, with the following message:
-->
Syntax error on line 251 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
Invalid command 'ExtendedStatus', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
module not included
I recently upgraded my debian woody.
Now whenever I start apache it just dies and I get this error in
/etc/apache/error.log :
apache: dl-close.c:122: _dl_close: Assertion `new_opencount[0] == 0' failed.
This is package apache-1.3.12-2.1
Any ideas what could cause this error ?
Silver
smime.p7s
128 since that is the port Squid uses.
Hope that helped as I am a bit rusty since setting up my home network some
time ago.
Cheers.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris R. Martin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 5:08 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debi
I've installed Apache 1.3.9-13.1 (from frozen)
I can access the default page from my windoze box, but any other page
(including the links on the default page) gives the client 403 Forbidden.
I've checked and all the directories and files should be world accessible
(read, execute world).
Why
It worked, George. You should know that I updated
base-passwd after the last fix, though. Other than that,
it looks like a "go!" Don't forget dependencies, if there
are any, BTW, I also used the most easy-and-excellent-for-
newbies _dselect_, the method that allows us to punch "y"
or "n" an
"George" == George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
George> base-passwd. The trouble is that base-passwd overwrites
George> /etc/passwd ... or at least it used to the last time I screwed
George> up and selected it.
It no longer does this.
George> Why is Apache dependant on that package? If
On Mon, 12 May 1997, Douglas L Stewart wrote:
> Argh. I have an old Redhat system (3.x) that I've been converting to a
> Debian 1.2 system. Everything's been going okay... until now.
>
> I just installed the apache package and it _WIPED_ my /etc/httpd directory
> cal
The release of the Apache server you are using supports dynamically loaded
modules providing its functionality. Please wait while the modules needed
by your configuration are determined...
Checking for available modules. done.
Checking for needed modules...
wai
Argh. I have an old Redhat system (3.x) that I've been converting to a
Debian 1.2 system. Everything's been going okay... until now.
I just installed the apache package and it _WIPED_ my /etc/httpd directory
calling it obselete, without prompting me to do so, and withing saving th
erating any?
>
Yes. Yes. Yes. I spent some time modifying the Apache package so that
the binary is able to dynamically load modules at startup and the
configuration script lets one choose modules. The net result is that:
1. The Apache package has *all* modules, and one will choose which one
On Sep 11, 6:39pm, Bernard Leach wrote:
} Subject: apache package
} It seems that Mark Shuttleworth is no longer maintaining the
} apache package. Just wondering who, if anyone has picked
} it up and if there is a 1.1 version.
The 1.1.1 version will be in unstable this week.
Yves.
--
Yves
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stoyan Kenderov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>you may want to know, that the package version 1.0.5-1 gives me
>on an ordinary machine, ordinary setup a lot of "oops"
A user level program can _never_ result in a kernel oops. If it does,
it's bad hardware (RAM!) or
Bernard Leach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: It seems that Mark Shuttleworth is no longer maintaining the
: apache package. Just wondering who, if anyone has picked
: it up and if there is a 1.1 version.
A debian apache 1.1.1 is available on ftp.fuller.edu/Linux/debian/apache
This packe will be
On Wed, 11 Sep 1996, Stoyan Kenderov wrote:
> you may want to know, that the package version 1.0.5-1 gives me
> on an ordinary machine, ordinary setup a lot of "oops"
What kernel are you using? I know there is a bad kernel which causes
apache to have big problems. I think it is 2.0.15 but don't
Bernard Leach wrote:
>
> It seems that Mark Shuttleworth is no longer maintaining the
> apache package. Just wondering who, if anyone has picked
> it up and if there is a 1.1 version.
>
Hi Bernard,
you may want to know, that the package version 1.0.5-1 gives me
on an o
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernard Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that Mark Shuttleworth is no longer maintaining the
> apache package. Just wondering who, if anyone has picked
> it up and if there is a 1.1 version.
According to debian/indices/Mainta
It seems that Mark Shuttleworth is no longer maintaining the
apache package. Just wondering who, if anyone has picked
it up and if there is a 1.1 version.
--
Bernard LeachLa Trobe Uni Melbourne Australia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.cs.latrobe.edu.au/~leachbj/
23 matches
Mail list logo
